Jump to content

Doohickie

Members
  • Posts

    39,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Doohickie

  1. 11 hours ago, Pimlach said:

    Not to single out Samuelsson but his quote, like many of the the others, is a big part of Adams talking points. 

    Why didn't Adams step in?  He is learning his job on the fly too.  

    Practice harder?   That is on the coaches first and foremost, but this is why you need those guys that never want to leave the ice after practice.  Need a few that call out the one that are not getting it.   

    Until the right leadership emerges within the players, the coach has to do more to instill leadership.

    I actually thought Samuelsson's remarks differed markedly from the rest of the team.  He put this squarely on the players when he said, "I would say we wouldn't really need to bring in, like, veteran leadership.  I think guys have been in the league long enough now where it's on us.  We don't need someone else to tell us how to do it."

    Granted, it was in reference to veteran leadership rather than coaching, but it seemed like he was taking ownership of it more than the other players.

  2. 2 hours ago, Sabre The Cup said:

    What happened to the guys who were SO UPSET at the fans chanting “Fire Donnie”. 
     

    I have a feeling these guys don’t know what they think. 

    This is actually a really good point, but on the other hand it's the way a lot of us on Sabrespace feel:  Donny is a helluva nice guy, just not an NHL caliber coach.

  3. 2 hours ago, dudacek said:

    Really curious if they take a look at cutting ties with Skinner because he’s the sole exception I could see to the above.

    Jeff Skinner at his worst is Victor Olofsson at his best.  Jeff had a "terrible" year this year and was third on the team in goals.  He had a -2 in the +/- which isn't great but neither is it a disgrace. 

    I think one of the challenges the new coach will have will be finding a role for Skinner.  Maybe it will be on the power play and playing wing on a protected third line like he was at the end of the year with Krebs and Greenway.  Maybe it will be on a second line as a scorer.  Skinner has a unique skillset and some flaws but he's shown he can still light the lamp, even on an off year.

    I know he's one of the whipping boys this year and has been for some posters for a long time, but I think he will have a bounce back year next year and score about 35.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 30 minutes ago, Mr Peabody said:

    Intentionally or not the exit interviews seem to toss Donnie under the bus and with Muel’s comments maybe Kyle and the A’s as well?  

    With the youth on the team, and the ascension through Donny's coaching tenure until dropping off this year, I think the younger players on the team basically took for granted that they should just follow the leader.... "Trust the process."  With the dip this year and Donny's firing, I think it was a wakeup call to all the younger players on the team.  I think this will make all these guys take more ownership in the process going forward.

    And I think that's what I found interesting in Muel's statement.  To me it articulated that sentiment.  "it's on us."

    Because face it, the core of this team is not a bunch of young kids anymore.  They are, collectively hitting their career primes at the same time.  It's been painful to get to this point and they are by no means over the hump, but when Kevyn said he had a plan I think having a large group of players all peaking at the same time was part of that plan.  Then you feed in a Benson this year, maybe a Savoie or Kulich next..., and keep the train a rollin', even when you have to move some of the more developed players because it would mess up the cap structure.

    I know that sounds like rose colored glasses but really, for me as a fan, I have to have a future that looks bright.  I have to believe in the team and the direction it's going.  Realistically it likely won't work as swimmingly as what I mapped out, but I need a light at the end of the tunnel.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 2
  5. And I'm not saying he's the next captain or anything.  I just thought what he said was interesting.

    I mean everyone's busting on the team because other players said they need to be pushed harder.  Now Muel says, no, we need to do it for ourselves and when I post it I get panned for it.

     

     

    Some days you just can't win.

    • Thanks (+1) 1
  6. 19 minutes ago, Slack_in_MA said:

    And we’re listening to Muel opine about leadership because…?

    Does anyone consider him to be any kind of authority on the subject?

    Work on your durability, young man.

    He speaks with an authority beyond his years.  Teammates have said as much.  It might be because he grew up in an NHL family.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • dislike 1
  7. "I would say we wouldn't really need to bring in, like, veteran leadership.  I think guys have been in the league long enough now where it's on us.  We don't need someone else to tell us how to do it."

    I've been thinking this to an extent.  They jettisoned Okie and several people have mentioned in the exit interviews and discussions about them how the new coach will likely want to bring in veteran leaders.  I think the leaders are here.  I'm not saying we shouldn't bring in any veterans to fill needs on the team, but I really don't think leadership is something we have to bring in.  Dahlin will be in his 7th NHL season next year.  Clifton's 28.  Tuch is 27.  A lot of players are 25.

    I think a lot of the players had a real reality check this year rather than losing their love for the game, they seem, as a team, to be more determined to improve next year.

    • Like (+1) 4
    • Thanks (+1) 1
  8. 17 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

    If any of this is true it would mean that Adams was spewing total lies in his press conference and thus I'd suggest everything else he said might have been lies as well. Just saying. 

    Anyway, I'd be more than happy if he did sell. He'd make a tidy profit and we'd have to look for someone else to blame. Everybody happy. 

    What "lies" would those be?

  9. 4 hours ago, dudacek said:
    5 hours ago, Mr Peabody said:

    Based purely upon exit interviews I’d pick Thompson.

    Glad to see I'm not the only one.

    I wouldn't have a problem with Thompson.  I think Tuch would be my personal first choice but I think there's an intense but quiet fire burning inside Tommer.

  10. Oh, I'm still about 20 pounds into the Obese range of BMI, and I can't claim "but I'm a muscular build" because I'm basically a skinny kid that got old and fat.  I can't get younger but I wouldn't mind being skinny again.

  11. I was wondering who actually fired Ruff and would Lindy harbor any ill will toward the Sabres which is how I tripped over the article.  From the article,

    Quote

    When the Sabres fired Ruff, Terry Pegula released a statement saying that Ruff “can consider me a friend always.”

    In general, the article did make me feel a bit better about the prospect of hiring Ruff.

     

    2 minutes ago, MISabresFan said:

    Internet talk is he might become available before the new contract kicks in...

    What kind of team would do such a thing???

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...