SDS
-
Posts
10,698 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by SDS
-
-
-
11 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:
LOL I thought it was 7pm. Game only has 11 minutes to go.
Do you even follow the Sabres?
-
3
-
-
43 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:
My gift to everyone:
-
2
-
-
Just now, GASabresIUFAN said:
Maybe the new rule would create more urgency to score quickly?
I would be surprised if some sense of urgency mattered.
-
1 minute ago, GASabresIUFAN said:
I have long believed that a missed penalty shot should still result in at least a 1 minute PP.
I don't understand why a SH goal would end a PP. I do like the idea that certain dangerous infractions, like boarding, could result in a two-minute PP regardless of how many goals are scored. Otherwise, I'm not sure I'd change the regular PP rules. I agree with the delayed penalty idea.
I’m guessing you could probably easily extract what the difference would be by looking at the number of goals scored in the first two minutes during five minute power plays. My guess is that it’s not many more than one.
-
2 minutes ago, RochesterExpat said:
I am still sitting at my desk waiting for someone who clearly isn't going to deliver to send me code that clearly isn't written so that I can integrate it.
Tomorrow is looking to be more of the same. Maybe I can see if I can find something else to top it tomorrow. Maybe I'll read War and Peace and write a book report or something.
War and peace: the missing chapters.
-
4
-
-
13 minutes ago, RochesterExpat said:
I read the full complaint--all 53 pages 🤮--and it's worth the read if you care about this. This is what happens when you spend 6 hours at your desk waiting for data science to deliver code to you. Still waiting...
Full disclosure on my personal bias so you have context for my commentary: First, I don't watch football anymore and I was never really a fan of the Bills (lets just say I'm happy that the Rooney family is called out in the complaint in a positive light for bringing change). Next, I believe at least some of the league owners are probably on some level, whether they realize it or not, racially biased. Hate to say the obvious, but it's a bunch of old white dudes AND WOMEN (my bad, fixed in edit) from a different generation and the socially acceptable standards for speech and behavior change with time (thankfully).
After reading the full complaint (granted, it's one side of the argument): I believe Mr. Trotter was not offered a new contract due to the questions he was asking the commissioner and league owners and his, frankly, antagonistic and seemingly hostile attitude toward his employer. I don't think he comes across as a "team player" or anyone I would ever like to work with. I don't believe he was racially discriminated against and I don't believe that was a consideration on his contract renewal.
Disclaimer: These are my opinions. This is not legal advice. If either the NFL or Mr. Trotter are seeking legal advice from the SabreSpace forum, they've already lost.
Things unrelated to the topic of this forum:1. He's demanding a jury trial. That's interesting. Too lazy to search demographics for the original jurisdiction, but I'm guessing that's the play there.
2. His own account of events honestly makes him appear antagonistic toward his employer- obviously this is subjective, but that's my personal interpretation. I also understand it's probably meant to read that way to portray him--rightfully or not--as a champion of civil rights. Just a peanut gallery comment.
3. He argues: 8 of 32 teams have black general managers, 3 of 32 teams have black head coaches, 1 in 6 EVP and above are black.- That's 25%, 9.4% and 16.7% black representation. Compared to overall US population of 13.6% black. Kind of makes the point moot from a stats perspective.
- "60-70% of the players are Black. Clearly the NFL's lack of diverse leadership led to a league and organization where Black people are not being given equal opportunities to obtain and/or advance to positions with meaningful authority" is a pretty terrible statement. It implies wide receivers are promoted to general managers, coaches or EVPs and ignores the entirely different skill sets.
- Honestly it's only really relevant if the 60-70% number is a reflection of general interest in football, wherein 60-70% of NFL fans are black, which is untrue.
4. He argues: "in the NFL Media newsroom, there are no black managers, no Black copy editors, and no Black full-time employees on the news desk."
- really NFL?
- I guess it depends on the overall number of jobs. If it's one manager, one copy editor and four employees on the news desk, it's hard to argue underrepresentation. In a vacuum this fact is pretty disturbing. I also don't know what the black representation is in the news media as a whole, but I suspect it's underrepresented in the industry anyway.
