Jump to content

Flashsabre

Members
  • Posts

    6,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Flashsabre

  1. 5 minutes ago, French Collection said:

    Mitts, 16OA and Johnson was an idea.

    Portillo’s name thrown around as a sweetener later because they didn’t think that was enough.

    I have to admit that I do love watching Cozens and Dubois playing together at the Worlds. That would be a long term playoff line.

    If you knew what Dubois would want on a long term deal then I would definitely consider it.

  2. 1 minute ago, Claude Balls said:

    I figured the game would be tight and they would try to out- physical each other. All the talking heads were saying what a bloodbath this series was going to be. I thought so too, and it still might. 

    Never mind, its starting, lol

    I called them and told them you weren’t impressed. They said to hold their beers.😁

    • Haha (+1) 2
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, Claude Balls said:

    Ugly as in physicality, but that quick response by Edmonton changed everything. That's "what I am talking about". This game was billed to be an all out war. That hasn't happened yet. 

    It’s not going to happen unless Calgary get up by 4 or 5 late.

  4. 5 minutes ago, Claude Balls said:

    This Flames game gonna get ugly real quick. Oilers need a wake up call. But so far, this game isn't living up to expectations. 

    It is 3-1 less then 10 minutes in. What are you talking about?

  5. 45 minutes ago, dudacek said:

    Gauthier at 6 and Pronman stating some scouts are liking him in the top 5.

    Looks like the dream of getting him at 9 is going to die early.

    The thought has always been that playoffs are big boy hockey. Big, skilled players make the difference. NHL front offices believe that.

    That is why I think both Gauthier and Geekie will be picked before #9.

  6. DeBoer is a jerk. One of the talking heads said MAF wouldn’t go back to Vegas because of DeBoer.

    He was canned because someone had to take the fall and it was either Pete or Foley would can McPhee or McCrimmon.

     

    Also, Isles promotes Lane Lambert to Head Coach. Weird that he has been Trotz’s right hand man for 11 years and they boot Trotz and promote him.

    • Like (+1) 2
  7. 36 minutes ago, sweetlou said:

    Nylander replaces Johnny Hockey on top line line with fellow Swede Lindholm.

    Ah, so if Gaudreau walks. That could make sense but Mangiapane is a big part for them and Nylander is the anthesis of Daryl Sutter hockey.  But if he bought in it might work.

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. They took a boom/bust type guy in Rosen last year at #14. Wonder if that will play into #16 this year. If they will play it safe or if they swing for the fences again.

    I guess a lot will depend on who they grab at #9. My totally uninformed prediction for #9 is Gauthier or a falling Savoie.

  9. 31 minutes ago, mjd1001 said:

    Many/most of us root against the Leafs, but I do find it interesting as a fan of Hockey to look at their situation and think about what could be done to make things better.

    So much so that when working outside today I was listening to Toronto Sports talk.

    -Many fans calling in want major changes. Some of it really extreme, like tearing things down and rebuilding from scratch, but that I assume is just emotion talking.

    -Lots of fans calling in asking for more 'toughness'.  Tom wilson guys...guys that will play borderline dirty and make other players not want to come over the middle.

    -Biggest thing fans (and radio hosts) were advocating was to change coaches. Seems to be an early cry for them to hire Trotz.

    -LOTS of complaining about officials, how they are against Toronto. At one point even the hosts said "they didn't lose because of the officials" but then they went on for 10 minutes about how the calls were bad against the leafs and some of those calls may have changed the flow of the game against them and caused them to lose.

    At one point, they got onto a topic I mostly agree with. They said you need a good team to win, but if you look at most teams that win the cup or at least go deep in the playoffs, they usually have a D-man or 2 that are franchise D-men or very close to it, and they have franchise Goalies or at least a goalie that has the ability to get really really hot and carry them under pressure. Toronto doesn't have either of those and its not clear how they can get one.

