Jump to content

nfreeman

SS Mod Team
  • Posts

    21,772
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nfreeman

  1. On 12/17/2023 at 6:10 PM, Thorny said:

    The fact he’s being paid more than anyone else, far and away? One would think that necessarily means they consider him our most important player, internally. Can’t see why on earth you’d give 11 million dollars to a guy if you DIDN’T think he was that, and could wear the C. It’s merely a ceremonial designation, after all. If we can’t strap the C to him after already strapping the franchise to him, what are we even doing here? Bigger problems type stuff.

     

    1 hour ago, PASabreFan said:

    I don't think it's merely ceremonial. Captains deal with officials, are the bridge between the players and coaches, are the face of the franchise in good times and bad, deal with the media and more.

    Does team success play into this at all or will it always be a matter of, They didn't put enough around him?

    I don't think it's merely ceremonial either.  Beyond the factors PA cited, I think it matters to the players in that they take their cues first and foremost from the captain.

    I also think, without doing a minute of homework, that on most teams the captain isn't the best player.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1
  2. 12 hours ago, Porous Five Hole said:

    It’s interesting how you tout McD as a good coach, but limit/ demerit Allen because he hasn’t won more playoff games. Has Allen been the problem aside from the Texans hero ball game that they lost in OT? I would be interested in your follow up…

    11 hours ago, JujuFish said:

    And nfreeman responded to comments about Allen being the best. There's a difference between "great" and "best".

    27 minutes ago, Night Train said:

     Those TEAMS as a whole were far better than these Bills teams. Not even close in overall talent level. 

     Plus the AFC was weak overall,  back in those 4 SB years. I can remember beating Denver 10-7 in the AFC title game on a Carlton Bailey INT return for the only TD.  Not every playoff win was 51-3, a week after Bo Jackson was permanently done. 

     Kelly is the most successful QB. Kemp played well here the first 3-4 years here before the team aged and sank to the bottom. 

     Allen is the most talented by a mile and needs a better roster around him.

    IMHO, McD and JA are both great, but need to win quite a few more playoff games before they displace Marv and Jimbo.

    Jimbo was 9-8 in the playoffs.  JA is 4-4.  Five more playoff wins is meaningful IMHO.

    I don't agree that the Marv-Kelly teams were a juggernaut, other than the 1990 team that lost to the Giants in the SB, although it is true that there was no opponent on the level every year of Mahomes' Chiefs.  Still, they had to beat Elway's Broncos, Marino's Dolphins, Montana's Chiefs and Moon's Oilers.

    And while JA has had some scintillating playoff performances, he's also had not great outings vs Houston in 2019, Baltimore in 2020 and both Miami and Cincy last year.

    Only one can be the best.  At this point IMHO it's still Marv and Jimbo.

  3. 1 hour ago, Crusader1969 said:

    Great ??? There is now way he is great. I'll give him pretty good for the first 58 mins of a game.   In close games in the last 2 mins he is down right awful 

    If hes great what are the guys that recently out coached him in playoff games. -Reid  (KC) and Taylor (CIN)?

    Well, I think most NFL observers would say Reid is a great coach.  He's accomplished more as a HC than McD has, but Reid's been a HC for 25 years, while McD has been one for 7.

    Taylor is pretty well regarded too, although he has a career losing record.  It's not crazy to say he outcoached McD in the playoffs last year, but I don't think that it's inarguable either.  The Bills had a very difficult year last year, with a number of very unusual events hanging over them.  Could a different coach have righted the ship and beaten Cincy in the playoffs?  Possibly, but I don't think we can be sure either way.

    I too would like to see better and sharper end-of-game execution, and it's fair to hold McD accountable (although several of the end-of-game debacles have been freak occurrences that I don't think it's fair to blame him for -- the Kyler Murray hail mary, JA's fumble in the end zone vs Minny, etc.).  I just think that that is one of many elements that a coach should be evaluated on, and that he shines in most of them.

    Let's see what happens this year.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Doohickie said:

    If he was a great coach, 13 seconds would not have happened.

    If he weren't a great coach, they'd still be going 7-9 every year.

    The Bills were the biggest joke in the NFL for 17 freaking years.  The stink of loserville was deeply ingrained in the franchise.  He pulled them out of it. 

    And this year, when they were on the ropes, he did what needed to be done in firing Dorsey and he got the team to rally and beat KC on the road and throttle one of the hottest teams in the league yesterday.

    There's another franchise in town that could sorely use a guy like McD.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Eyeroll 1
    • Agree 1
  5. On 12/14/2023 at 3:40 PM, PerreaultForever said:

    So you think he's worth Nylander/Reinhart money? Really?

    Oh it can "work" but does he give you enough for that money? I don't see him at that level. 

    Nylander and Reino are going to get much bigger deals than Mitts will.

    The second point, and your separate one about continuing to commit to guys that haven't done anything as a team, are both completely valid and echo my concerns about giving Mitts a fat extension as well.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  6. 15 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

    When I watch the enthusiasm Tuch has after a big win and he does his version of a goalie hug, I just think anyone else, even Dahlin, would be a huge mistake. 

    Both times the team stunk bad and then rebounded this year the 2 guys that really seemed to step it up were Tuch and Cozens. So my view is the same as it was before this year started. Tuch captain, Dahlin and Cozens assistants. 

    I think Dahlin would make a fine captain, but I agree that it's gotta be Tuch.  He brings the fire, the speed and the inspiration -- I think they rally around him more than they do for Dahlin.  They are noticeably better when he's in the lineup (as is the case with Dahlin, of course).  I also agree with your alternates.