- This is probably the strongest point in this section.
5. Unsubstantiated accusation against the league that weakens his point:
"The NFL has consistently acquiesced to and participated in outright discrimination and continues to refuse to take remedial action to solve this obvious problem."- If this is true (and it's "consistent" and "obvious") he should have been able to point to specific examples in this part of the complaint as he does above. He doesn't. The lawyer dropped the ball here. I realize it's meant to be attention grabbing, but statements like this can prejudice a judge.
6. Claims and Relief section:
- He is asking for remedies available under law (normal)
- He seeks "equitable relief to force the NFL to remedy and change its discriminatory and retaliatory practices and comply with the law" which would be implemented via a "court-ordered monitor to review the NFL's policies and/or practices and implement necessary changes with respect to hiring, retention and advancement of Black people throughout all levels of the NFL organization and hierarchy." He also wants a "full-scale investigation" in to the "discriminatory and/or retaliatory animus of all persons in positions of power within the NFL, including NFL team owners"
- Yeah, the first is a reasonable ask. The latter... not happening.
7. Admin/Jurisdiction/Parties sections
- Same ***** different complaint
8. Points/Comments from factual allegations:
-
The league was biased against black players in the 1930s and specifically says George Preston Marshall may have been personally biased.
- this kind of broadly generalizes and era where this was unfortunatel normal (***** League) and Mr. Marshall died in 1969 so... -
Makes arguments that it took too long for the first black head coach, manager, etc.
- valid points, but this is still 20+ years ago - Argues that because it's the same owners who were biased then which, apart from Virginia McCaskey, is arguably untrue. The children of the owners aren't the same as the original owners themselves.
- Keeps saying the league profited off of Black people which is certainly an attempt to allude to slavery. Kind of a risky play depending on the judge
-
Brings up the Colin Kaepernick situation and references former President Trump
- The league never admitted racial bias over this. Mr. Trotter's own statements point to the fact Colin Kaepernick was sidelined for political speech which the courts have long held is not protected speech in the context of employment. It's also a public fact that Kaepernick's actions cost the league financially, so it's not a surprise he was blackballed. It's still a business. You don't intentionally hurt your business. -
Jon Gruden emails
- Points to John Gruden's now public emails as evidence of pervasive racism, sexism, etc.
- Ignores the fact Gruden was fired (should mention he was brought back for a workout)
- Ignores that the emails were only between two people and it's entirely within the realm of possibility that no one else knew their privately held opinions -
"Race-Norming in the NFL's Concussion Settlement" -- Put another way, the NFL not only insisted that white people simply have better cognitive function than Black people, but the league also did this in a context that would lead to reduced recovery for Black players relative to white players. The NFL’s assumption that someone is not as cognitively advanced as another person because of the color of his skin is the very definition of racism and is abhorrent.
- Not touching this with a 10 foot pole except to say "there's more to it." Here is an article from WaPo if you're interested.
- This is the strongest argument (in my opinion) of the league's bias, but the settlement agreement which allowed it was agreed to by the players so...
- Also the NFL did cease doing this so they responded to it. For whatever that's worth. -
Alleges the NFL pandered to minorities following "widespread societal racial protests"
- Quotes Goodell, "we were wrong" and later covers Goodell's past comments about Kaepernick. I guess people can't admit they were wrong?
- His whole point kind of goes against the rest of his complaint, frankly, since it implies when the NFL takes the action he wants, it's just pandering.
- This is really weak across the board -
Alleges the NFL attempted to pander to minorities after the Brian Flores' lawsuit
- Points out the NFL responded to the suit by stating it was without merit. That's standard practice.
- Complains that the cases were sent to arbitration by a judge and suggests it's further evidence against the league. Also pretty standard practice.
- Should add the lawsuit isn't even settled/heard yet.
- Actually provides examples of the NFL taking action to change (mentions the Coach and Front Office Accelerator Program). Works against him again. -
NFL Owners Have Engaged in Numerous Instance of Bigotry
- Mentions a 1957 photograph with Jerry Jones "a youth at the time" protesting desegregation and criticizes Jones' response once it became public
- Mentions the owner of the Jets was subjected to an investigation by the State Department over reports he made Black staff members uncomfortable when he was a US ambassador. It's worth noting this is true and the State Department investigated, but ultimately concluded the allegations were "unsubstantiated" -
As another example, in 2017, at an NFL owner’s meeting, Bob McNair, then-owner of the Houston Texans, stated of Mr. Kaepernick and others’ racial injustice protests, “We can’t have the inmates running the prison.” Of course, referring to players, the majority of which are Black, as “inmates” has obvious racial meaning. Mr. McNair apologized, but later retracted his apology stating, “I didn’t really have anything to apologize for.”
- Yikes. First that we are automatically associating black people with criminals. Second because the owners think they have that much control. Reality is, in context, McNair meant something akin to "you don't have students running the school." I'm available for PR contracting if Mr. McNair is interested. -
NFL Has Barriers of Entry for Black Leaders
- Once again mentions zero black owners. For this to be relevant whatsoever, someone needs to prove a minority owner tried to buy a team and was denied for racial reasons. Is it unfortunate the league is white? Yes. Is it more likely a due to wealth distribution and not racial discrimination in the NFL? Also, yes.
- Once again doesn't understand how stats work
- Once again implies playing wide receiver has the same skill set as a GM and there's some kind of promotion track from one to the other
- Criticizes the "Rooney Rule" for leading to sham interviews which is fair, but ignores the reason the rule was adopted because it helps the NFL's case
- Mentions the Flores suit again even though that hasn't been settled or gone to court yet so it's not a big strength per se -
Jim Trotter's Impecable (sic) Resume as a Journalist
- It's his CV and, like most CVs, has a spelling mistake.
- Unsurprisingly, he has a genuinely impressive CV.
9. Section on his time at the NFL:
-
The NFL Team Owners, the NFL and NFL Media are a Single Enterprise
- this part breaks down the relationship between the different entities -
Mr. Trotter's Employment at the NFL
- Mr. Trotter also asked Mr. Sperry, the head of the news desk, to confirm his understanding that there was not a single full-time Black employee working on the news desk. Mr. Sperry confirmed in writing that Mr. Trotter’s understanding was correct, though also expressed concern regarding Mr. Trotter’s inquiry and implored Mr. Trotter not to speak publicly regarding this lack of diversity.
- Thankfully, Mr. Marvel—Mr. Trotter’s manager when he started at the NFL—was a champion of Mr. Trotter and his unwillingness to accept the status quo. However, Mr. Marvel also let Mr. Trotter know that not everyone in the NFL was as accepting of diverse opinions that were critical of the NFL’s record on race discrimination. Mr. Marvel reminded Mr. Trotter that the newsroom and NFL Media reported to the NFL league office. It was clear to Mr. Trotter that he had to tread carefully whether speaking about these matters informally or reporting on these matters externally in connection with his journalistic work because the NFL and the team owners were ultimately his employer. But Mr. Trotter is highly principled and was undeterred.
[several examples of him doing what his boss told him not to do]
- Unfortunately, in or around June 2021, Mr. Marvel was let go and replaced by Ali Bhanpuri. Mr. Bhanpuri did not share Mr. Marvel’s support for Mr. Trotter or Mr. Totter’s critical view on the NFL’s problems with racism. Mr. Bhanpuri deterred Mr. Trotter from speaking up about these matters within the workplace or engaging in critical reporting about racial injustice within the NFL.
- So he was told not to do something and he did it anyway. This is getting a bit more suspect on why he was fired. Now looking like insubordination.
10. Jerry Jones:
I don't know how to summarize this other than to say to go read it. In short, Mr. Trotter got upset that he wasn't allowed to report on a comment made by Jerry Jones directly to him until after his manager and others addressed it. Once again, Mr. Trotter does not come across in anyway as a coworker I would like to work with and certainly not as someone I would like as a subordinate. That's neither here nor there.
The actual comment made by Jerry Jones was "If blacks feel some kind of way, they should buy their own team and hire who they want to hire." which was made in response to Mr. Trotter asking him why there are "so few black decision makers."
In response to Mr. Trotter, Mr. Jones dodged the question and stated that players get a large percentage of league revenue and the majority of players are Black. In effect, Mr. Jones was stating that Black people should “be happy for what they have” and not seek further advancement of their rights, positions in society or equality. Mr. Trotter reiterated his question, and Mr. Jones responded, “I’m starting to feel a little defensive.” However, notwithstanding Mr. Jones’ previous answer or history of conduct, Mr. Trotter made it clear that he was not attacking him, or even speaking about the Cowboys, but just asking about the league generally. Mr. Jones finally responded: “If Blacks feel some kind of way, they should buy their own team and hire who they want to hire.” Mr. Trotter responded by asking if the NFL was going to change its rules requiring purchasers to buy at least 30% of the team and finance deals with no more than $1 billion in debt. Mr. Jones ignored the question. Towards the end of the conversation, Pittsburgh Steelers owner Art Rooney II arrived. At that point, Mr. Jones said in sum and substance that he and Mr. Trotter should “agree to disagree” about the NFL’s issues with race. It was an awkward moment for Mr. Rooney who had joined a rather contentious conversation without knowing the topic being discussed. The following morning, Mr. Trotter apologized to Mr. Rooney for being brought into that situation.
I'd love to see a real transcript of this conversation. The comment made is pretty bad. I suspect, based on how the rest of this complaint reads, Jerry Jones just wanted to get away from Mr. Trotter and found him pretty annoying. Not that it excuses his comment, but it does explain why Mr. Trotter may not have been offered a new contract.
11. Pegula (see below)
12. Once again brings up the Flores suit. Now he includes a quote wherein he's asking Goodell directly about underrepresentation during the "state of the league" press conference. Mr. Trotter alleges that, because he said "where I work" and "as a member of the media group" he was not asking his question (again, this is literally at a press conference) "in his capacity as a journalist. He was asking as an employee of the NFL" and was "engaged in protected activity address to Mr. Goodell directly." That's a leap.
13. Lack of sincerity with the accelerator program (kind of builds off of his earlier allegations about pandering):Mr. Trotter felt that the Accelerator Program was another example of a public relations stunt with little chance of making any meaningful difference. Accordingly, Mr. Trotter drafted a column in which he was critical of the NFL’s efforts to achieve diversity in the coaching ranks and counted the Accelerator Program as yet program which was ill-conceived even if it had an appearance of being well-intentioned.
Mr. Bhanpuri gave Mr. Trotter substantial pushback regarding his critique of the NFL. Mr. Bhanpuri told Mr. Trotter that the article had to be more “balanced,” i.e. more favorable to the NFL. Mr. Trotter was also told that his article was “dismissive” towards the NFL and was told that “this week’s event was positive” and that sentiment had to be reflected in the article.
Mr. Trotter said he was being forced to write the article in a manner that NFL leadership wanted and not in a manner that reflected his genuine beliefs and opinions. In one particular email, Mr. Trotter said, “The only reason we’re doing it this way is because there is no way I’d be allowed to write what I really feel about it—which, ironically, is supposed to be the point of a column.”This doesn't prove racism. The NFL has a self-interest here and it's Mr. Trotter's an employee of the organization. Also, frankly, Mr. Trotter just appears biased. It continues that he wouldn't let it rest and he had a zoom call with management which "appeared to be some level of unanimity that the article would run" but it never did. So I can understand why he'd be upset from a professional aspect, but he's also an employee of the NFL.
14. More complaints about lack of diversity in the news room and lack of action.
15. Told to stand down regarding the NFL's handling of the Damar Hamlin Incident- basically, the league didn't want the fact it intended to resume the game (initially) getting out. Mr. Trotter wanted to report on it. Got told no.
