-
Posts
35,483 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Taro T
-
A 6 year deal gives them 7 shots at it (he's under contract this coming year still). But a 4 year deal or a 3 year deal still has him having arbitration rights. Arbitration isn't as big of a concern (IMHO) as him being eligible to receive an offer sheet which happens anytime after a 1 year deal is signed. And neither is really all that big of a threat if the team is doing right by the player. They can negotiate a follow-up deal a year before any other team can talk to him and if he's being treated right (he will be) there's a really good chance that he'll sign that 3rd contract at the same point in his career as Dahlin is on the verge of doing (1 year before the end of his bridge deal). Just IMHO, thought a 5 year deal is the worst outcome, a 6 year deal is the next worse. And yes, we can agree to disagree.
-
Pretty sure he meant tha tyou can get Sunday ticket without buying the rest of the YouTube package. Which is doable, but it costs an extra $100 than it would if it is bundled w/ YouTube TV. And either way, if you order it by some time in September, you'll save $50 over waiting until past that date (believe it is 9/16, but not positive, it IS sometime in September that the non-early early bird early bird discount goes away. (Had it been purchased prior to June 6, it would've been $100 off whichever option was chosen.)
-
Your "worst outcome" ISN'T happening. This kid has gone from 3rd pairing to top pair within the 1st year (1st couple of games in tournaments) at EVERY level he's been at w/ the exception of the NHL and that's because he has a Norris candidate ahead of him and very little quality outside those 2 and the team had significantly worse outcomes when those 2 were played together rather than each playing on separatre pairings. There is no ####ing way he has peaked. Totally get wanting to stay cautious but waiting until he's played another season (or x seasons) will just make that next deal all that much more expensive. Ideally get him for 7 or 8 years. If that is a no go from Power's perspective, sign him to a 4 year deal. It'll max out the time they have him on the "cheap" bridge deal without putting significant leverage into his agent's pocket.
-
Dick(less) Jauron. Quotable quote "it's hard to win in the NFL." No Schlitz Sherlock.
-
Would be surprised if he falls to 13. IF he gets past the Caps wouldn't mind seeing them move up slightly to grab him. (Getting a guy that could be 1st overall were the draft to NOT include Bedard and were geopolitics different is a good thing.) Wouldn't be willing to trade up ahead of Washington because it'll likely cost too much.
-
Nope. Backing in is when you get in by clinching even though you lost the last game (or few) and were literally going to go backwards in the standings if the teams around you were reasonably competent.
-
Most likely has to do with not wanting to be held liable for whatever antimicrobial coating / preservative treatment the floss has when that coating / treatment eventually breaks down. Because you just know that some pinhead will come back to them trying to collect a huge paycheck saying how was anybody to know that storing something next to a toilet for 20 years would be a bad thing.
-
Good thing the local highways were designed for and constructed when Buffalo's metro population was over 500k. Because that #1 ranking for minimal traffic had to be the item that pushed them ahead of every place but Carolina.
-
According to Pierre Lebrun, Sabres have interest in Brett Pesce.
Taro T replied to inkman's topic in The Aud Club
IF he's legitimately available, that would seem to be about the right price. Because the only reason he'd be available is if Carolina knew they couldn't ink him to a new deal and are looking to get value for him before he walks in a year. And then it comes down to, would anybody else top that package without a LT deal in place? Have to figure, of the contending teams, not a lot would have the pieces to make the deal happen AND the cap space a year from now to get him what he wants. Yes, the Sabres will be getting near the cap next off-season, but they'll still have some room for a piece or 2. -
Neither on the sub. BC for dipping the fries/chips. Obviously.
-
Having ONE of them is something this team has never seen for more than parts of a season here or there. The Sabres (except for the last month or so of '05-'06 and that playoff run have never had A #1 D-man. They legitimately could have TWO at the same time for a very long time.
-
It's also easier for coaches / front offices to make the trip from 1 locale to another when they're all a coupole of hours away from each other. None of these are huge advantages; but they all ARE advantages.
-
We seem to be arguing past each other. It helps to have the ECHL team close enough to easily move players up and down. But it isn't a massive advantage and if one of the teams is on the road it isn't really any advantage. Yes, Binghamton is primarily Rags country. It SHOULDN'T be.
-
From the Sabres standpoint, having a team in the Southern Tier not only makes it easier to move guys between Ra-cha-cha and the ECHL; it gives them a marketing in to cut into (depending upon how far east you're looking) the Rags or the Pens market. Everything in NYS north of the Delaware River and west of the Hudson SHOULD be Sabres territory. Having the baby farm club in that territory can help with that to a certain degree.
