LGR4GM

I wouldn't trade up in this draft tbh. I think it would cost too much (GMs are greedy) and I think as good as Michkov is, the Sabres have similarish guys around so it isn't worth the risk. If Mitchkov slid all the way to say 17th... Im in.

You haven't understood what my point is. It is that using 1 game and then accusing Dahlin indirectly or directly of quitting as some sign of Tuchs leadership is a the type of confirmation bias we've had from the Tuch for captain side going back to last summer. I don't buy that argument, you put stock in Tuch never quitting. Again, we don't agree. "A Tuch lead team never quits" except for all the other teams this team did over the course of the season, like the 8 game losing streak.

Again, I know what was said. I don't put a lot of faith in the 1 game sample.

I just hoped you realized I was being facetious when I posted the "blocked" thing. I see you didn't. Shame.

🚫 and blocked. Maybe I'll see you in a few weeks.

We don't agree. Maybe you should think about that before you respond again. It isn't about semantics even though you want it to be. We simply don't agree.

Yes it resonated as confirmation bias. Tuch returned and we won so it must be him. I don't believe that.

It has to do with the common thread around here that "maybe, idk, kinda, if we have to, we can give Dahlin an A but he's not a leader" which seems to be cropping up. Dahlin already has an A. They aren't taking it away. No, it provided confirmation bias here. Everyone forgets the games Dahlin missed too.

Do ppl not realize that Dahlin is already an assistant? He already has an A.

Two things to keep in mind. Dahlin would have to agree to sign any sheet. I don't see that from him, he's not cut throat like that. Second, he would also have to get to RFA which seems unlikely. Signing him long term this summer is undoubtedly a priority.

He's been okay if I consider him a 3rd line winger. Pk skills seem okay. He needs to be quicker in short areas.

What a ridiculous comparison. Hart isn't good, I don't want him that badly. Not badly enough to trade multiple high end assets for. They want a 2nd in 2025, fine sure. Again you don't wanna talk about anything other than Hart. You think he's good, I don't.

If he's available. Really depends on what Nashville plans to do this summer. I'd trade for Swayman or offer sheet him.

Poile is retiring and if we're going to overpay, Saros is a far better idea than Hart.

Saros I did saros. For Rosen, 2024 1st, and something else. Okay so I'm only allowed to suggest players you approve of even though I specifically stated that if Nashville rebuilds, I would ask on Saros since they have Askorov. Got it. Good talk. Basically you should change the title to "let's trade for hart"

You're not going to need to wait 5 years for Quinn.

Then you're ignoring the reasons why there's a surface level similarity by doing that.

And I don't think Hart is a good enough upgrade. I provided an alternative and why he might be on time market this summer but that wasn't good enough for your thread.

Good read what I wrote again

I did

It isn't the assets, it is are you using them to trade for the a serious upgrade? Hart to me looks like an upgrade but not a really great one. If I am going to spend Rosen, a 2nd and something else, I need something more than Hart. It isn't about winning the trade per say but that Hart just isn't enough of an upgrade. For example if Nashville calls and says, we want Rosen, 2024 1st, 2023 2nd, and *insert rochester guy like Weisbach here* I am pulling that trigger. I think it is an overpayment but idc.

Saros would be the goalie I would try and target. If Nashville is rebuilding, they can get some assets for him as they won't be ready to contend again with him on this current deal. They also have Askarov in the pipe so it depends on where they see themselves the next 2 years and what they want. Rosen, a 2nd, and something else would be fine. We already gave them Asplund so maybe that helps.