wildcat48 Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 The Sabres have placed Mark Parrish on waivers. He was released by the Sabres so the fact he's on waivers would indicate that he's been signed. Still looking into details..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 The Sabres have placed Mark Parrish on waivers. He was released by the Sabres so the fact he's on waivers would indicate that he's been signed. Still looking into details..... I'd imagine you answered your own question there. Signing him makes perfect sense as I would imagine Porland would love to have a legit veteran presence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat48 Posted October 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Dineen confirmed last night and today that he was signed to a two-way contract, cleared waivers and been assigned to Portland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myers57 Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Dineen confirmed last night and today that he was signed to a two-way contract, cleared waivers and been assigned to Portland. do u my good friend have a link..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korab rules Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Does that mean we can't waive him and sign Kennedy for his spot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Does that mean we can't waive him and sign Kennedy for his spot? They already waived him, which was necessary to assign him to Portland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korab rules Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 They already waived him, which was necessary to assign him to Portland. Your sarcasm meter is broken. Have you been following the tim Kennedy thread today? Mark Parrish. He's on the Sabres present roster on sabres.com. McCormick? Don't acquire Niedermayer? Name a slacker, any slacker? Again, I have a hard time believing based on the way last season played out that Kennedy had not earned a spot on this roster. And anyone who's backpeddling now by saying there's no way he could crack THIS lineup is beyond disingenuous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Your sarcasm meter is broken. Have you been following the tim Kennedy thread today? I'm still lost on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spndnchz Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 Hoppe confirms Enroth and gragnani to portland and parrish signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korab rules Posted October 6, 2010 Report Share Posted October 6, 2010 I'm still lost on that one. Forget it. Pa was disingenuously suggesting we waive Parrish since he was officially still on the roster according to the sabres out of date website and claim TK off waivers for his "spot". Any joke that takes this much splainin never should have been made in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.