Isn't that part of the debate though?
Would we have chosen Ekblad over Reinhart?
McDavid would have been taken over Jack. But, is it because of McDavid we would be better in the standings or because we would have Babcock that we would be better?
So it's not the player talent as much as it is the coaching?
If we didn't get McDavid or Jack but picked third and had Marner or Strome, but again we have Babcock, would you expect this team to be better in the standings?
Whoopsie. :ph34r: