mjd1001

The issue I have is, I think he has been doing that all along. I think a Primary reason Murray is gone is the didn't like it and said something...and Botts, I think it has been written he didn't like how we was being 'managed' from above either. I think Adams is here becuase he would do what Pegula wants him to do. If Pegula fires Adams, he is simply firing his own mouthpiece.

I know I'm saying the same thing over and over every couple of days, but I actually would like to see but I actually would like to see "Adams unleashed" before I see him fired. The problem is we should have seen that last year or the year before. I really think Adams does the leg work but every move is approved by Pegula, and Terry even suggests some moves. My impression is that Adams is like a chef and waiter at a restaurant... He talks to other teams, does the work and puts together a "menu" of options for moves that can be made.... but it's really Pegula that is making the final choices. There is some evidence to this years ago and some circumstantial evidence recently. Beyond that there's no smoking shotgun but I just get the impression that's how things are run there.

As per my post above, what is up with Columbus? It is now more than just one or two games, they are consistently looking really really good.

Of the line combos listed above, who gets benched for Benson? Quinn? And is that a long-term thing?

Ok.... This isn't exactly the same but it came across that way to me or reminded me of something else I don't like... Commercials where they have really, really old people acting like young people, like people in their 70s and 80s out surfing or hang gliding or doing crazy stuff like tha....but also.... Just the same where I watch the financial news and there's a little 13-year-old kid who all of a sudden has this incredible knowledge of financial markets and is telling me what to do with my finances and investments... Or maybe even that insurance ad where the little babies are playing pickleball. I think maybe the first time somebody did something like that. It was fun... But those ads are really old and really annoying now.

From a strictly personal opinion standpoint: -Me 2 years ago: Cozens should be wing. Sabres: he's a center -Me last year: Cozens style of play suits wing, he doesn't have the mentality/style to know how to play C in the D-zone. Sabres: He's a center -Me earlier this year: He isn't scoring, his whole line is awful, demote him or move him to wing. Sabres: He's a center -Me 4 days ago: He's getting chances I guess, he is streaky, keep him at Center, give him time. Sabres: Lets try him at wing!

Firing Adams has to come with Pegula saying he is going to 'keep distance' from the franchise and let the new GM do his job...that he will just be a fan going forward. Until/unless that happens, you are going to likely get the same result with just a different name on the door.

Just noticed the Caps vs Rangers, and Capitals put the game away with an empty net goal....goal song? Kickstart my Heart by Motley Crue...same as in Buffalo.

Quinn has played 9 games this year vs 27 last year, so 1/3 the games. But look at the 2 screenshots of where he is getting his shots from. He thrived last year shooting from the center of the ice. This year, in 9 games, he has ONE shot from the center of the ice in front of the goalie, compared to 24 (not even counting the wrap arounds form behind the net, he hasn't had one attempt, or the one from near the blue line.) So, on a per-game basis, he would have 8 shots from between the circles if he was getting chances like last year though 9 games. This year....1.

I never looked at the numbers this deeply, but from watching the games, my opinion was he is the 2nd or 3rd best guy on this team. Ability in the offensive zone he seems tied for 2nd with Power. He seems to me to be pretty reliable with defensive zone exits (pass or skating out). yeah, I will admit he isn't a exactly a bear getting the puck out of corners or cleaning out the front of the net, but I've been decently satisfied with how he plays.

Cozens is taking a LOT of shots. Could it be he is so desperate to get that first goal that he's taking all the shots, not looking to get his wingers involved at all? Cozens leads the team in shots. He's taking 25% more shots per game than last year. 40% more than his career average. Its not the only thing for sure wrong with Quinns game, but if Cozens is just letting a shot off all the time without looking to get Quinn invovled, it might be something?

How good is Columbus? 9 points in 8 games, a positive 8 goal differential. Wins over Colorado, Buffalo, and the last 2 they blew out Toronto and blew out Edmonton. And they are doing it with "bleh" goaltending so far. Other thing I am watching is Kaprizov in Minnesota. He might be what I consider the most under-rated player in the game now. 15 points in 8 games so far. He had almost 50 goals and 100 points last year with missing 7 games. Since he came into the league, he is 6th in goals and 10th in points in the entire league. I think most of us on this board know he's good, but he is on the border of superstar/elite...and I don't think he gets that recognition.

