Jump to content

PASabreFan

Members
  • Posts

    45,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PASabreFan

  1. 'We'll never know what happened on July 1.'

     

    'This happened on July 1.'

     

    'Uh, that didn't happen on July 1.'

     

    'Yeah, but it should have.'

     

    :lol:

     

    PS - the Drury offer sat on TG's desk, not LQ's. And he did EVENTUALLY agree to sign it; but well after Drury'd had enough.

    And my point is proved. There won't ever be agreement on this, and there won't ever be agreement on what happened with Babcock. We're just the fans and customers, who create all the wealth these guys are scrambling for — we don't deserve to know.

  2. Not by me.  I have watched time and time again UFA come to Buffalo and heard countless players say how amazing the area is.  The credibility thing is a straw man argument used on this board a ###### ton.

    They have to say that. What are they going to say, it sucks? Thomas Vanek said how much he loved Long Island.

  3. Well I for one think that Babcock is a very good coach.  I also think that the difference between Babcock and the other candidates is minimal.  I am laughing at you freaking out before we know any of the facts or what happened.  You don't know the dollar amounts, you don't know if Babcock was playing us, you don't know how much input he wanted, you don't know if he actually wanted to coach Buffalo.  So I am laughing at your outrage at a situation none of us really understand.  

    We'll never understand it. What happened on July 1, 2007? Why did LaLa leave? Who shot JFK?

  4. You're staring at coffee grounds, though. 

     

    No matter now many actual legit reasons Babcock will give to explain his decision, you'll be convinced it's because Tim Murray lacks the proper personality. 

     

    GO SABRES!!!

    I'll listen, but I don't expect the Sabres or Babcock would ever tell tales out of school. Bottom line, Murray had Babcock actually negotiating a contract; money wasn't an object; how they would work together was widely reported as what they were hung up on; Babcock goes to Toronto.

  5. Your narrative, PA. I just don't think things need to rise to the same level of doubt as you do. 

     

    I don't believe for a second that Nolan had ZERO input on player personnel. I don't think he always got his way, though, either. And I believe Nolan was resentful because of that. Indeed, I think Nolan was downright obstinate. I also think Murray had every reason to question Nolan's ability as a coach which caused him to lose confidence in Nolan's ability, including his ability to evaluate personnel. 

     

    Lastly, I think you're over thinking Babcock's and Murray's discussion about levels of control over player personnel. I don't see Babcock's request for more control as something to question Murray about at this point. It's one thing for Murray to limit Nolan's involvement and quite another to give Babcock more leeway. Babcock has earned that given his success. Nolan, not so much. 

     

    GO SABRES!!!

    It's not a narrative, but if it is, it's Murray's narrative if anyone's. He detailed how poor the communication was. It's not a figment of my imagination.

     

    I'm not sure I buy the idea that Murray got into the job, figured Nolan was gone soon anyway, so I might as well not even try to have a good working relationship with my coach in my first GM job. Doesn't make sense. It's more a reflection of Murray's personality, IMHO.

×
×
  • Create New...