LGR4GM Posted Saturday at 09:01 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:01 PM 5'10" center with good numbers. Heading to Ohio State Quote
PerreaultForever Posted Saturday at 11:08 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:08 PM Typical Sabres pick. No thank you. Virtually no chance of making the NHL imo. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted Saturday at 11:48 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 11:48 PM 40 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: Typical Sabres pick. No thank you. Virtually no chance of making the NHL imo. 1 Quote
Slack_in_MA Posted Sunday at 12:56 AM Report Posted Sunday at 12:56 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, PerreaultForever said: Typical Sabres pick. No thank you. Virtually no chance of making the NHL imo. Out of curiosity, what type of player wouldn’t be a “typical Sabres pick” in the late rounds? Can’t the same be said for every other teams’ late round picks? Are there too many rounds in the draft? Should they just leave the draft after the 3rd round? Edited Sunday at 12:57 AM by Slack_in_MA 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted Sunday at 04:28 AM Report Posted Sunday at 04:28 AM 3 hours ago, Slack_in_MA said: Out of curiosity, what type of player wouldn’t be a “typical Sabres pick” in the late rounds? Can’t the same be said for every other teams’ late round picks? Are there too many rounds in the draft? Should they just leave the draft after the 3rd round? Non typical would be big guys who maybe aren't high enough because they have skill shortcomings or speed shortcomings. Guys you develop for the AHL team support system or if they are good enough they become the guys who can chuck 'em to quote Lindy. We go for the too small to be high picks with speed and skill we think might turn them into................I guess Victor Olafsson. I'm going to the extreme ends here but that's the general idea. You can make arguments for either but we don't generally do both. We go the one way only and that's what makes it "typical". imo you also weight your draft back end towards D and goal because goalies take the longest and often bloom late and D take longer to develop than forwards. 1 Quote
HOUSE Posted Sunday at 06:49 PM Report Posted Sunday at 06:49 PM In 3 years this could lower one of our regular season losing streaks from 12 games to 11 1 3 Quote
Taro T Posted Sunday at 09:17 PM Report Posted Sunday at 09:17 PM 22 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Typical Sabres pick. No thank you. Virtually no chance of making the NHL imo. Which is said of virtually EVERY non-goaltending 5th - 7th round pick made by any NHL team. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted Monday at 12:20 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:20 AM 3 hours ago, Taro T said: Which is said of virtually EVERY non-goaltending 5th - 7th round pick made by any NHL team. True. The gambles/reaches are guys that have one exceptional attribute and you hope they develop others. 1 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted Tuesday at 02:12 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 02:12 AM I figure you get one pick over 180OA to hit once every 10 years. Olofsson (2014-181), Paetsch (2003-202), Wideman (2002-241), Gaustad (2000-220). Had a good run in the early 2000s. TBD: Kozak (2021-193) I don't think Mancari and his 42 career games counts (2004-207). Best of luck to Rucinski. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.