-
Posts
606 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Refuting
-
-
Just now, Toilet_Mop said:
STRENGTH AND HONORÂ
Plus AM I NOT MERCIFULÂ
-
Just now, LGR4GM said:
Commander of the army of North, general of the Felix Legions, loyal servant to the true emperor.Â
STRENGTH AND HONORÂ
-
1 minute ago, LGR4GM said:
Max
Who's MaxÂ
-
17 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:
Will you post anything if Buffalo wins? Asking for a friend.Â
Who's the friendÂ
-
19 hours ago, mjd1001 said:
Not at the expense of taking away the top scorers and seeing a more boring team in its place.
Still doesn't make sense I don't care how they play if they win more games. Play the trap for all I careÂ
- 1
-
5-2 Red WingsÂ
-
1 minute ago, Thorny said:
I always see a little bit of Keanu in Doan, ymmv
- - -Â
Imo, I was on record saying the bare minimum result that could be even *argued* to be a successful result is 82 points (and that was being nice) and the surpassing of the 15-16 total of 7 years ago, a total that Murray never surpassed, that, as a high-water mark, got him fired. It’s a .500 club. It’s not hard to do and this is the GM’s 3rd season, and it’s the second in the “new plan”, where we had 76 last year.Â
I can’t see how failing to even improve by ~3 wins, when we are supposed to be seeing progress, could be deemed an acceptable result, especially considering it would be quite disingenuous to discount the fact people were, almost to a man, touting the finish and supposedly valuable sample size to end last season where they played WELL beyond an 82 point pace, as something that could/should carry over, at least somewhat.Â
If they miss the playoffs by 10 points or less I'd be happy with the improvement based off last year's teamÂ
-
7 minutes ago, Thorny said:
I’ll take a team that banks as many points as the amount of times you change your avatarÂ
DisclaimerÂ
Â
Â
*sarcasm*Â
Â
LOLÂ
Honestly I would take a team that had more points than last year. Obviously, I'd like them to make the playoffs this year and every year but improvement IS improvement. There's no disputing that. I have no idea what MJD is talking aboutÂ
-
7 minutes ago, mjd1001 said:
Again, Sarcasm is something on this board that is hard to detect becasue of just how serious some people can be with points that seem just, honestly absurd to me.
I honestly think there are probably people on this board that WOULD take a team that still misses the playoffs but gets 9-10 points more playing a Defensive minded, low scoring game.
I don't understand this you wouldn't take a team that has more overall points than last year?Â
-
Just now, Thorny said:
But they haven’t gone cold, yet. Tage, obviously, hasn’t either.
I guess I just question you logic that you could alter one of those variables without the other being significantly affected.Â
I just told you why lol they could be taken off Tages lineÂ
Certain guys (Tuch, Skinner) have certain celings in my opinionÂ
I was being mildly sarcastic when I wrote the none will get 60 points partÂ
Tuch 25 G 32 A 55 points, there's no way he gets 80 pointsÂ
Skinner 30 G 35 A 65 points, wont get 80 pointsÂ
Dahlin 15 G 49 A 64 points, ceiling is still unknown Â
It's too bad the Tage line isn't our 2nd line would be the best in the leagueÂ
Â
-
Just now, Thorny said:
What do you think TT gets to? Considering Tuch and Skinner are glued to his hip, it would be difficult for neither to reach 60 if Thompson is banking 80+.Â
I don’t even think Tuch has been very good and he’s point a game right now.Â
42 GÂ
35 AÂ
77 PointsÂ
They are glued to him now doesn't mean it can't/won't change
Skinner is all over the place points wise for his career
Tuch is solid but not a good point producerÂ
Skinner and Tuch will go cold. Tage, on the other hand, seems immune so farÂ
-
None of them will get past 60 pointsÂ
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Except for Tager
-
23 minutes ago, Gatorman0519 said:
Strange. We are one of the highest scoring teams this year yet in the basement because we give up a lot of goals. That says a lot about what is wrong.
Because they score 45797335543 goals once every 5 gamesÂ
-
LGR gonna have an aneurysm over thisÂ
- 1
-
4 hours ago, Toilet_Mop said:
5-1 LightningÂ
Nailed itÂ
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Curt said:
A guy in his 3rd NHL season simply is not a rookie, and you will continue to be misunderstood if you keep using the word like that. Â Everyone else is not going to adjust to your personal definitions.
Hey look it's the forum monitor lol relaxÂ
Regarding trade targets find out if there's another TkachukÂ
-
-
4 minutes ago, inkman said:
Not because of their QB playÂ
Amd yet Jimmy leads them to the playoffs every yearÂ
-
13 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:
The bucs? Really
We can tell who doesn't pay attention to football lolÂ
-
LOL that was an AWFUL kick by BadgelyÂ
-
It's clear and obvious that Dorsey is not as good a play caller as DabollÂ
- 2
-
@ SweetlouÂ
He won't respond because it's a direct contradictionÂ
-
5 minutes ago, Thorny said:
Very fair question.Â
I was born into it. Â
My dad is a Sabres die-hard and I was brainwashed into it before ever having a conscious choice.Â
- - -Â
I was shaped by it. Moulded by it. The first time I saw the light of a different NHL team...it was BLINDING
Lol u crazy ThornyÂ
-
4 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:
Neat
Lol @ changing your own quoteÂ
GDT: Sabres @ Redwings, 11/30/2022, 7pm, TNT đź“ş, wgr đź“»
in The Aud Club
Posted
What a great movie truly timelessÂ