- Mr. Trotter, being a tenacious reporter, pushed further that he needed to speak to the individual or at the very least needed a comment from that person. Mr. McCarthy responded, knowing that Mr. Trotter was not “merely” a journalist but also an NFL employee, “I will call your supervisor if you don’t let this go.” Mr. Trotter responded that he was “fine with” Mr. McCarthy calling his supervisor because he was doing his job. Soon after, Mr. Trotter received a text message from Mr. Sperry. Mr. Sperry directed Mr. Trotter to “stand down” in his reporting on the story. Mr. Trotter responded, “I thought it was our job as journalists to always pursue the truth. Is that not the case?” Mr. Sperry never responded to Mr. Trotter’s text message—which speaks for itself.
- Employee of the NFL is told what he can and can't do in the capacity of his job working for the NFL. News at 11.
16. Other examples of Mr. Trotter's attempts to raise awareness about lack of diversity but nothing really worth repeating.
17. This is the part where he covers the actual contract renewal (or lack thereof).- He basically admits to harassing Goodell. It's a pretty bad look.
-
Mr. Goodell responded, “As an employee, you should have my email and phone number.” Mr. Trotter explained that he had reached out to Mr. Goodell’s team and tried several times to have Mr. Goodell on his (now former) podcast without success.
- Oh boy. You wanted him on your podcast? This is drifting further and further from racial bias. - It goes into detail on a conversation between Ms. Nunez and Mr. Trotter about whether or not he was willing to get "in alignment" at which point it's like a full page soap box by Mr. Trotter about standing up for views and speaking out. He then asks if he's getting a renewed contract and was told "I don't know, it's getting discussed."
- After that conversation, he stopped getting assigned writing pieces.
- He was then told his contract wasn't getting renewed.
- Therefore, retaliation (probably true in a very broad sense of the term?)
- Once again, he's supposed to be arguing he was discriminated against based on his race. You have to connect the dots, I guess.
18. I'm not breaking down the causes of action but he's listing a bunch of statutes that prohibit race-based discrimination.
For the parts that are actually relevant to Bills/Sabres fans:
Complaint:
Mr. Pegula stated his opinion that Mr. Kaepernick's disenfranchisement was a "media problem" and proposed that the NFL needed a spokesperson to promote the league's image. Mr. Pegula suggested that the spokesperson be Black in order to placate the media: "For us to have a face, as an African-American, at least a face that could be in the media, we could fall in behind that." This statement exemplifies the NFL's focus on "appearing" inclusive when it is advantageous from a business or public relations angle, while not actually embracing the concept of diversity in any meaningful manner.
The statement references this article for the sources of the quotes: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/25/sports/nfl-owners-kaepernick.htmlFrom the article:
The owners were intent on finding a way to avoid Trump’s continued criticism. The president’s persistent jabs on Twitter had turned many fans against the league. Lurie, who called Trump’s presidency “disastrous,” cautioned against players getting drawn into the president’s tactics.
“We’ve got to be careful not to be baited by Trump or whomever else,” Lurie said. “We have to find a way to not be divided and not get baited.”
The Buffalo Bills owner Terry Pegula sounded anguished over the uncertainty of when Trump would take another shot at the league. “All Donald needs to do is to start to do this again,” Pegula said. “We need some kind of immediate plan because of what’s going on in society. All of us now, we need to put a Band-Aid on what’s going on in the country.”
The Jacksonville Jaguars owner Shahid Khan countered that the worst was behind them. “All the damage Trump’s going to do is done,” he said.
The owners kept returning to one bottom-line issue: Large numbers of fans and sponsors had become angry about the protests. Boycotts had been threatened and jerseys burned and — most worrisome — TV ratings were declining.
Pegula complained that the league was "under assault." He unloaded a dizzying flurry of nautical metaphors to describe their predicament. "To me, this is like a glacier moving into the ocean," he said. "We're getting hit with a tsunami." He expressed his wish that the league never be a "glacier crawling into the ocean."
The Houston Texans owner Bob McNair was more direct. He urged the players to tell their colleagues to, essentially, knock off the kneeling. "You fellas need to ask your compadres, fellas, stop that other business, let's go out and do something that really produces positive results, and we'll help you."
