Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    39,645
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. I agree. If we are good: full credit Adams If we are bad: Adams couldn’t have done any better It’s a good point
  2. Picked up right where he left off as the best player in the league from last year’s playoffs
  3. This was the year we were supposed to be able to shift these guys in to provide support to an already well-oiled machine. As of now, yet again, we are asking them the carry the mail. But, only 2 games. I’d imagine our top guys start shifting the balance a bit Whatever the number is, it’s relative to the rest of the roster Legit lol’ed
  4. We just have to start rolling with the punches a little bit
  5. They played much better today and there are guys who almost inconceivably won’t get better so I’m sure we’ll start winning at a more reasonable clip soon. Playoff team? Remains to be seen I hate Razoring out but “not a bad game”
  6. Better light Power’s fuse now, it’ll take a while
  7. I just propose the thinly veiled defences I don’t back them up with analytical data
  8. I wouldn’t say no to a few additional metapods on D to your point, I’m not sure if we have the time to fart around looking for pikachu also thanks the viridian city song is now stuck in my head
  9. But he wasn’t going to be in the opening night roster if not for Quinn, correct? So they planned on moving him, so what you say doesn’t really fit imo
  10. You know what, you are absolutely right. And I absolutely won’t
  11. The Bengals made the SB after an 0-2 start and that represented 13% of their season. The Sabres can overcome 0-2 over 82 don’t worry, I got you
  12. Because Quinn got hurt and we weren’t proactive that’s the actual answer right? It falls under the “hindsight need not apply” things like defensive supplements and backup goalie
  13. I think his point isn’t that he isn’t living up to it, merely that he hasn’t come close to earning it yet. of course, that’s sort of fundamentally baked into the deal: we are banking a lot on what he WILL be. I just think it’s a little optically “scary” in a sense in that there’s no point pretending it’s not rather on the trailblazing and pioneering end to see a guy get THAT much SO soon with so little committed to record for me, being a first overall pick does help me feel more comfortable about it. Plus, if he falls short, it won’t be by much
  14. He was our biggest offseason addition I think? So it’s a story worth following
  15. Look up over correction in the dictionary there’s a photo of Matt Duchene
  16. Otherwise known as the “Non-(terminally)onlines”
  17. That’s a great secondary assist for career point 1
×
×
  • Create New...