Jump to content

LTS

Members
  • Posts

    8,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LTS

  1. 14 hours ago, Thorny said:

    I expect cliches, don’t get me wrong, I’d just rather not hear the worst part of the GM’s schtick, the part most insulting to my fellow fans, regurgitated.

    Granato was saying this, pre season: 

    “2 years ago, we weren't in a position to really go after wins,” Granato said. “We had to grow, we had to gain experience. And we've got it to the point now where these guys, winning should be expected on a nightly basis. Should go into games expecting to win”

    Tuch seems to just be offering an excuse. The worst excuse, at that. I don’t expect answers from Tuch. Especially not in this format. I think just avoiding that sort of active insult to our intelligence, which is honestly how I perceive it, would be what I’m after. Again, no answers necessary.

    If he sat there and said “goal was playoffs, and we weren’t good enough. Need to be better.” then, for me, that would have been a nothingburger, expected, and fine 

    hope that clarifies my stance 

    It does.  And Granato is a bit closer to the problem.  But even he can't make people expect to win.  That comes from confidence and each player has in themselves and their teammates to execute.  I know people like to talk about Herb Brooks excellent speech and its absolutely iconic, but that speech alone doesn't translate across the full game. Certainly how Brooks coached that team to believe in themselves matters probably as much as the speech itself.  But I don't want to dissect Granato here as his statements have to be different than a players.

    I think Tuch, by saying he doesn't want to offer excuses, is prefacing that while he has to acknowledge how young the team is, he doesn't want to.  I see that as a statement outward that had the team had a little more experience they could be better.  At the same time, he isn't throwing his young team under the bus.  He's building them up and keeping their confidence higher.  The team is absolutely playing with more confidence but as we saw during the Detroit game, it's easy for them to lose it.

    Perhaps I am off, but I read Tuch's statement as a way to not undermine his teammates while still throwing a little shade at how young the team is.. and how it only got younger.  Being one of the older guys on the team I have no doubt he wants to be in the playoffs, not just for the Sabres and Buffalo but very much for himself.

    And of course.. it's all media speak.. so there's only so much I put into it all.

    14 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

    You will hate this, but I have to go back to Boston again. The line there is always "we have to better" "we weren't good enough" "no excuses". 

    imo Tuch is just towing the party line. Players on this team in general buy into the propaganda the team puts out and I think they forget the kind of competitiveness that some of them had before they go here. 

    I don't hate this at all.  I'm not sure Tuch was responding specifically to the Detroit game as it sounds like he's just commenting on the overall state of things. I would 100% expect him to reflect on the Detroit game and simply say, "We weren't good enough."  A a general reflection I go to what I said above.

    Great discourse on this.  Love that we can have this kind of discussion. Thanks to both of you.

    • Like (+1) 2
  2. Last night, as the game started, I sat on my couch with the game on mute while talking to my wife who had just returned home.  I saw the Eberle goal and told her that I guess I won't stay up tonight.  I even mentioned that I might stop down to my PC and see how SS was doing.

    Then Thompson scored... and then another and another and then I knew I was going to stay up.  Sadly I could not stop down last night but on night's like this the GDTs are the best to read.

    It did not disappoint. 

    I'm not going to critique the game... they won, that's what matters to me.  For at least one night... or at least early morning, I can be happy.

  3. 3 hours ago, Thorny said:

    I don’t know who the captain should be but it sure as shite shouldn’t be this fool

    “Still.”

    We got *younger* this year, by choice. It’s a choice. It’s not a hidden loophole for having expectations. Dear lord. They may be even younger next year. No expectations if that’s the case? 

    dear LORD. Ice a winner. Stop tricking the fans into saying anything needs to be “built.”

    Just insulting the fans right to their face. Sometimes I’m ashamed to be a fan of this organization 

    What do you want him to say instead? I'm not sure what you expect, but your first critique has to do with something he does not control. He doesn't choose who is on the team.

    I'm not necessarily defending Tuch here, but I'm not sure what people expect to hear from a player. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 2
  4. 15 minutes ago, Mr. Allen said:

    It’s great that you guys are buddies with that poster or might even think he’s pretty darn cool.  But the fact of the matter is you guys are on a hockey forum talking football.  That’s enough for me to not click on this topic again.  All good.  Go Bills.  

    You clearly are missing the entire point.  Your commentary is simply not how to treat others around here, subject and posters regardless. The fact of the matter is you are being completely disrespectful of another forum member and also taking a broad swipe at "hockey posters".

    It's not all good... it's all wrong.