Part of me would like to see a poll just to see how wildly the results swing game to game. I get the impression they results of the poll would swing more after a single win or a single loss than they would be over the longer term actual moves in the standings.

Ok, I obviously never played hockey at a higher level than recreation...but... -As fighting goes away and hits are more regulated, speed/quickness/'shiftiness' becomes slightly more important than strength used to be -Speaking from experience on the ice, a really big, strong guy won't come out ahead of a collision on the ice vs a thinner guy IF the thin guy has great balance and can 'regulate' himself on his skates better than the 'bigger guy'. -Endurance. Endurance I think is become a huge issue the last 10-15 years in hockey. Carrying around any un-needed weight hurts you and makes you a liability at the end of any shift over 45 seconds.

Up until next week, I though Cozens needed to be benched, demoted, etc. I changed my mind on that last week. He is playing his game. He is 'playing' pretty much the same as he did 2 years ago. He is just in a 'shooting slump'. I know people say 'give him new linemates' or 'he needs to be moved to wing**' or 'move him to the 4th line'. I get the frustration, but honestly he is PLAYING almost the exact same way he did 2 years ago positionally, maybe getting even more shots. He just needs to start converting. His game is no different at all EXCEPT for accuracy. And if you look at his career, he is a very, VERY streaky shooter. He goes months at a time shooting as well as Thompson, then a month or two shooting under 5%. No rhyme or reason for it...its random..and that is who he is. So, you just wait for him to emerge from this shooting slump. No new teammate, no new line, no new position will help that. We are into 5 seasons of proof that that is who he is regarding shooting. Now, LONG term, the question is.....you are going to get shooting streaks out of him, but what is he OVERALL? Is he as 12% shooter? a 9% shooter? a 7% shooter? You are always going to get streakiness out of him, but IF you determin he is a 10-12% shooter overall, he's your 2nd line center. If he is a 7-9% shooter then even with his 'streakiness', you are wasting valuable minutes giving them to Cozens. ** I personally do think his style of play is better at wing, but it appears no one in coaching/management is going to make that change.

Well, yeah most of recent history, but remember last year they were on the positive side of things ( just barely at a +2, but they WERE positive for the first time in years.)

And any assists given on 'goal scorer goals' are even worse. You are listing very specific examples. I have not mapped out every single goal scored by him or anyone else in the NHL, but to me its obvious that his goals are mostly scored when 'replacement level players' in the exact same situation would not have scored them. OVERALL, I place much higher value on the ONE goal scored than I do on the 'up to' 2 assists given.

9 game for Mitts this season, 5 goals and 7 assists (46 goal, 64 assist, 110 point per 82 pace). I don't think that pace will keep going at that rate, and in the first few games he had some pretty bad defensive zone coverage issues, but right how he's fitting in nicely. If he does keep going at even a pace close to this, this would be one example of "the guy who doesn't reach his peak at 22, but keeps getting better every year, through age, 23, 24, even 25."

If we take that back to the topic at hand... Tage.... There is a valid point to be made... I don't agree with it. Totally... That assists can be just as valuable as goals. Yes, I agree they can be but overall I think goals are more important. If it was really easy to do, what Zach Hyman... Or Tim Kerr... Or Dave Andreychuk did.... A lot more players who score 10 goals a year would be doing that and putting up 30 up to 50. But seriously now back to Thompson... I think watching him play... I think most people would agree that he doesn't get those Zach Hyman type goals. Tage is creating his own space, and his shot is one of the best in the league. Thompson might be one of the top examples of someone who gets his goals as a result of his own talent and work, not just tapping in someone else's leftovers.

I'm not saying they shouldn't be awarded. I'm saying that when I evaluate a player, goals are SO much more important than assists.

I'll raise you and say point percentage is what counts. Everyone hasn't played the same number of games. By the end of they year everyone will, and point percentage is what matters (I think there was a time a few years ago when a couple teams had games canceled that weren't made up, of there was a possibility they would not be made up, and the NHL said point percentage would determine playoffs, not total points). "Total points" is the the mechanism the standings use to consistency of display of standings. So by point percentage, They are in a 4 way tie for 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th in the division.