     

    14 hours ago, Thorny said:

    Ya I’d go with Dahlin personally, not really a hard choice. He’s already our best player and will be here longer, and in his prime for the duration of his contract

    Also don’t really want the added pressure to lock up a guy who’ll be on the downside of his career because he’s captain, may even run into an Okposo situation 

     Now this is a fair point.  Tuch has 2 more seasons after this one on his contract, after which he'll be a UFA at age 30.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 1 hour ago, PASabreFan said:

    The gut: Levi. I'm coming around to the swagger this team needs.

    The head: not so sure. Smarter people than I will have to advise on the difficulty of playing back to back road games in goal.

    I don't think they should play Levi tonight, but I am pretty encouraged with his play since returning from Rochester.  He's starting to look, as he did last year, like the prince that was promised.  And the team certainly responded to him last night.

    Unfortunately, both of the contenders for #2 have royally pooped the bed in 100% of their outings lately.

    Come on Sabres.  Play hard from the drop and win tonight and hope lives.  Show up in a coma and get dusted again...I don't wanna think about it.

  8. If they stay mired way below DeLuca .500 -- ie if the games are meaningless -- I will watch fewer and fewer of them as the season wears on.

    I won't stop caring about this team, which is in my blood, though unless and until it becomes clear to me that they have stopped trying to be a real NHL franchise.  If they end up well out of the playoff race this year and don't bring in a new coach with a legit NHL track record next summer, I will probably come to that conclusion (I was originally thinking New Year's was the deadline, but @Brawndo may have convinced me to wait until after the season).

    Either way, it freaking stinks that here we are again, well before New Year's, and the season is probably over already.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  9. 14 minutes ago, inkman said:

    I would be shocked and thrilled if the first digit in Casey’s salary was a 5.  

    I'm not expecting this either, which is why I posted yesterday.  I am pretty skeptical about committing to the kind of contract that I think it will take to keep him.  I think there is a limit to the number of big-dollar forwards a team can have, and I hate the idea of losing, say, Quinn or JJP because they gave Mitts too much $$.

    • Agree 1
  10. I am a longtime Mittelstadt skeptic, so take this with as much salt as you like:  I think he's been pretty bad during this last 2-week stretch, in which the Sabres have pretty much punted their season away (before last night, the Sabres had lost 5 out of 6, to drop to 6 below DeLuca .500).

    In the last 7 games, Mitts has 2 pts despite playing over 22 min per game most nights and getting top PP usage.

    More importantly, "dumb Casey" has IMHO reclaimed his prime spot in Mitts' game -- he makes bad decisions with the puck and turns it over pretty much every time he gets it in the O-zone.  I don't think he created a single chance last night.

    Both he and Cozens -- who are supposed to be battling for the #2C spot and be team mainstays -- have spit out the bit right when the Sabres really need them.  But Cozens is already under contract, so there is no decision to be made with him.

    I don't see how they can possibly give Mitts a contract in the ballpark of Cozens' deal. 

  11. Wow.  I went to bed when Miami went up by 7 with 6 minutes left!

    So if the Bills keep winning and Miami loses one more before they host the Bills at the end of the season, that game will be for the division.

    The Bills may or may not win enough to get in, but they won't quit.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  12. Let the record reflect that they showed up and played very hard for McD and, despite more injuries on D, grinded out a win they had to have against a very good team in a very difficult place to win.

    The grass always seems greener but it usually isn’t.

    McD is tough and honorable, albeit flawed, and so is his team.  It’s not a coincidence.

    • Like (+1) 4
  13. This is likely an overreaction to the last few weeks’ worth of bad news surrounding the Bills, but it does kinda feel like the game tomorrow marks somewhat of a crossroads.

    i think they are going to show up and play hard for McD.  We’ll see whether they execute well enough. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  14. 3 hours ago, Crusader1969 said:

    I think you can under the guise of "load management" 

    Well, maybe, but that kinda seems like an obvious fig leaf.  Are you aware of any teams that have done this?

     

    2 hours ago, irregularly irregular said:

    Shouldn't the captain be the first person stepping forward to do what is best for the team? It should come from Kyle or does it come down to DG making it happen?

    This isn't realistic IMHO.  Similarly -- are you aware of any instances of this happening?

  15. 55 minutes ago, French Collection said:

    They don’t want to disrespect him but are probably thinking about maintenance days coming for KO. The first sign of soreness would be a perfect time to rest him.

    I've been thinking about this.  KO is pretty much out of gas and adds very little value most nights.  If he weren't the captain, he'd almost certainly be in the healthy-scratch rotation.  But I think it's still a pretty firm rule that you don't healthy-scratch your captain.

    • Agree 2
  16. 12 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

    I'm wondering if you mean offensively, scoring, or in his complete game? I was referring to the latter, while I know many of the Quinn fans here are looking primarily at his point total. Peterka last year showed me signs of grit and fortitude, determination, drive, and even a little 2 way ability. All of that matters to me and is why I had him above Quinn and still do. Was Quinn a better complete player in your opinion? 

    It's quite possible Quinn will put up bigger scoring numbers than Peterka in the future, but I'm not convinced he will be a better hockey player. 

    I was referring to Quinn's complete game.  I agree that JJP is more powerful and I think he may end up scoring more pts (and probably will end up scoring more goals), but I think Quinn has a higher hockey IQ and, last year, played a better 200-foot game than JJP. 

    To be clear, I really like both of them and think they will both have really good careers.  I also think they can complement each other well as linemates, although it will be Quinn who more often figures out, on the fly, how to get more out of his linemates than JJP will.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thanks (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...