Jump to content

Ghost of Dwight Drane

Members
  • Posts

    9,934
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ghost of Dwight Drane

  1. Objectively, do you you really think he was worse than Bogo tonight?

    Where is the horse we saw last year?

    Terry Murray needs to teach Zach to box out.

    Bogosian has been horrible.

     

    Actually, all the guys who thrived under Nolan have been bad.

     

    Girgensons, Ennis, Bogosian, Moulson....

     

    Not sure if it is Bylsma, but it is a much less physical crew. No penalties mandate?

     

    Bogosian had a long injury with setbacks so not sure what the deal is. He's been disappointing though.

  2. Interesting. I was rooting for him to get the game tying goal and then the game winner.

     

    5 seconds?

     

    He wasn't on the ice for most of the empty net and jumped on with 30 or so seconds. I had just looked up the stats because I was pretty sure he was on the ice for all the goals and I wasn't too impressed that as the game got chippy and Calgary divebombed our goalie, Ristolainen waited for the guy to get up and gave him a Queen's Wave of a push.

     

    Love his offense, but he has to decide if he wants to be a bigboy defenseman, or 1 part Ehrhoff and 1 part Myers but with a more accurate shot.

  3. I'm willing to bet that Peel and Neal had an exchange of F-bombs earlier.

     

    My guess is Neal did a little acting earlier on and was warned. Neal then went on a rant, continually throwing jabs at Peel. That's why Peel seems to start the conversation off with an F-bomb, when in fact it was a continuation of an on going bitch sesson by Neal, and the reason Peel was responding with such testy-ness.

    Thank you.

     

    Here's the deal.....

     

    You can't bitch about concussions and fighting in hockey, then bitch about refs who have to jump in with no defense in order to prevent brutal fights and concussions because they drop a bad word at a guy who has a history of putting refs' personal safety at risk because of their antics.

  4. Thanks boss. Good to have you again. For now... No need to feel bad for us. Well maybe PTR but that's a different story. I'd be more worried as a Bills STH which I gave up a few years ago. They are the ones about to take it on the chin now. And again, and again in a buildup to an apocalyptic price change when a new stadium is built in Pegulaville.

    I will say if the price keeps going like it has for Sabres they will hit a problem but it will adjust after the next lockout just as it did for the last one.

    I've had to eat late season Bills tickets for years.

    I've made it for 2 decades but if they have to blow it up like the Sabres...that's maybe it. It's a lot easier paying up for 8 (10) games than 41 though at the same average price per game.

     

    Does Russ Brandon do a call in show? I'd like to ask him a few things now that he runs the Sabres.

     

    Maybe one day we'll all get rewarded.

  5. A billionaire charters a flight for sponsors of his football team and that links directly to season ticket prices the following season for his hockey team?

    OK, whatever.

    Hey....I LOVE that Pegula is the owner of the Bills from a season ticket holder standpoint. I sold 5 games and it more than paid for the season. Gave the rest away and am sitting on the Jets in case it means something.

     

    I just feel bad for thr Sabres holders.

  6. I'm wondering what the season ticket price increase will be next year?

     

    I know it is Pegula's duty to the future owner to raise ticket prices on mom and pop even though the product is historically awful.

     

    I was in the penalty box when this golden nugget happened and couldn't comment.

     

     

    http://bills.buffalonews.com/2015/10/21/vip-flight-propels-bills-faithful-to-london-in-style/

     

    I mean chartered overseas flight, posh 5 star hotel, meals and transport, suite tickets...for 80+ people.

     

    Let's see, 16,000 season ticket holders,5% price increase at an average of $120 or so per ticket.....

     

    Yeah....that should cover it.

     

     

    Pot stirring? Sure....

     

    Food for thought? Hope so.

  7. Isn't that what tanking pretty much was all about?

    An educated gamble?

     

    For every Chicago and Tampa there is an Edmonton and a Florida.

     

    We're probably going to need a Hossa trade, a Keith 2nd rounder and/or a Johnson sleeper pick.

     

    People want you to believe otherwise, but there is a certain amount of luck involved.

    For sure, but Murray had little choice. The franchise was a disaster.

     

    My guess is that Murray takes much more pride and thinks he can build a winner easier by taking value guys in the draft. He is a pure scout. If you don't think you have an advantage over the guy next to you because of your eye, then you shouldn't be in the game.

     

    There is no value in tanking from a GM standpoint. A blind monkey in cement shoes can make those picks.

     

    The value is in trading for guys like Kane and Bogosian who are born leaders with talent but have been mismanaged and giving up nice fellas with head problems.

     

    The value is in getting a guy at 20 who should have gone 8.

