-
Posts
39,326 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Thorny
-
Sabres Trade the 11th pick to San Jose for 14th and 42nd Overall
Thorny replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Have you shifted your stance on this? I’ve always gotten a hard time for supporting this -
Sabres Trade the 11th pick to San Jose for 14th and 42nd Overall
Thorny replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
I guess Draft Pick 11 didn’t want to be here- 183 replies
-
- 23
-
-
-
Sabres Trade the 11th pick to San Jose for 14th and 42nd Overall
Thorny replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
We’ve made 30 picks the last 3 drafts. We can’t just go up and make all the picks this year, we really can’t -
Sabres Trade the 11th pick to San Jose for 14th and 42nd Overall
Thorny replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
I am the “trade down makes sense” guy so, there’s that if we don’t trade one of these picks or prospects in the next couple days I’d have to say I hate it, though -
I suppose their theory would be retaining the production in the top 6 without torpedoing the way the line plays, with seems to be the consensus which how Skinner sort of takes over the shift dynamics ie, maybe Necas’ numbers look similar to Skinner there but his C and RW’s look better?
-
The fact of the matter is the Buffalo Sabres have averaged 76 points per season the 4 years Adams has been here. So why would they? I told you this would happen, the folly of touting purely relative improvement rather than relative to the league as a whole Frankly, one year ago: Not only did that misstep come to fruition, it was worse than I predicted by 5 points The league sees a 76 point club because we are a 76 point club. No one is going “well actually 84”. We are what Adams has amounted to so far
-
Right, but I’m the guy saying I didn’t want to buyout Skinner the cap shouldn’t be the concern right now. It’s verging on bizarro world laughable right now the amount of cap prioritizing we do when we don’t even have evidence we’d even use the money haha. And we have so much space. Until we make the playoffs the concern, the priority needs to be TALENT IN. As much as possible. Worry about sorting out the 4 year cap issues in 4 years focusing on the concerns of later as opposed to now IS a self fulfilling prophecy where we don’t prioritize now so don’t win now
-
He seemed so reluctant to finally push in on it being the team’s time to win, I wouldn’t be surprised if these deals are falling through because he takes such a hard line on value all the time and is reluctant to be flexible
-
The Sabres aren’t in a *position* to turn their noses up at new paint We need every point we can get This is basically me
-
And like I said, block away Wouldn’t want to give up father’s stuff. Father gets mad - - - I actually think Necas is pretty good and played t6 on a good team so if we couldn’t make that work on even a PLAYOFF team I think the issue lies more with the constructors isn’t everyone saying Skinner is a net negative now? Does Necas provide negative value?
-
For the record I think the feature is bad. But i have to play by the rules of the board. Like I said I’ve given out as many likes as anyone, but the feature only works of it’s not unbalanced. You have to use the range of them imo if at all
-
That’s not what the connotation of Flash’s post implied but whatever. I’m moving on at this point, block as necessary
-
My guy you could have responded to my post with anything. A discussion, constructive criticism…instead you quoted it to say one sentence neither here nor there re: my post about the way I slotted my lines You disagree he could be the best available or disagree he’d be better than running it back?
-
You realize I’ve given out more likes than every other poster, right? Why are you piling on? three red Xs. So scary
-
This is honestly exceptionally troubling only because we’ve been theorizing in exact words that a lot of what Adams does or pushes out there seems to be in the vein of setting up the “we tried” punchline
-
I have all the experience with grit I need having to trudge through your posting content in the last year.
-
He may also very well he the best option. Adding Necas is certainly better than running it back. I mean look at this. Here we go….
-
And? I like how everyone suggests the concept of balanced lines in theory but the moment you create a lineup on the internet not slotted precisely by perceived rank it’s an issue Thanks for the input tho
-
Jeff Skinner rumors, trade and buyout speculation swirling
Thorny replied to Flashsabre's topic in The Aud Club
I suppose the question is whether Benson and Johnson had actual viable competition to surpass. Olofsson was a reflection of inaction in replacing Quinn and how likely was Eric Johnson to provide a meaningful block? You don’t have to term it “blocking” but the spirit of the term is thst you keep the runway clear for internal improvement. That IS what the 2023 offseason was -
Jeff Skinner rumors, trade and buyout speculation swirling
Thorny replied to Flashsabre's topic in The Aud Club
People are too hung on line designations which are often arbitrary. The “3C” may get a ton of minutes if he’s on the pp or pk, or they are the matchups line, or an equal balance among the 3 or 4. $7.5 isn’t too much for a guy who slots into 3C on a lineup card on the internet if his ability is akin to having the value of $7.5 million Having 2nd liners on the 3rd line is sort of exactly what you are after we’ve just been divorced from the concept for so long. Of course everyone wants a BARGAIN but you only run into issues of your guys are overpaid relative to their value, not lineups slotting. They remain very tradeable assets if necessary. Part of what we said was the benefit to locking up Thompson and cozens to 7 mil deals is that we’d HAVE the cash to utilize elsewhere. That was also part of the point this isn’t an argument specifically for necas btw just the concept -
Jeff Skinner rumors, trade and buyout speculation swirling
Thorny replied to Flashsabre's topic in The Aud Club
Not at the expense of spiting your face this can be part of the logic that informs the move but it can’t just be addition by subtraction, as you’ve already pointed out I believe -
He’s averaged over 60 points the last 2 seasons though combined. I bet you the average output for 11 overall is less. Never mind the massive premium there should be on the immediacy of the asset. Necas being good now is much more valuable than hypothetical equal production in 5 years - - - These moves will all work in combination with eachother, right? Who was that guy from Washington we were apparently targeting with ridiculous D heavy usage? Dowd? So they stick him on line 3 and run him heavy on D again allowing the 2nd line with Benson - Cozens - Necas to run wild on O. It brings me back to preferring a better 4C instead of Krebs so we can lean of line 4 in a defensive way too but I suppose many have confidence in his defensive abilities
-
I bet you he’d be the top 6 W add Peterka - Thompson - Tuch Benson - Cozens - Necas Greenway - X - Quinn X - Krebs - X Already thinking about flipping him lol. let’s make the playoffs
-
Sure. I’ll mail the pick to the airport myself
-
I mean it’s definitely running it back if we did nothing else of note. But we will - - - I see a lot of poo-pooing of Necas online but I like him I think. Those rumours to me are intriguing