Jump to content

nfreeman

SS Mod Team
  • Posts

    22,117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nfreeman

  1. 37 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

    So Adams apparently is signed for another year and nobody knew. So Sabres. 

    Now I give the opinion that nobody will like. Bring on the thumbs down and vomit emojis.

    Fire Adams outright - gone. No explanation necessary. 

    Fire Ruff. Historical figure but let's face it, he's done a s##t job in his return. We've fired ex-Sabres before and some of them were good coaches (eg. Craig Ramsey)

    Fire all the assistants. They're all garbage and Ruff let them do too much and thus we are same. 

    Name Jarmo GM.

    Now for the vomit part.

    Jarmo hires Tortorella as coach. 

    Torts gives us hours of endless soundbites and entertainment while identifying all the slackers and we clear the rot out. Slash and burn and rebuild the culture.

    2 years from now we fire Torts and the new guy moves things forward and into the playoffs with an identity and actual hockey culture in full force. 

    Think of it like this. Team has cancer. Bandages aren't enough. Minor surgery won't solve it. they need full chemo. Then we see if they have the will to survive.

    I'd sign up for this.

    • Thanks (+1) 1
  2. 2 hours ago, Pimlach said:

    if Adams is shown the door and is out, and Jarmo takes over, then Jarmo should be free to bring in whatever assistants, advisors, and coaches that he wants.   If he is not then he should not even consider the job.  

    If Adams is moved to another position within Hockey Ops, and Jarmo is the GM, then I do not think that very much will change.  

    I've been thinking about Jarmo's perspective on this.  He got canned by CBJ in February of 2024, which gave him 1.5 seasons, and 2 off-seasons, to get a GM job.  When he didn't get one, he took the Sabres' gig at the end of May of 2025.

    He almost certainly still wants to be a GM somewhere, which is why he took this job -- i.e. it was pretty obvious that KA was running out of chances, and this job would put him in the on-deck circle if KA were to be fired.

    But still:  he has to know that if the only change is KA out, Jarmo in -- he is doomed to fail, and probably won't ever get another shot at a GM job.  So, would he take the job under those conditions, because it's a bird in the hand, albeit a crippled and decrepit bird?  Or would he say thanks but no thanks and go home to cool his heels and wash off the Sabres stink until a better opportunity comes along?

    Or:  is he perhaps negotiating, even as we speak, the terms -- salary cap spend, front office turnover, coaching staff turnover -- under which he will agree to take the job?  And if so, does TP maybe want no part of a GM search, and does he maybe want Jarmo to take this mess off his hands and restore his good name in the NHL enough, to give Jarmo enough of what he needs to get Jarmo to take the job?

    I'm guessing this is what is going on -- TP wants Jarmo to take the job and they are negotiating the terms.  Jarmo knows he can't overplay his hand, but at the same time he doesn't want to step into an unworkable situation.

    Please give him what he wants Terry.  We're still here on your team's message board after a ridiculous number of terrible years.  At this point you kinda owe us a real GM with a real budget.

    • Like (+1) 7
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  3. 17 hours ago, Taro T said:

    They're at NHL 0.500.  They have 6 teams to leap frog to get into the playoffs.  NHL 0.500 only gets you to 82 points which even in a weirdly low points total season will still miss the playoffs by a wide margin.

    The "real" 0.500 doesn't have any bearing on whether they make the playoffs or not.

    Get to NHL 0.600 and they'll be in.  Regardless of whether they end up with no additional OTLs or get 16 more.

     

    Well, we both know that NHL .500 is a freaking joke and is utterly meaningless.  And I've already admitted that you are right that 0.600 points percentage is more accurate than real .500. 

    However:

    - Real .500 is very closely correlated with making/missing the playoffs -- i.e. teams that finish below real .500 very seldom make it and teams that finish above it usually make it (and teams that are 2 over almost always make it). 

    - For example, last season, every team that was above real .500 made the playoffs, and every team that was below real .500 missed the playoffs (except one -- the Habs, who were 1 game under).

    - There is NFW that I am going to mentally keep track of the number of games this pathetic franchise has played -- so I am not going to be able to determine where they are relative to .600 points percentage without checking the standings -- which is more effort than I'm prepared to dedicate to them at present.  But I can remember pretty easily where they are relative to real .500.

    So while I won't criticize your purist approach on this, I'm not going to adopt it either.  The quick-and-dirty approach works almost as well and is much easier -- and this franchise doesn't deserve any better just yet.

     

    • Thanks (+1) 1
  4. They're currently 4 under real .500, which means they will miss the playoffs by a considerable margin.  They need to go 4-2 on this roadie to get to 2 under.  Then we can start to daydream about gradually working their way up to 2 over and a Lindy redemption story.  Any worse than 4-2 and all that's happened is that they are 6 games closer to missing the playoffs by a mile yet again.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thanks (+1) 1
  5. They are 4 under .500 with a high likelihood of being 5 under in a few hours -- and it's Nov. 8.

    Their best player has left the team indefinitely (and understandably -- God bless him and his family) and their next 2 best players are having mediocre starts.

    Their goaltending started off better than expected and has now started to stink again.

    They could be 10 under by Thanksgiving real easy, and at that point the season will be unquestionably over.

    If that happens, will everyone get fired?

  6. That was an exciting game.

    Power makes infuriatingly soft plays on the regular but also makes quite a few nice plays.

    Dahlin looks distracted, understandably enough, but in any case is nowhere near his best.

    Quinn and Östlund were really bad to start the game but hung in there and had a number of nice shifts as the game went on.  I think though they are both too soft to play with each other.  I'd like to see Östlund with Doan and Tuch and McLeod with Quinn and Zucker.

    Kulich is out of his depth on the top line.

    Lyon was sturdy for the most part but the 2nd goal, from the blue line, was lousy, and the 3rd one wasn't great either albeit deflected.

    Still:  they are 2 under .500, with 2 consecutive losses, and they need to get some wins.

    • Like (+1) 3
  7. 3 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

    True to a point. Your defense will ruin good goaltending if it keeps giving up high danger chances. Watch any game last year's and tell me how many odd man rushes off turnovers you see. Then compare to now.

    And as for who is or isn't a moron, finding good goaltending isn't like buying groceries. It's like complaining the Bills didn't just go out and get a Josh Allen earlier.

    You cannot seriously think that Adams has not terribly mishandled the goalie position during his tenure here.

    20-21 -- Ullmark, Tokarski, Hutton -- let's give him a pass for inheriting a very difficult situation with Krueger, Covid and a belt-tightening owner.  

    21-22 -- after butchering the Ullmark contract and losing him to Boston, where he shines, KA goes with Craig Anderson, Tokarski and Dell.  Grade:  F

    22-23 -- UPL, Anderson, Comrie.  Comrie was the shiny new toy, who crashed and burned, leaving us with mediocrities in UPL (.891, 3.61) and Anderson (.908, 3.06).  Grade:  F

    23-24 -- It was supposed to be wunderkind Levi, but he couldn't handle it, so UPL got the #1 job and had the best year of his career.  Comrie was bad again.  Grade:  inadvertent B.

    24-25 -- UPL got a big contract before the season and promptly pooped the bed with .887 and 3.20 in 55 games.  Reimer, the definition of "journeyman", was better and took over down the stretch.  Grade:  F

    That's 3 Fs, a lucky B, a charitable incomplete in his 1st season and an incomplete in his 6th season.  And it wasn't because it couldn't be helped.

     

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 4
    • Thanks (+1) 2
  8. I hate myself for caving so quickly, but I'm reading this GDT and I'm watching the game tonight.

    I have NP at all with Lindy dressing a designated fighter.  Of course it would be better if the team had enough guts and toughness throughout the roster to make it unnecessary, but they don't.  They've been mentally broken for some time now.  This is designed to address that.  It may not be effective, but I have no problem with trying to address it.

    Who TF is Dunne?

    Go Sabres.  Next stop, DeLuca .500.

     

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Disagree 1
  9. TP isn't firing anyone tonight.

    But at some point he will have to act.  The pressure, including from the NHL, will be too great.

    The question is when will the camel's back break.

    If they start the season, say, 0-10?  I think KA and Lindy are gone.

    But what if it's just 0-6?  Or 1-9 with a couple of OTLs?

    We all know the answer:  TP will stall and delay and hem and haw until Thanksgiving, or New Year's, or the Spring for that matter.

    In the meantime, everyone can see that the wheels are falling off, and it's a question of when, not if.

    Thanks for another great season, Terry and Kevyn!  Great job!

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 4
  10. 13 hours ago, RPop said:

    What’s up with Roslovic ? Seems to be a FA that the Sabres could fit in at $3.5m.. flexible to play C. Issues around attitude seem to be brought up. Best available player at a position of need 🤷🏻‍♂️

    And, I believe, drafted by Winnipeg with a first-rounder provided by Tim Murray in the ill-fated Evander Kane trade.  So maybe GMTM still has a chance to win that one?

    • Haha (+1) 2
  11. Serious question:  wasn't it just like a week or 2 ago that the Sabres were crawling with young, talented, highly-drafted forwards (some of which were supposed to be consolation prizes for being forced to trade Eichel and Reinhart)?  But now there is a big hole in the top 6 and not enough offense?  

    It kinda feels like when Botteril accumulated too many RHDs, then squandered them via terrible GMing, leaving a hole at RHD.

×
×
  • Create New...