     

  5. There are a lot of wacked out NFL players... WR's seem to be chock full of interesting personalities.

    Perhaps Diggs likes stirring the pot as some sort of statement on the drama of social media and the general public's desire to engage in it.

    Then again.. perhaps he's just bored.

    Or... he's wacked out.

  6. 8 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:

    Definitely not preachy.

    Would you consider yourself happy with the current Sabres?  I could be misinterpreting the posts of all the people on here who consistently retread the lack of veterans, goaltending, Granato's skills as a coach, KA as a GM, Pegula as an owner, but it seems to me like those people are unhappy and come across as choosing misery with the franchise.

    If you'd like to classify it differently by all means contribute to the conversation.  If you just want to take a shot at me, then great, I can take it. If I can keep the Sabres from making miserable there's not a chance in hell you'll succeed.

     

  7. 3 hours ago, Mango said:

    They played fast last night v NYI. If they can maintain that pace anything could happen.  That is a big if though. I think part of the problem with this team has been that they can't sustain their best hockey. It is just so taxing for them. 

    The one thing I am worried about is goaltending. The stakes are just too high to start Comrie at any point right now. They should be bringing Levi up here and there through this stretch and managing his games in the AHL to prepare for it. And if by the grace of all the good hockey ju-ju the Sabres do make the playoffs I think you have to keep Levi up as the backup.

    I don't know that Levi fixes things, maybe he does.  I do think the team is playing confident and has confidence in UPL to help bring even more confidence to their play.

    I missed the last game Comrie played but I'd like to see if the Sabres alter their style when he's in net.

  8. Hey.. each of us can choose whether we want to look at what's happening now and choose misery by reminding ourselves of the misery earlier in the season and the off-season or choose to be happy that at least they are playing well.

    No right answer, but I know I don't let teams make me miserable, there's enough in life to do that.  They win, I am happy. They lose, I am ambivalent.

    That said... I'll take a dark horse playoff run to aid in offsetting the miserable things in real life.

    • Like (+1) 2
  9. 2 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    He was good at juggling lines to freshen up the roster and keep players motivated.  He also had a fiery personality behind the bench, at times literally challenging other coaches to fights.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACK_fFVfbfk

    But.. that was then.  How often do coaches (any of them) engage in that behavior today?  (not the changing of the lines.. they all do that).

    Yesteryear doesn't win today.  last year everyone was all on about how great the Devils were and how they turned it around so fast... fast forward to now.

    Brunette is the notable difference.

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. 3 hours ago, shrader said:

    So wait, Colorado signed a guy named Ivan Ivan yesterday and no one cares?

    Well, technically it's Ivan Ivan Ivan.  So perhaps people thought it was just Ivan Ivan and everyone was like.. "Meh, there's another guy with 3 Ivan names."

    • Haha (+1) 1
  11. 5 hours ago, DarthEbriate said:

    Reinhart has over 40 goals this season; Tarasenko gets to be a 2nd/3rd liner.

    And in hindsight, maybe $5M is a bit much, but Tarasenko would've been a good 1-year fill-in for Quinn. Then, when Quinn returns if you're in it -- you've got a legit top-6 RW problem. And if you're not in, you do what Ottawa is and ship him out for futures.

    Well... he had a full NTC.. so perhaps they didn't want a Taylor Hall repeat... and it's Tarasenko.

  12. Green agree button if in the past you mocked Mitts for not being able to do a pull-up or how useless he was and are now in this thread dumping on this trade.

    I'm curious how many will self-identify.

    The purpose is only to demonstrate that what we think in one moment may be completely turned around in the future.  Deep breaths.

  13. 3 hours ago, etiennep99 said:

    Studies have shown that it's seriously more difficult to be poor than rich.  Rich person: "oh sure ahead and fix the Porsche". Poor person: "Um, I know that my tires are bald and my battery needs constant jumping, but I have to buy baby food, and I'm out of tooth-paste." 

    Indeed. Although one might argue that if you are not in a position to support a child you should not have one.  But the innate desires of humanity are to survive and procreate. The closer one is to not being able to achieve that goal the more stress will naturally be felt. Furthermore, not being able to take care of oneself leads to additional health issues.  A downward spiral to be certain.

    1 hour ago, 7+6=13 said:

    My wife is a teacher of 24 years in Charlotte NC.  They make approximately 60% less.than teachers in NYS.  So if you'd send us the $13, it would really help.  Yes, we pay for supplies too.  

    Yep.  Although I'd suggest NC see what they can get with their own $13 tax.  My wife stopped teaching because when our daughter was born the cost of child care for two children was almost enough to wash out any salary benefit.  it made way more sense for my wife to not work and take care of the family at that point. Better quality of life for everyone.

