Jump to content

SwampD

Member
  • Posts

    30,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SwampD

  1. 15 minutes ago, PASabreFan said:

    Who would think losing a roster player doesn't hurt. Kyle's had a pretty good season.

    There are folk.

    He has.

    10 minutes ago, Thorny said:

    With the islanders getting hot I think we are well and truly cooked. Moneypuck has us at 1.2%. Only Ottawa at 0.1% remains between us and the teams with 0%.

    KO trade does reinforce that. 

    It’s an abject fail of a season. Puts KA on the hot seat for next. I’m glad to see early signs point to him being proactive in switching some things up. It’s very needed and could bode well. I’m ready to shift my focus to next season and it seems the team is too. For better or worse. 

    I'm at the point where I don't take any of these trades on good faith, anymore. I keep trying to see one thing that tells me that KA and TP are really trying to build a winner. I know they are trying to stay the youngest team in the league (now, by a lot), most likely to (a) have a built in excuse and (b) to have a low payroll.

    BB-4 showing up in that Cancun Crew photo kinda raised my eyebrows. I can't get past this feeling that they are just keeping those here happy enough to not implode, while not having a real answer (or plan) for sucking.

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 12 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

    I honestly just love how you guys want our defense to play physical and strong in front of the net yet one of the guys who does it sucks because he doesn’t do it exactly the way you want. 
     

    Id like Dahlin to stop knocking players into his goalies but at very least the intention to punish the offensive player is there.

    Whatever. My bad. Yes, the Sabres are great and do nothing wrong. I just can't understand why they lose all the time.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  3. 1 hour ago, JohnC said:

    You pointed out that the Sabres got no shots in the first 15 minutes. So what! Toronto controlled the play when the game began, then the tide turned the other way. It's the standard ebb and flow of a hockey game. You point out that some Toronto players were sick. So what! Our most productive offensive player (Mitts) was dealt before the game. This game was relatively even that was tied after three periods. 

    In general, the team played hard and well. They lost in OT and gained a point. If you want to characterize this game in a negative light, then that is your prerogative. If you didn't see any positive play in this game, then so be it. I saw this game differently. If you have problems with the divergence in opinion, big freaking deal.

    Sure seems like you do as well.

    Seeing as slow starts are a continuing issue with this team, I cannot find the fact that it happened again encouraging. That was not a well played game by either team. Even the announcers commented on that fact.

    We got a point. Yay.

  4. 12 minutes ago, JohnC said:

    Did you fall asleep after the first fifteen minutes? Toronto got the first nine shots to start the game. After that, the Sabres got the next 12 shots. The Sabres ended up with 25 shots on net for the game (10-9-3-3) while the Leafs got 27 shots for the game (6-9-10-2). May I kindly offer you a recommendation: When watching the game keep your eyes open for the whole game. 🤡

    Are you calling me a clown? Classy.

    I did watch the whole game. And actually, the Leafs only got the first 6 shots on goal, not 9.

    I know how to watch hockey, and if the outcome of the game was determined by SOG,... well, we would have lost that, too.

    None of that has anything to do with the fact that no shots in the first 15 minutes of a game is not encouraging at any level, especially against a sick Leafs team. Nobody changes the goalposts like you.

    Time for a break. I'm tired of people pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining.

×
×
  • Create New...