-
Posts
15,544 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ...
-
Did you see that!?
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
These refs are high. Calling a penalty against Ovechkin.
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
They called a boarding against the Caps? No way. Fire that ref.
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
This is why we can't have shut-outs.
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
J ohnso n Spoils a gr eat nigh t .
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Foligno was boarded shortly before all of that, no call and no response.
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ovechkin elbows Gorges in the head, and puts a stick in Ennis' face all in the same play. And where is our response?
- 456 replies
-
- gdt
- Washington
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
See! Look, there you are. You have no idea what the facts are, yet, somehow, E. Kane made a poor choice. It's already started. He may have done nothing wrong but, to you, his rep is already sullied due to this information being leaked. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
I'm not talking about the report of the leak, but the leak itself. The information about the investigation should be considered privileged and that prematurely disclosing that information should be subject to prosecution. I understand "defamation" itself is difficult to establish, but I don't believe the legal understanding of defamation covers situations like these and needs to be amended/reconsidered/redefined. It's simply ridiculous to accept the current reality of the seriousness of the charge out-weighing the nature of the evidence and/or the facts. I thought we might have learned from Salem witch trials. It's not news-worthy; it's sensationalism with the only real purpose being to draw readers/viewers. What interest would you or I or anyone else have in this case had the investigation remained under wraps and went no-where like P. Kane's did? Little, especially after the fact. If all we had heard about P. Kane was that someone accused him of rape but the DA felt there wasn't a case worth pursuing, what would the public opinion of P. Kane be then? I would think it would be FAR less vitriolic and divisive than it is now, and ultimately less interesting. It would be a minor footnote to the P. Kane story than a major pock-mark. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Note that I did not say the leak itself was defamation, but rather instigated defamation. I think someone creative might come up with a way to argue that information like this is privileged and the premature public disclosure of this type of information is extremely harmful. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
This is why I advocated P. Kane sue whomever leaked the investigation into his case - to make an example of what happens when you instigate defamation of a person. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
This is so fu%king stupid...and tragic. The DA, or someone with authority, needs to crack down on leaks like this. There is no reason for the public to know unless he is charged. Now someone is giving WKBW, I think it was, pictures of Kane's vehicle being towed. Someone needs an ass-whipping and a lesson on how to keep quiet. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
TBN must have got a readership bump for the other Kane spectacle, so they run with this. Slimy bastards. -
Still, like I said on the page prior, Gorges saved the game right after it was 4-3. He needs to be star number 4 if he's not 3.
-
This is the kind of thing we need to see more often. Learning. To. Win.
-
Shooting gallery!
-
Go for the hat trick!
-
Gorges saves the game.
-
McGinn does well on any line.
-
What a come back.
-
Pretty!
-
off topic Star Wars - now with SPOILERS! (Read at your own risk)
... replied to Robviously's topic in The Aud Club
-
off topic Star Wars - now with SPOILERS! (Read at your own risk)
... replied to Robviously's topic in The Aud Club
Just got back from seeing it. I give it a 9/10. The only thing missing were my 7 year old eyes and mind, but I did the best I could. Easily on par with Episode 4 in terms of the flow and energy. I thought the drama was well balanced against the action and comedic moments. I didn't have high expectations for, what is it, BB2 (I'm on my iPod and don't have the patience to verify), but that character was well done. I, for one, appreciated the various nods to the old movies. If it works, use it, and I think all of the nods were tastefully executed. This included character and convention references, and any story and plot parallels there were. Everyone agrees it looks fantastic, but I think it sounded great as well. Love the revving Tie Fighter FX. I didn't look to see if John Williams worked on score additions, but even those nods I liked. If I had any criticism it might be that the soundtrack was underplayed compared to episodes 4-6. -
Ho ho ho. Santa was here.
-
Ryan O'Who? Damn, ROR and Samson are clutch.
- 469 replies