    The more i think about it, the fans may be against it, but I think one of the 'big 4' might have to be traded.  Tavares is probably not moveable because of his age and contract.  Matthews is the one guy you don't want to move for anything.  That leaves Marner and Nylander. IF Toronto could trade one of them and get a stud D-man who can control the game from the backend, it might be worth it.  No one wants to trade a young D-man like that, But if Toronto floated Marner (preferable) or Nylander, a future #1 pick (although it would likely be a later round pick) and a top Minor league prospect, MAYBE they could get someone to give up a Young D-man.

    Toronto is in Win-Now mode.  Tavares is showing some slight signs of slowing down due to age, Matthews only has 2 more years left on his deal before he is unrestricted. Maybe you forget about the future and say we have to win in the next 2 years...so you offer up to anyone Nylander, your next 2 first round picks, a 2nd rounder, any prospect they want, and maybe take back a long term injury contract and see what is the Best D-man you can get for that package. 

     

    From the Sabres point of view..if Toronto offered you Marner and their next 1st rounder for Dahlin would you do it?  It would free up cap room for Toronto to get a goalie also.

     

    Absolutely no to Marner and a 1st for Dahlin.

    The Leafs died the day they signed Tavares. They had Matthews, Marner and Nylander all coming up for new contracts and those deals crippled the franchise.  

    Dubas did a masterful job this season putting a team together with such limited cap space but in the end the result was the same.

    0-9 in games to put a series away. That is a mental weakness in your core.

    They have like $2 million to sign 8 players. 

    Nylander has been their best forward the last two playoffs but he will have to go. No one is touching Tavares with a ten foot pole, they are not trading Matthews and Marner is BFFs with Matthews and the Toronto kid.

    But moving Nylander won’t be about bringing a top end dman back. It will be about futures to open up some cap space they are desperate for to ice a team. I don’t Know what they do in net. Pray that Kallgren becomes a saviour. They can’t resign Campbell unless he wants $750,000 a year.

     

  10. 2 hours ago, mjd1001 said:

    Toronto is in a tough position.

    Once 'cooler' heads prevail, it would seem you would want to run the same core back out there next year, and their cap situation, while not DIRE, dictates you may not have many options because they won't have much flexibility. No major contracts come off the books next year....but if you want to keep Campbell in goal he will require a big pay increase. There really isn't any room to improve the team by spending more money, but the point is you are good enough (and the core is young enough) where you don't need to. The old Billy Beane philosophy of team building....make a team good enough to get to the playoffs and when you do just hope for the best.

    The tough part is....you aren't getting any BETTER,  and is basically 'the same' good enough? You might be as good as or slightly better than Tampa next year again, but they will be a tough out in the playoffs.  And, with 'the same' team I see Toronto has having a tough time getting by what Carolina will be next year, and it would be an upset for them to get by Florida.  Then if you do all that, if you make it to the cup finals are you better than a team like Colorado in a 7 game season?

    I don't know. Again, logic says it will be very hard to make major changes so go with what you have, but I just look at the Leafs and see too many areas that may not be weaknesses, but at least 'non strengths', that they seem to be built a bit flawed to defeat multiple other top teams in 7 game series.

    I'd love to have another year by Campbell in net like he had this year (or someone else to do the same) and I think in a playoff series they need one or 2 D-men who are young, great skaters who can control the game...and I would gladly trade one of their forwards to get that guy on the back end.   I just don't see a team that has an 'under 30, all star level D-man' trading them to the leafs for someone like Nylander, and the Leafs have no cap room to sign or offer sheet one to get them over the top.

    Leafs will also lose a couple of their low key difference makers in Mikheyev and Engvall and probably have to move Kerfoot.

    They have no young goalie to come up so I don’t know what they do. They have something like $2.5 million to sign 8 guys.

    One of the most alarming stats I have seen with this Leafs team is:

    Record in  games where they can close out a series: 0-9  There is a massive mental issue with that group.

×
×
  • Create New...