Thorny

Ymmv then but I’m definitely moving the pick. If your analysis is correct and the pick would fetch more - option 1, trade the pick: better return assets for now, better defender for right now (Power) option 2, trade power: weaker return assets for now, weaker defender for right now (Schaefer) im not sacrificing a better outlook for next year, two fold, in exchange for the chance Schaefer ends up better than OP down the line Not close to be honest given how crucial it is for this team to win, for once

Did Adams hack your account EEE

What has more value in a trade, the pick as is or Power?

Maybe in theory, but this is absolute fantasy land. This gets suggested every year and it never happens We want to willingly increase the degree of difficulty of a build we can’t get going, as is, by saddling Kevyn Adams with the need to make a great trade involving Power? incredibly hard pass. We talk on the daily that Adams has his back against the wall in trades. Like a lamb to the slaughter if we send him out into negotiations with teams knowing we need to trade a specific D man

Bob’s rankings are out, particularly of note with the Sabes in the running for 1 overall. #1 is, of course, a left shot D-man

We have no interest in making the playoffs next year if Kulich lines up in the top 6 to start the year Like, zero but to answer your question: no it’s not a desired stat line for a C on this particular team, because we don’t seem to have any traditional playmaking centres

Seriously? No

Hope if we draft a C it’s a playmaker

Ya

They know it’s over so there’s really nothing to be gleaned imo. Evaluation years are a luxury of like 3 years ago Can’t use the runway to teach accountability either as none of it will register until ownership and management run the team reflective of playoffs being the goal, unlike this season

If we all admit the season is over, can we get an influx of board members back evidently waiting around for the offseason?

Goalies are in fact the one position where you can say, on its face, “size matters”. Burden of proof is on any small goalie. It’s hard

You know how “ask the audience” on who wants to be a millionaire is almost always correct? Like there’s that thing that in large sample sizes you’ll generally get correct answers to common problems…I feel like it’s not stupid to suggest a sabrespace committee would have done a better job in the last 14 years than the management we had. Why not?

It’s not “he’s hiring unqualified candidates who actually turn out to be suggesting good ideas for some reason which he then refuses to enact because he wants it to be his genius that saves the say” like it’s such an unnecessary added layer purely for the obviously see-through purposes of pretending Adams might be ok You can’t have your loophole. Adams is not good lol

A wholly unqualified GM being left to his devices literally explains the poor results…never mind one upon which ridiculous handcuffs are imposed. You are trying way too hard. You’ve got him: it’s Terry. Him hiring awful candidates and handcuffing them explains our ineptitude. He’s not *also* vetoing the good ideas the unqualified people are coming up with for reasons best known to ourselves

Why do you lay these troubles on an already troubled fan base? Can you not see we grow weary of your malcontent….your warmongering

Ride out and MEET them

The reason he can’t “bumble into a good hire” is because it’s nearly impossible for any GM to field a playoff team under the parameters he’s setting: the only people willing to take the job are wholly unqualified candidates like Adams who have no business being an nhl GM at all: thus the putrid results even relative to restrictions imposed you are right: Pegula is the central issue. The pool of candidates would be much larger and likely to produce a playoff team if Pegula actually cared about making the playoffs. But he doesn’t

And the Blues won in 2019 because they traded for a 2nd round picked C in ROR - they didn’t win because they had 5th overall Brayden Schenn on the roster

The fact he doesn’t only serves to make the picture crystal clear, though. I mean, I wonder which category “non-responsive, barely present” owner more likely falls under? -Overbearing day to day meddler who loves the team so much he won’t shut up, who just won’t stop interfering till he gets it right? -Or does it fall in line more with someone who neglects the team and won’t give them the proper resources to find success? Hmm I wonder. And the team doesn’t spend money either…I suppose that’s what Terry determined in his endless hockey discussions was the way to make team good…it doesn’t line up at alllllll with not giving a sh*te. The world knows all of his GM hires are under-qualified…cheap hires who won’t complain about the constraints inflicted. Budgetary constraints in the name of winning, right? But, our bad performance can’t *possibly* be explained by these admittedly drastically under-qualified candidates being left to steer the ship, right? The ones being asked to operate on a shoe-string budget? Naaaaaaaah we just can’t know. The owner must be forcing them to make bad hockey decisions TOO! It’s gotta be. I can only assume the extremely incompetent Pegula hired very good, capable candidates, for some reason, who are entirely capable (….for some reason??????) of fielding playoff teams on budgets no one else can, if only he had let these guys have a clear run of things to implement the GM plan they came up with after learning about what a “an NHL manager” job is on the day they were first approached to take the job

How can we be better than the A’s? At least they have Brad Pitt

A .500 team out of the playoffs, not very surprising tbh

So the fact we are the youngest team in hockey, with one of the lowest payrolls, two factors that *demonstrably* predict failure (on their own! Never mind together) historically, is just a coincidence, and the reason we are *actually* bad is a bunch of shadow transactions on the the regular from Terry, uncover, pulling the strings on waiver pickups and which deals to make… come on lol. It’s the parameters! Terry is at fault for the handcuffs being imposed, and the putrid hiring record of under qualified candidates. We don’t need further explanation, an invented boogey-man of pretending Terry is actually the guy making the micro decisions: he doesn’t have to. The poor results are already guaranteed and explained by the poor hiring record, candidates which are then further limited on top of that through cap constraints - - - we’d be in the playoffs by now if Terry’s crime was caring too much. He’d have spent and spent and eventually got it right once. The problem is MUCH worse. Worse than love, worse than hate. It’s neglect.

You have it almost completely backwards. The issue with the sabres is neglect not that he’s too involved Adams’ mandate is “if you are going to be bad, at least do it on the cheap.” The purpose of the Sabres is to be cost-effective. To spend within the internal cap. We are a bad team because we spend less than everyone and are younger than everyone and those 2 things are part and parcel. it’s legitimately not rocket science. The idea Terry is obsessed with the day to day and is in the office crunching numbers and making roster decisions in the micro is utterly laughable. I don’t even know where that meme started. That’s not that’s what’s happening: he just barely gives a rats arse