Jump to content

Thwomp!

Members
  • Posts

    1,944
  • Joined

Posts posted by Thwomp!

  1. 1 hour ago, nfreeman said:

    Well, they said they investigated.  Presumably their investigation yielded the conclusion that he didn't do what he's accused of, which is what his attorney said.

    It's also worth noting that criminal charges haven't been brought despite this occurring 10 months ago.  It's likely the DA's office concluded that there isn't sufficient evidence to support criminal charges.

    I don't think a team has to dump a player based solely on an accusation.

    No, the DA's office has not received anything from the police who are apparently sitting on rape kit results.  They probably filed civilly so something, anything would happen.

    If it were my daughter I'd do the same thing with the police inaction they've faced.

  2. 1 minute ago, Eleven said:

    So we have to distinguish between the civil case and a potential criminal case, in the first instance.  Her civil suit is based on allegations of multiple forcible rapes and not statutory rapes.  And complaints don't establish anything--they are just allegations.

    As for the possibility of a potential criminal case based upon statutory rape, I don't know what defenses are available in California...I have NO idea. Her representations could be a defense, his age could be a defense, etc. The age of consent is 18, as you say, though.

    I don't think there is an issue of fact as to whether some form of sex was had.  But as above, I don't know whether there are obvious defenses that would militate against prosecution.

    Well you're a lawyer and I'm not 🙂

    But, in the main video the legal expert indicates that it's a very "black and white" issue in California with few, if any, defenses.  If his DNA comes back he should be charged with criminal charges.  The police haven't been and/or still aren't exactly doing a great job with this either, so that's another aspect of this.

  3. 41 minutes ago, Eleven said:

    It also differs from what the interviewer read on camera (see the interview that Liger posted).

    DNA evidence can tell you whether the parties had sex.  It won't tell you whether it was consensual.

    Consent doesn't matter if she's 17.  He's going to get charged if the rape kit has his DNA.

  4. Adams' only "big" salary moves have been to get to the cap floor.  The bottom line is he's not spending more than that.  We didn't weaponize cap space last offseason, last trade deadline, and this offseason.  We have plenty of room to take on short term salary cap dumps for assets without having any impact on the future salary cap, but it's obvious that's not desired by ownership/management.  If you're buying LTIR contracts for pennies on the dollar to hit the cap floor, you're not spending any more money than you have to.  That was my original point and that's what reality continues to be.

  5. We're not doing deals like these.  I'm sure we've had our chances.  We're (artificially) at the cap floor and that's where Terry, and thus Kevyn, want us to be.  "Blocking development" is just another term for being cheap.  There's always room for a good player or prime assets if you want to pay a few more million a year, but that's not in the cards when a franchise is trying to run as cheaply as possible.  The state of this franchise is ownership's fault, but we're going to continue to pay for those ownership mistakes, by throwing more seasons away under the guise of "development".

    • Like (+1) 1
  6. Just got Springsteen tickets for next year.  Price was surprisingly low, but I purposely was not buying the most expensive seats.

    Next up for me is a road trip to Nashville in August for the Chili Peppers and the Strokes.  Friday night concert and then touristy stuff all weekend.  Can't wait!

  7. 8 minutes ago, mjd1001 said:

    That is a lot of money for a guy who in the last few years finished Tied for 70th in the league in goals, tied for 133rd in goals, and tied for 22nd.  Even if you take into account his games missed, he still was 33rd in goals per game last year.  He doesn't bring much defensively, and his skates don't touch the ice short-handed.

    He got paid off of his draft status and his first 2 seasons in the league 5-6 years ago.

     

    I don't know.  He just turned 24, averages 30 goals a season, had a decent bounce back season, and is gonna be on a line with Gaudreau.

  8. 14 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

    Even trading for Voracek and buying Him Out this Year or next for a First isn’t a bad idea

    0CBEBF69-2167-472F-BA76-3DC98AA0B615.jpeg

    I'm reading it as you don't save much this year on the buyout?  If not, I'd keep him at least this year if not next.  He seems like one of those good, older veteran type players you want around the youngsters for a season or two.  I don't know if the Sabres would do it or not though.  I'm sure they'll have a wide selection of these types of trades if they decide to do one.

×
×
  • Create New...