Jump to content

SwampD

Member
  • Posts

    30,900
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SwampD

  1. 2 minutes ago, Alaska John said:

    The Sabres while still mathematically alive are clearly not going to make the playoffs.  Facing facts, they should be tanking to get the best draft position possible.  And based on the third period against Edmonton, it looks like the Sabres got that memo.

    It would be better not to bring any Rochester players up so they're not in the locker room while this is going on.  Toxicity is contagious.

    When will this notion just go away? 

  2. 2 minutes ago, K-9 said:

    I appreciate the perspective, but it just seems we are just so much worse than last season. That’s what happens under the weight of raised expectations when players just can’t handle it. Raised expectations should fuel a team though. Remember the syrupy letter to the fans by Okposo before the season. The one where he said the guys are embracing the pressure? It’s laughable now.

    That's what happens when you see starting goal tenders because of last year.

    1 minute ago, Thorny said:

    It wasn’t so much perspective on this season as perspective on last, imo. We weren’t that good, and the 8 in 11 stretch to end clouded judgment, fans and GM. This year we are even worse than not good and it’s double as bad because it’s year 4, but we absolutely absolutely can’t fall for a run it back trick this time 

    ugh.

    • Agree 1
  3. 4 hours ago, Doohickie said:

    If getting outshot 18-8 in the third period is shutting them down then yes, that's exactly what the Sabres did.  Once again UPL earned a star.  I will say, though, that the Kraken effort in the third was typical of post-tank Sabres:  Lots of shots from the outside; Oopie only had to make a couple tough ones.

    Score effects.

    The Sabres shut them down.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. Punctuation. It’s just not that difficult.

    He who shall not be named has posts where if you add commas or periods in different places you can come up with up to 5 different meanings. I stopped trying until he does.

    3 hours ago, thewookie1 said:

    Well I just looked that up since I'm 99% certain you are speaking of me.

    Holy *****, I never even knew that

    Would've = Would have obviously but Would of = Is akin to "wood of a tree" and while speaking aloud it makes sense doesn't read correctly. Hopefully I remember this for future posts 🙂

    You are an honorable man for posting this. 

    13 minutes ago, Weave said:

    The best part is, until just now I dod not get the reference to “weave” in shrader’s post.

    noone - no one

    potato - potato

    wait…… nevermind

    Wow. Me, too.

×
×
  • Create New...