     

    Sorry for the horseracing terms, but Murray himself said he'd rather talk horses than hockey. He also said the best chance to win the big race is to spread the budget over a handful of nice horses rather than relying one big horse at the top.

  8. Murrays core is

    Eichel, Reinhart, OReilly, Kane, Zemgus, Risto, Bogo, Lehner and an LD to be named later.

    Only one who is playing at that level is ROR, though Kane and Risto may be there by season's end.

     

    Will be interesting to see how patient Murray is with that group.

    This is fair. If the kids don't develop Murray will look like a chump. They pretty much have to be the core 3 years from now.

     

    On that note, I just saw a horse at Zia Park that was purchased for 1 million run for maiden claiming.

  9. I'm assuming you aren't big gamblers? That would change your options as good perks could get you close to a free stay.

     

    I fully endorse Mirage. Maybe the best overall balance and value of the big name places. Location is decent.

     

    I would avoid Rio. Not to say you can't have a positive experience, but between being secluded and adding the riff raff that tends to be there it isn't in my top 30.

     

    The best overall to me is Paris. Same price range as Mirage but a little more central. It has a clean feel and the gambling floor is pleasant and not overcrowded. It's very lady friendly too. The Eiffel Tower, outside cafe, french bakery. And you are across the street from Bellagio, so if you pull out a tenskie to give to the check in clerk, there is a good chance of getting a high floor with a view of the strip and fountain. Paris is an easy walk to a lot of the other big places. It's connected to Ballys which is where I stay on a guy trip, and the rooms are half as much while being on the same property, but with a lady the extra 80 a night at Paris hopefully pays for itself.

     

    Make sure right after check in you get signed up for players club cards and use then when you gamble. The old law of vegas was to comp 30% in freebies back to the customer based on their expected loss for games played. Your wife spins a 1 dollar slot 10 times a minute for 4 hours, she's supposed to lose 250 bucks and at an old school place you are getting 75 bucks back in a combo of food, room and play. It's not as good on the strip as corporations took over, but if you guys bring a budget to potentially lose more than a few dollars, talk to a host and maybe you get a buffet trip, or some free tickets to a show on a weekday.

     

    Maybe Brian Blessing could hook you up as a Sabres fan.

     

    I'm laying -650 he at least reads this board.

  10. Of course, had they held onto a healthier mix of the right guys ... .

     

    Now I too am sad.

    That's the key.

     

    If Eichel puts on 20 lbs and is willing to take a beating in the next few years, yeah, he's in your core and your best player. Vanek drove to the net and took slashes as a rookie.

     

    If Ristolainen plays a tough defensive game and doesn't avoid being decisive in his decisions then he will be in your core. Remember when people here were lobbying for Tallinder to get Norris votes?

     

    If Reinhart keeps progressing and is sturdy in his d and disruptive in front of the net then sure he is a valuable member of the core. Right now he's probably safe to be a Jochen Hecht, but he is improving.

     

    Murray knows what he's doing.

  11. Only if you're pushing the timetable. In three years, that logic flips. Eichel, Risto and Reinhart are your core. ROR is still prominent. Kane is only here still if he's scoring. Bogo will be banged up and slowing down but hopefully still effective. Girgs is here centering the third line, fighting of some younger guy for the job.

    All those guys will still be in their mid late 20s. Their style of game is so much more important.

     

    You just need look back. You roll the dice on Vanek, Pominville and Tallinder....you let Dumont, Grier, and McKee walk. It was over before it started, and even still having Drury and Briere couldn't stop the plane from stalling.

     

    Presidents Trophy or Stanley Cup?

     

    And I am sorry to have insulted Vanek, Pominville and Tallinder as odds are they will end up with more successful careers than the 3 people currently here. I would settle for the same type of career as long as Murray sticks to his plan.

  12. If you are going to win a cup, then your core right now is O'Reilly, Kane, Bogosian, and Girgensons.

     

    If you are just happy getting in the playoffs on a consistant basis then you throw in names like Eichel, Ristolainen and maybe Reinhart.

     

    The first 4 can win it without the last 3 but not vice versa.

     

    Guys like Gorges and Deslauriers to go with the first 4 are what will get you a Cup.

  13. Rick's been called a homer, but not calling the opponent's goals is the height of homerism, and very bush league. I really hate it.

     

    Also Yeichel > Jumpin Jack Flash.

    I think "McHorsef##ker Frycakes!"is a much better call for Eichel.

     

    Maybe RJ can do it his last week in the booth.

  14. "Booooone Jenner".....

     

    I like him. He would probably be more creative if he wasn't filling in for a local legend. In all honesty, I like the broadcast team from top to bottom. I would love to be stranded in a hotel bar for a weekend blizzard in Winnipeg with these guys. The off the record stories would be off the charts.

×
×
  • Create New...