After the Miami Dolphins owner Stephen Ross raised the idea of a "march on Washington" by N.F.L. players and owners, Eric Reid, Kaepernick's former teammate and the first player to kneel alongside him, brought the discussion back to Kaepernick.[...]
Pegula offered that he thought the league was battling a perception and “media problem.” He said it would be great for the league to find a compelling spokesman — preferably a player — to promote all of the good things they were doing together. He suggested that the league could learn from the gun lobby in this regard.
“For years we’ve watched the National Rifle Association use Charlton Heston as a figurehead,” Pegula said. “We need a spokesman.”
Anquan Boldin, a former N.F.L. wide receiver who was at the meeting, said that owners needed to be spokesmen, too. “Letting people know it’s not just the players that care about these issues, but the owners, too,” Boldin said.
Pegula didn’t address Boldin’s point except to add that it would be important for the spokesman to be black. (None of the owners in the N.F.L. are black.)
“For us to have a face, as an African-American, at least a face that could be in the media,” Pegula continued, “we could fall in behind that.”
Commentary:
- He's using this to reiterate his point about pandering, but this came from a league-wide meeting in which players were free to speak up and apparently none objected to this (again, 60-70% are black). So it somewhat weakens that point.
- Didn't realize a league owner proposed a march on Washington. Neat.
- In context, Pegula's comments make a more sense now. Doesn't really prove anything relevant to Mr. Trotter's suit except to confirm that the owners are white and they recognized they needed a more representative spokesman.
- If anything, after reading the article, it makes me think the league actually tried to do meaningful change regarding racial issues which I didn't believe prior
Complaint:
The NFL Takes No Action in Response to Racist Conduct by Buffalo Bills
Team Owner Terry Pegula; Complaints “Swept Under the Rug.”On September 3, 2020, a large NFL Media zoom meeting was held which included approximately 40 newsroom employees. The purpose of the meeting, during the
middle of the pandemic, was to connect people who were not working together in-person and discuss various stories people were working on.
During the meeting, an NFL Media reporter described a conversation he had with Buffalo Bills owner Terry Pegula in which Mr. Pegula was speaking about the recent emphasis on social activism by NFL players, and in particular support for Black Lives Matter.
As reported, Mr. Pegula stated that, “If the Black players don’t like it here, they should go back to Africa and see how bad it is.” This remark was so offensive and racist that the people in the meeting appeared to be frozen, unsure how to even react.Mr. Trotter would not stand by and spoke up. In front of everyone in attendance, Mr. Trotter asked Mr. Marvel and Mr. Sperry if there was going to be a discussion about what Mr. Pegula had said given that it was so highly offensive and racist. They responded that they would speak to the reporter about it further and decide how to handle the matter.
Thereafter, Mr. Trotter sought out Mr. Marvel and Mr. Jurenka on a near weekly basis about what was being done to address Mr. Pegula’s discriminatory remarks. Mr. Trotter was repeatedly brushed off and told that “the league office is investigating it.”However, this went on for months and Mr. Trotter never received any further update beyond this superficial statement. Notably, no one from the NFL’s league office ever reached out to Mr. Trotter to interview him in connection with any supposed “investigation” that was supposedly ongoing. Clearly it was not a priority to investigate an NFL team owner’s discriminatory animus and discriminatory remarks in conversations with employees.
Nearly one year after the incident, Mr. Marvel told Mr. Trotter that the league had provided him with a response. He told Mr. Trotter: “New York says it’s an HR matter and that’s the end of it.”Thus, in response to an allegation by an employee (the reporter) and complaint by another employee (Mr. Trotter) that an NFL owner (an employer) made racist remarks that ridiculed Black players (also employees) for their social activism, the NFL did absolutely nothing.
Mr. Trotter said to Mr. Marvel, “So we are sweeping this under the rug?” Mr. Marvel responded, “I can only tell you what I’ve been told.”
Commentary
It's a bit self-contradictory to state that "the NFL did absolutely nothing" when the league did issue a response that it was an HR matter. I'd argue "doing nothing" means completely ignoring the complaint. That's neither here nor there.