Well, 2 things: -first, for every goal scored, there are 2 assists given. So by math, an assist is worth half of a goal. -2nd, sure every once in a while, a goal is scored by deflecting off of someone, but the goal is the ultimate thing to do. An assist can be given if someone is the last one to touch the puck before the scorer, many, I would say MOST goals scored have a lot more skill involved by the scorer than the people who are handed out assists.

I watch these games and I have mixed feelings: -Growing up I liked the leafs as a little kid, not as much as the Sabres, but seeing them on HNIC, I grew to have some kind of attachment to them. -I lived near Boston for 5 years, and just like Toronto as a kid, having access to all the Bruins games and talk radio, I became aquainted with the players and started to like them a bit. -After moving back to Western NY, and seeing things with the Sabres, Bruins, and Toronto the last decade, I don't like either of them anymore. But when it comes down to it, I actually SLIGHLTLY favor the Bruins over the leafs. Why? the Fans. Now Bruins and Boston fans in general can be pretty bad, but being exposed to both, Leaf fans can be much more intolerable than Boston fans. Boston fans are spoiled and arroagant, but not much more than any other fanbase. However, Leaf fans? No fanbase I have ever experienced is as arrogant, thinks the Refs are against their team more, thinks they have the best players simply because they 'are Toronto" and "of course EVERYONE wants to play there". I actually have witnessed Bruins fans Legit say they weren't the best team when they lose and give the other team credit. If you get to that with leaf fans, its only after 10,000 posts or words written about how they were 'wronged'.

I watched some of the goals allowed: 1st goal allowed. This is on the forwards, mostly the wingers. basically the D are down low, and the goal is scored when the forwards miss coverage. Both Defensemen are down low, and at points both McLeod and Kulich go deep. Greenway is positioned very well in front of the net, but for most of the 3-4 seconds before the goal is scored, he is the ONLY one and he can't pick up everyone. So again, its probably mis-communication between all 3 of them, but both McLeod and Kulich looked a bit lost and left open spots. 2nd goal allowed: I can't really pin this on any one player. The team was running around a bit, but a shot was taken from near the blue line that was partially screened, UPL made the save but a rebound just happened to fall right to the Goal scorers stick. No one out of position really at all. If anything the whole thing started well before the goal was scored when the Sabres had the puck and couldn't get it out. Dahlin had the puck in the corner and didn't control it well forcing him to flip it up the boards to Cozens, and Cozens didn't quite handle it. Again, not a blatant error by either of them, but it was a turnover that led to this, 1/2 of it on Dahlin, 1/2 on Cozens. 3rd goal allowed: Dahlin tried to pass the puck to Thompson in the offensive zone but Tage was covered and fumbled it. All the other forwards were not in good position (none of the 3 on the boards, giving Dahlin no good options. Dahlin could have held it but he tried to force it to Tage. That part of it I'd put on the wingers (for not being on the boards to be available for a pass) and Dahlin for forcing a pass when he could have held it. Then Raymond just took the puck down the ice, at one point it looked like it would be a 3-on-1 but it turned only to a 2-on-1. Dahlin actually made a nice play to slide and try to take the shot away, but Raymond made a really really nice shot. I'd want UPL to save it, but it was a good shot. This one is split evenly between the wingers in the offensive zone, Dahlin for a bad choice to make the pass, and then UPL for not making a save (although a tough one). I think Peterka was playing the other point opposite Dahlin (I think) and he just wasn't in a defensive position. The point guys on the PP are responsible not for scoring so much, but for keeping the puck moving. I'd rather the Sabres actually go with 2 D-men back there because I think they gain little from putting a forward on the point, but lose what D-man would give you knowing when and how to get back. UPL could have made that one save, but despite that he played well. Good actually. The defensemen all had a pretty good game too, no major mistakes on the goals allowed. For most of the game, the team played very positionally sound.

Hopefully what we have now is the best case scenario for him. 1.) he gets rest to get healthy. 2.) he is still part of the team so he can watch the games, watch practice, and see and absorb what is different from what he did last year. 3.) the team is currently playing well while he is out so there is no need to rush him back, especially with Aube-Kubel likely to play soon.