Jump to content

HoosierDaddy

Members
  • Posts

    140
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HoosierDaddy

  1. I’m starting to regret bringing up Housley as a player amongst fellow fans. There really is a huge gulf between “one of the best players ever to pull on the Sabres sweater” and “hit em with your purse Phyllis.” But I think that we can all agree that he sucked as a coach.
  2. And we also hate any D that don’t hit. Housley’s in the HOF, but he was HATED as a player here.
  3. I would think that paying a player that is not on your roster would be an ownership-level decision.
  4. I’m not looking to argue here. I think we agree. On the front page of this website, there is an article that states that Ullmark’s ask from the Sabres was 6x6. If that’s true, and the other info that the hang up was term, then KA offered him 2x6. That’s reasonable. 6x6 would be a huge overpay that would become an unmovable contract in 2 years.
  5. Then we agree. He got 4x5 from Boston. If he came to the sabres and said “gimme 6x5 and I’ll stay,” KA has to say no. In a league with guaranteed contracts and a hard cap, the contracts are as important as the players. We already have the Skinner and Okposo untradable contracts hanging around our necks like lead weights. We cannot afford to add another bad contract to our books when, if this all works out, we’ll have a lot of young players to pay in a few years. We all know this, but we just can’t stand the losing anymore. I know I can’t. But I’m lucky in that I can just tune it all out because the NHL might as well not exist here in Cincinnati.
  6. I actually think that it was a good move. It’s not like we’re talking about Vasilevsky here. Ullmark is an average NHL goalie with an injury history. He probably wanted 6x5.5. That’s an overpay and a contract that’s hard to move. We’ll have to overpay players to play here when we are trying to win again, but not now. Their plan has to be UPL winning the job out of camp and Anderson mentoring him.
  7. I got this theory that a team like Minnesota is reluctant to give up major assets for Jack because they fear that he'll pull this same thing in a few months, but this time with a full NMC so he can force his way to Boston.
  8. I think that the whole reason that KA had that press conference was to make that statement about Jack being under contract.
  9. Or at least we thought we did...
  10. Risto played 78 games in 14/15, as well as Grigorenko and Zadorov.
  11. I think that I would have given him the contract that Boston did, but I think that Buffalo would have had to extended it for more than four years or paid more money. That I would not have done.
  12. And if a team hires an experienced guy, fans bash the hire as a "retread."
×
×
  • Create New...