So this is a reporter repeating a conversation he had with Terry Pegula in which Terry Pegula allegedly made an unacceptable comment. This should be pretty easy to follow up on in the discovery phase. Did the NFL investigate? There would presumably be a record of it. If there was no investigation, why? Where did it die? Or, you know, just depose the reporter.
Based on the text above, the league investigated. This complaint is trying to paint this as a sham investigation, at least in part due to the NFL's league office not interviewing Mr. Trotter. Additionally, the league responded to Mr. Marvel--apparently unsolicited because if it was done only after Mr. Trotter pressed, that would have been mentioned--and said it was an HR matter.I suspect the actual chain of events--and what will be revealed during discovery--is the following:
- Reporter repeats conversation he had with Terry Pegula
- Mr. Trotter takes offense and lodges a complaint with his management
- Management clearly notified the NFL
- The NFL investigated. They talked to the reporter.
- the reporter refused to go on record to confirm or deny the conversation... why? Possibly over fear of retaliation which is a serious issue if true
- The NFL concludes hearsay isn't enough evidence and without the source confirming, nothing more is done.
- End of investigation
Unlike a lot of the allegations in this complaint, it's not directly contradicted by other portions of the complaint and there aren't other news sources which covered it. If the reporter made the comment in a zoom meeting which resulted in "people in the meeting [appearing] to be frozen" and there were 40 people in the meeting, I'm somewhat shocked this wasn't out earlier.
Assuming that the reported really did say what he allegedly said in this zoom meeting (should be easy to verify considering 40 witnesses), I suspect there's some truth in it and that's a bad look for Terry Pegula.This has to be the longest post ever here and probably at twobillsdrive also. Lol. I tapped out somewhere around number 13. 🤷
-
3
-
1
-
49 minutes ago, steveoath said:
Ventura guests on the EBW podcast. Interesting if you’re into analytics. Talks about building up sabres analytics side as well as a lot of data and process stuff.
also interesting is the chat about the Champions Hockey League (euro top teams from diff countries play each other). They are trying out 3 new rules:
Scoring on PP does not end PP.
Short handed goal ends PP.
Goal on delayed penalty does not cancel the ensuing PP.
1. That sounds fine. I’m guessing the number of power-play goals that would be scored onto minute penalties would increase by no more than 10 to 15%.
2. Again, that sounds fine. That’s almost inconsequential.
3. Another one that increases hope, but probably has a little outcome on goals overall.
-
1 hour ago, darksabre said:
You know, it would save everyone a lot of back and forth if they would bother to read the suit.
Trotter is not making any accusations against Pegula. He is accusing the league of being full of ***** about its investigation of the alleged incident, and of terminating him for pressing them on it. It is provided as one example, of many, of the league machine existing to cover up, rather than actively pursue remediation of, racist behavior.
Believe the stories in the suit or don't, it doesn't really matter. What is being asked is: did the league actually do any due diligence? If not, why? And was the plaintiff wrongfully terminated for trying to hold his employer accountable?
If the Pegula allegations were properly investigated by the league, they should have no trouble providing their documentation of it as part of this suit, and Pegula can brush the whole thing off. Maybe his press release should have said something to that effect.
Unless it couldn't.
Great to see you again. I hope all is well.
-
3 minutes ago, nfreeman said:
Well, the statement was allegedly made sometime in 2018 and the complaint with the NFL was filed, and the investigation made, after the September 2020 zoom call. Also, it looks like Trotter is the one who complained to the NFL about this -- not the unnamed person who allegedly heard TP say this.
So when the unnamed person told the story on the zoom call, anywhere from 1.75 to 2.75 years had elapsed since the dinner. A lot can happen to memories, and stories, and agendas, in that length of time. And certainly an exaggerated or misremembered story can be repeated and further spun or distorted by someone who hears it and is PO'd by it.
Speaking only for myself, I'd like to know whether TP said this.
Thanks for clearing up the timeline. 👍
-
Again, correct me if I’m wrong, but as far as I’m concerned, as a Buffalo fan, the lawsuit is irrelevant to me. A complaint was filed and an investigation occurred. I think that’s the salient point in all of this.