  14. 55 minutes ago, freester said:

    I think Muel gets traded to Calgary as part of package for Tkachuk

    Is there another brother that no one is talking about?

    46 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

    It's just confusing from a team building perspective and if he doesn't stay healthy or return to form, we fail... again. 

    If and buts...

    16 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

    Because our GM is incompetent.  

    The biggest tragedy of this deal is Krebs, who is not good, is now our 3rd line center and will be next year.

     

    Stop projecting next year when it hasn't happened yet. Work with what is...

    The thing about this trade that I find interesting is that it was made... now.  The Sabres did not have to trade him now. He was an RFA and they had all summer to try and get a better deal.  The Avs clearly would want to make a deal and apparently Byram was enough to get it done in KA's eyes.  We'll never know what he could have achieved in the off-season where trades tend to be a little bit meatier.

    All of that aside, I am a Byram fan and I think he has significant potential. The addition of another LHD is intriguing. I don't lament losing Mitts as much as I liked what he finally developed into.  Clearly this is not a trade for that changes the Sabres right now and is one made for next season.  So I'll see what else happens with the team before starting next season.

    In the end only the results of the team matter.  This year was not good enough.

    I'll say this.. at least Adams made a hockey trade.  A real one.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  15. 1 hour ago, 7+6=13 said:

    It doesn't bother me anymore that athletes make a lot of money.  They are part of an entity that brings in a certain amount of money and they receive their part based on their value to the team paying them. 

    Kind of like Actors/Actresses.  I had friends and family that would say they're not going to the movies anymore because they're sick of how they act and they aren't supporting that anymore.  Then I mentioned look, you're not paying them millions, you're paying $13 for them to entertain you.  Put it into context.  

    BTW, what athletes go through is actually quite brutal.  You complain about Von, yet if you think for just a minute about what happened to him and what how difficult that was, to then hurry up and get back on the field, it's not for normal people.  

     

     

    It doesn't bother me that people make money.  Who can blame someone for making a good living because millions of people are willing to pay some amount of money for them to play a sport, act, etc. If someone can be part of a product or create a product that nets them incredible amounts of money and they are willing to do what it takes to be part of that product then good for them.

    At the same time, if you buy into the product you are part of the product lifecycle and as such it really reduces any argument one might have against the product itself. In your example above your friends paying $13 doesn't seem like much, but it is a combined situation. If they are staunchly against actors and actresses they should not support the movies because they are supporting those people and their actions. It may only be $13, but it adds up.  If a person isn't willing to own their actions at a personal level then they are just expecting everyone else to shoulder the burden.  It's a cop out.  Putting it into context, if all the taxpayers in NYS spent $13 a year on movies and instead donated that $13 to the NYS Teachers Association to be directly distributed to one of the roughyl 205,000 public school teachers it would be enough to give each teacher an estimated $677.  It might not seem like a lot, but it will help offset what teachers shell out of pocket for teaching supplies.

    Similarly, I don't want people to be injured but I don't place any greater value on what Von Miller goes through from an injury than anyone else.. It's dismissive of "normal" people to say it's not something they could do. There are people who are in physical therapy every day working to get back from an injury and most of them don't have massive paychecks to protect their financial status regardless of what happens.  Those people have added mental strains about how they pay their bills, or make a living if their leg or arm doesn't heal.

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1
  16. 14 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

    Yes, that's true, but he's VERY GOOD at punching guys. I am a firm believer that with all these kids we have (some of them smaller or lighter) we need a guy to protect them. If we had that, many of them would play bigger themselves and feel free to do their thing more. It would help with team building and development of a strong team culture.

    If we make the playoffs guy like that might not dress, and he wouldn't be needed all the time, but having him around would help the team a lot. I believe that strongly. 

    If this guy can learn that punching doesn't solve everything... then so can others.

    Wreck-It Ralph Animation GIF by Disney

    • Haha (+1) 1
  17. On 3/2/2024 at 1:56 PM, JohnC said:

    Do you want to trade for a player who doesn't want to be here? I'm not suggesting that he's a bad guy for not wanting to play for some teams. But I don't want to trade for a player who I know in advance will be unhappy at his new location. 

    Doesn't matter to me if they want to be here or not.  Are they going to pout about it and not perform?  Great. There goes that next contract.  I think players who get traded will play like professionals and do what needs to be done.

    Would I prefer a player who was also happy?  Absolutely.  But I'm not shying away from taking a player who would be unhappy.  As it stands, I doubt ANY player would be happy to be traded from a playoff team to a non-playoff team.  That's business unfortunately.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...