Jump to content

Trettioåtta

Members
  • Posts

    4,332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Trettioåtta

  1. It also doesn't make him right. He puts no real argument forward. It is a nothing article. There is a difference between not naming a source and hand wavingly saying 'high ranking people' or 'hockey minds' and saying one current gm said this 'quote' or one executive of an eastern conference team said 'quote'. Similarly, rather than hockey minds, he should say x said this - there is no shame is saying business savvy doesn't help a hockey team. This is assertion, you can print exact quotes or interviews without naming the person. I have no time for 'journalism' which is basically an opinion piece with pseudo-evidence
  2. I'm not ready to give up on Myers potential. There are dozens of 30 goal scorers, there are few truly amazing D-men. We are not a competing team, so I see no reason to give up elite potential for current very good players
  3. I think the fact he doesn't name his sources means the article is hard to read as investigative journalism. If his source was Brian Burke, would people still think the same - he presents it as though he has fingers in a lot of high up pies in other organisations. I'm not sure that is true - he is too small time. People here think TP is a fool for not firing Ruff and Regier, but their opinions are founded on the result of the team for the past decade. People have to realise TP said it was a clean slate when he took over. Accept that. He also has an inside look at the organisation, something no-one else does. He is a multibillionare. I trust he is a good enough businessman not let fanboyism take over his view (which is quite an arrogant and patronising view to have).
  4. Perhaps not mentally or physiologically. But he is a physically soft player. He doesn't go into the corners or the front of the net much. He is also a bit suspect when he is on defence. Vanek has the hand-eye coordination and the willingness to get dirty. Kessel has the dangling and the explosive first step. I wouldn't say no to have Kessel on the team. But I would prefer to have Vanek, Pommers or Myers over him
  5. I agree on all points. I'm so tired not sure I'll be watching this one till 3am again
  6. On Tavares? Not in anyway. He was cleanly on a breakaway. However, I think it was the right thing to do by Erhoff, it took 91 off his game and gave Miller time to prepare for a 1 on 1 in the form of a penalty shot
  7. Shocking. Another fire R&R thread/article. Yawn
  8. I thought his next start was tonight? Rumour has it he traded Miller for picks and set himself to be starting goalie. Although i'm not sure how confident he is, the goalie controls in NHL13 are difficult to get used to
  9. Second game of the year against Toronto out shot 35-20, we won 2-1. That is on Miller. Ergo 40% of our wins are in games he stole I struggle to understand how someone doesn't think Miller objectively stole 2 games. Check out Luongo's defence - i'd swap ours of theirs any day
  10. Yeah I guess it could actually. I was thinking how epic his two 5 point games where, kinda forgot how important his 2 goals and shoot-out goal were. 60% Vanek 40% Miller
  11. Miller has stolen 40% of our wins. Vanek has stolen 40% of our wins. And Montreal OT win accounts for the remaining 20%
  12. Yeah he did - and the same happened against Montreal. Weird. He had a season low 7.13 ice time
  13. We were out played all game. I don't think he does. If we had dominated the game, then maybe On the plus side he will be fresh against the Bruins. Also Brennan was benched for half the game (7 minutes of ice time). So unless Regehr is back, I think Myers plays
  14. Points are points. I'll take the last two games over the two before that. It might not b domination, but it is a win - it is moving in the right direction. We pay Miller and Vanek to be our best players, and this season they have been
  15. I think Lindy is not playing Grigo in the first two periods for a reason. He has done it couple of times now. I think he wants to use Grigo as a fresh player in the third, and take advantage of tired players
  16. Thanks Miller - 2/5 wins are thanks you and you alone
  17. Nope. 2.44 through two periods 5.16 overall Almost half as much time as usual
  18. Grigo gets an assist and has a wicked screen of the goalie. Foligno looked like he hurt himself on that play. 37-13 in shots
  19. No, no. It will be 41 more events there each year (at most) :P
  20. Normally he gets 10+ minutes, which i have no problem with
  21. Grigo - 2.44 through 40mins We should send the kid back to juniors if he wont get more time
  22. Nice shot by pommers after the goal
  23. Why did Grigo only get 1.35mins?
  24. Doesn't referencing a film quote kinda miss the point if you don't quote it?
  25. Yeah I agree. I watched their game this afternoon, they looked good. The only way it is coaching is if it is right coach for the team. Objectively most would think LR is the better coach. Our third line has had some chances and not buried them - Grigo will start to break out and bury them over the next 10-15 games I think. Hockey has a huge factor of confidence - maybe they are just playing well because they know they can? But yeah I agree, I thought this team would be a bottom 5 in the eastern conference based on the line-up and summer
×
×
  • Create New...