-
6 minutes ago, ... said:
How many ways can this dichotomy be cast?
A persona of whom it is socially safe to hold prejudices against vs someone desperate to regain a job in an industry that poorly handles charged social issues?
If it was already investigated and determined to be a non-starter before the suit was filed why use it as an argument in the suit?
Correct me if I’m wrong, didn’t the complaint/investigation come way before this lawsuit? I haven’t read anything to suggest there was an immediate benefit to the person finally the complaint at the time of filing.
So, if it was true there was no immediate benefit to the person filing the complaint at the time of the complaint, is the assertion that a random complaint was filed by a sociopath who was particularly bored that day?
-
1 hour ago, nfreeman said:
From The Buffalo News today:
So while this probably puts an end to the story, just to be clear that reporting just states that no one else heard it. Most get togethers have sidebar conversations and this could have just been a one on one that no one else heard.
I think the more important aspect here is that doesn’t appear to be a random footnote in a lawsuit. It looks like a complaint was actually filed at the time and some level of investigation occurred. That’s an oddly specific phrase and it went far enough for an investigation to take place.
Old billionaire white dude who lives in Florida makes a racist statement vs someone making up said statement and filing a private report to the league.
What do you think the betting lines are here?
-
3
-
-
23 minutes ago, Taro T said:
Hope the rest of your B-day gifts weren't as lame as the one the Bills gave you, oh Fearless Leader.
New golf balls, and a new wallet/apple air tag setup so O can find my wallet. I lose lose it every two years and misplace it twice a week.
-
1
-
-
Thanks everyone! Bummer about the Bills game today. Fingers crossed the Sabres open on a better foot.
-
-
19 minutes ago, Wyldnwoody44 said:
Drafting and driving.
Good luck this season boys!
Looks like it worked out
-
12 minutes ago, Wyldnwoody44 said:
Thanks, I'm going to try my best to make it live, as it's way more fun that way. Is it 930 now? My email said 630
It has always been 930. You may have your time zone incorrect in your profile.
-
[This is an automated response]
This topic is no longer contributing positively to the community and therefore the discussion has been closed.
Thank you.
-
1
-
7
-
-
3 hours ago, Wyldnwoody44 said:
Draft is at 630, there's a good chance that I won't be able to get online or have anyone Draft for me, is there a way to set up auto draft? It doesn't appear so on my android to be a way.
You probably need to do this from a PC:
How do I set up auto draft in fantasy football?
1. Steps to Enable Auto Draft
- Log in to your chosen platform's Fantasy Football account.
- Go to the “League” tab and select the specific league you want to participate in.
- Click on the “Draft” tab and navigate to the “Draft Settings” section.
- Look for the “Autopick Draft” option and enable it.
-
On 8/21/2023 at 5:23 PM, SDS said:
Draft order (1-time Yahoo random selection):
1. CircleTheWagons
2. Clown Shoes
3. North Buffalo
4. Derrico
5. Woody's Foot...
6. Scott's Tots
7. pi2000
8. NorCal
9. Five Hole
10. Waratahs
11. GraveDiggsaz
12. Labatt Blue
-
26 minutes ago, Wyldnwoody44 said:
Draft is at 630, there's a good chance that I won't be able to get online or have anyone Draft for me, is there a way to set up auto draft? It doesn't appear so on my android to be a way.
Yes there is. If you’re having trouble I will see if I can have that set for your team. I am pretty sure it’s the default, but it would suck waiting the full minute every time. Lol
-
Looks like we have a conflict. Is 9:30 pm on Wednesday too late? That gives me chance to be done elsewhere it close to it.
@Wyldnwoody44 maybe you could be on the phone with someone in the car and have try and draft with a few choices given to you?
-
3
-
-
On 8/23/2023 at 9:02 AM, pastajoe said:
I’d play if you need an alternate.
All right Joe you’re in. I have not heard from Andrew in forever nor has he logged in so it’s not really fair to keep you hanging here.
-
1
-
Show us the 11th pic in your camera roll
in The Aud Club
Posted
“Cat”.