-
No, the best option would be the "even better than best" option you brought up which is to put a team back into either Binghamton or Elmira (or on an outside shot, even Corning). Have those players playing less than 2 hours from Ra-cha-cha if they need to call somebody up. And also have the Southern Tier get back to being Sabres territory rather than Rags territory.
-
Report: Teams are "poking around the Sabres" about Victor Olofsson
Taro T replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
In a vacuum, with only 1 team (or at most 2 teams) interested in Olofsson, yes, his getting benched at the end of the season could work against his value. But teams aren't bidding against the Sabres usage of VO (if that were all they're bidding against, his value would be a 3rd or 4th rounder). Teams are bidding against other teams that want a 25ish goal scorer that fits in well in the room on a reasonable contract for 1 more season. There are more than 2 teams that have a need for that sort of a player. The Sabres should be able to get something legit for VO and if he's a part of a package they should be able to get something actually GOOD for him. -
McDaniels record in those 3 games: 1-2. Had either Allen not bobbled a snap at the end of the 1st half or McKenzie just moved the ball forward rather than laterally at the end of the 2nd half; the Bills at least attempt a field goal that would've provided the points needed to drop McDaniels to 0-3 in those games. Or maybe the "coaching genius" he displayed was designing the stadium to give his sideline 30 degree cooler temperatures than the playing field and the other sideline? If not that, maybe it was placing an obviously concussed player back on the field for another 1/2 of football? The guy who made the observation that McDaniels outcoached the other coach is a blowhard that isn't worth our time.
-
Had never heard that Peca got swindled by his advisors. REALLY wish the pro sports leagues did a better job of vetting advisors to their players. Especially the NHL where a LOT of the Canadian kids (and usually a lot of the guys from other countries too) have very limited formal educations. Here's to hoping that his misfortune works out for us (and for him in the long run, a lengthy coaching career won't necessarily get him all that lost revenue back but it can get back enough of it).
-
Umm, is the correct answer a non-negligible chance for failure of the artificial disc which could effect tragic consequences? It's great that he's taken a handful of viscious hits and seems none the worse for the wear of them. But, considering how few athletes that take the sort of punishment a professional hockey player takes that have had this particular procedure, it seems a smidge premature to be crowing about how Eichel absolutely was right in getting the procedure. Personally, expect it will work out, but literally have almost no data to support that belief. (And an expectation with no data to base it upon is exactly that - a belief.)
-
Bills - 2 Championships. Stampede - 1 Championship.
-
Presuming your Q was open to all, would say most likely he hits 55. But if he's getting 2nd line usage (with actual 2nd line linemates, not the ones he spent most of October with) wouldn't be at all surprised to see 65. Personally expect to see him get 5 years x $5.5 and there being a great outcry when that contract is announced.
-
Would you trade Devon Levi for Connor Hellebuyck with a contract extension?
Taro T replied to inkman's topic in The Aud Club
Yes and no. Primarily IMHO because of the youth in the F ranks and only having 1 guy that is clearly past his prime and only 2 others arguably past it, they stayed astonishingly healthy at F this season. Thompson and Tuch both missed time, but can't think of any others that missed more than a game or 2 due to injury up front. The guy that was supposed to get the lion's share of the net this year was out for 1/2 the season and then didn't work back into the rotation until late in the year. So, they were not one of the least injured at that position. They also had a lot of D-men losing time to injury, mainly all at roughly the same time, and had at least 2 (and likely 3) that played significant time while hobbled by injuries they played through. Expect that they likely were towards the middle of the pack on that front but also were likely on the more injured end of the middle 1/3 of teams. Would expect overall the team to have roughly the same quantity of man games lost next year (the team is likely going to be even younger than last year overall) but will a bit of a more normal distribution by position. -
Orchard Park is 10 minutes from downtown. Sunrise FLA is 15 minutes from Lauderdale and appears to be a good 40+ minute drive from Miami. And there LITERALLY is nothing once you go to the other side of the rink for dozens of miles. That rink couldn't have been built more remotely from the population center if they were trying. Never been to AZ but have been told that Glendale is a suburb pretty far from downtown Phoenix with a lot of the population on the other side of Phoenix (Glendale is on the opposite side of the city from Mesa and Scottsdale). Neither's situation is anywhere close to the ones you mentioned. Yes, the Meadowlands seems to be about 30 minutes from NYC but it looks to be less than 10 miles from NYC on the map and there are 11MM people in NYC/on LI plus you have all of NJ and eastern PA to draw from as well. And Arlington is a suburb of 2 fairly large cities - both Dallas and Fort Worth. It's not like the old Texas Stadium ended up in Plano or Ennis which to Dallas (and especially Fort Worth) is more akin to what Sunrise is to Miami. Would say it would be a closer analogy to placing the Corel Centre in Kanata but even that was at least in a traditional market.
