SarasotaSabre

"Chris Wallace and I must have been talking past each other".....uhhhh, not so much Hillary. Weak sauce.

in the famous words of Vince Lombardi, ......"what the hell is going on out here?" Josh Earnest: " “We know that Iran supports Hezbollah and the Assad regime, and it is certainly possible that some of the money that Iran has is being used for those purposes, too.” Fantastic..... http://yalibnan.com/2016/08/04/us-admits-that-400-million-iran-received-in-cash-could-fund-terrorism/ I did not know Doonesbury was posting here - funny in a trite way if not overly simplistic and stereotypical

Ne'o: my response was in no way to infer "I trumped you" with my earlier post..... I was merely seeking to add my own context/opinion of "nothing to see here, no coincidence, no quid pro quo, move along now." If nothing else, the optics look horribly bad and were made worse by Kirby's denial this AM. Beavis: "I trumped you....." ...... :w00t:

please see my post #22017 @ 9:23p last night...... nothing to see here, no coincidence, no quid pro quo, move along now .....or cankles - :w00t: :w00t:

there we go boys .....!! the info from these links may answer your questions: http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/ http://usuncut.com/politics/debbie-wasserman-schultz-hillary-clinton/ http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-23/leaked-dnc-emails-confirm-democrats-rigged-primary-reveal-extensive-media-collusion

and of a rigged primary..... http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/wasserman-schultz-resigns-dnc-chairwoman-served-class-action-lawsuit-rigging-primary/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=im

I do not condone Trump's reaction to Khan - in any way, shape, or form. In an effort to be intellectually honest, do you have any problem with the DNC trotting out the Khans w/ the backdrop of their fallen son to gin things up, then having him throw an incendiary bomb at Trump BY NAME ?? I am not asking for a moral equivalency, FYI.

thank you Eleven, I will research further. I do not want to point fingers at Khan w/out verifiable fact-checking.

sorry Joe, I'm on West coast time and did not properly position my statement. A couple things upfront; as I said before Trump could/should have engaged the Khans in a more tactful manner, although it is clear Khan threw the first grenade with a full frontal assault (....the handy pocketbook Constitution prop was well-staged & well-played). There is no way IMHO Trump should have questioned Mrs. Khan's ability to speak. So I'll be clear: if you read my post from 4:26am, I never made a statement connecting or referencing their fallen son w/ Trump's anti-Muslim rhetoric. My earlier post, if I may expand on it, was meant to investigate the validity of the Khans being used as pawns by the DNC in an obvious attempt to bait Trump while pointing out the backdrop of Khan's background in the selling of US citizenships, which is why he deleted his law firm website that specialized in Muslim immigration. Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/08/khizr-khan-is-immigration-lawyer-specializes-in-visa-programs-accused-of-selling-us-citizenship.html/#sthash.zfw2NRFK.dpuf

did you read this link carefully? http://pamelageller.com/2016/08/khizr-khan-is-immigration-lawyer-specializes-in-visa-programs-accused-of-selling-us-citizenship.html/

I agree with the bolded, but it still does not square up with Khan's shady practices which have come to light.

ruh roh Shaggy - looks like that honorable Khan family is not the venerable representatives the DNC would have you think they might be (....yes, despite the terrible loss of their son in combat): http://pamelageller.com/2016/08/khizr-khan-deletes-law-firm-website-that-specializes-in-muslim-immigration-accused-of-selling-us-citizenships.html/#comment-781789 whoops

Fantastic - more chicanery with Iran; "no coincidence", nothing to see here, move along. More bullschitt, whether it's from the left or the right: http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-sent-cash-to-iran-as-americans-were-freed-1470181874

Sorry guys, yesterday was an all-day travel day for me so I am late getting back to the party..... Hank for President ...???? Eleven; I'll take a stab at answering your prior 3 questions

thanks 11 ! re: #1: I forgot Cambria repped Pat Kane - that should have told me something re: #2: I was totally unaware of Cambria's involvement in the "adult entertainment" biz; indeed, that makes my pun funnier

yikes - http://my.xfinity.com/articles/sports-nhl/20160801/HKN-Sabres-Kane-Investigation/?cid=featuredsports_media_Kane anyone know Cambria's bona fides & if he has the chops to get Kane off? (....no pun intended) anyone have inside info on GMTM's potential efforts to work the phones and ship him out? (N.B., I'm not advocating that, just asking)

Too funny that you guys are getting all spun up about my umbrage; too much coffee this AM? I thought I was the hypersensitive one. I just went to Mass at the most beautiful treasure of Buffalo, St. Louis Church. The most gorgeous church outside the duomi in Italy I attended. Sorry all, you'll have to indulge me; today's my last day in Bflo and I will be with friends and family. I will be off the grid here but will respond to all your challenges/questions in due time. Peace out ....

To you & K-9; you take me for a fool if you think all I watch are the most strident hacks on FNC or elsewhere. Alex Jones is a conspiratorial wing nut. I take umbrage !! There's this thing called the World Wide Web, where an objective person can find content from a multitude of sources. You should check it out sometime.

Nope I have plenty of other online sources. I see you're flinging the typical FNC canard; do you have a similar disparaging name for MSNBC? I didn't think so....

Overreaction? To those of us who are "others" on this Board, your different way of expressing can come off as rah-rah cheerleading.

he said HRC was untrustworthy & unfit to be President, and was willing to consider Trump; that was it I am far less pro-Trump than anti-HRC; I'll leave it at that and she also has a track record of destroying those women who have been involved with Slick Willie; yep, she's the pro-woman choice

fully agree; there has to be a safety net for the poor. There just has to be a better way up and out ....

That's pretty funny; I'll cede to you & get right on that....not that was a man on the street asked to describe her; perception's a beotch

I just heard something pretty damn funny about HRC: "we call her a Hood Robin; she steals from the poor and gives to herself...."

I'm sorry, per the bolded I do not recall ever saying such a thing; can you cite where I might have ? Considering we don't yet know the extent of how badly we may have been hacked by the Chinese or other nefarious regimes, and we may not know until it's too late, I'd say it's equal or more important than anything Trump may be doing with the Russians. Intellectual/information espionage is pretty bad schitt.