Jump to content

Kr632

Members
  • Posts

    491
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kr632

  1. 25 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

    When will Adams be accountable for the on ice product?    You still have not told us.  So far you have said he inherited a mess. True.   You talk about a stealth tank.  I don’t see anything stealth about it.    
     

    When will YOU consider Adams responsible and accountable?   Next year, year after that…. ?   

    You expect people to answer questions they haven't been asked? 

    I stealth tank was another posters words that I used. But it is not as obvious as the last when we sold off anything of value. 

    The situation is tough to judge but he's done some good(drafting) and some bad(goaltending). Ownership stripped him of a lot of resources, the top players were counting the days until they could leave, no good free agents want to play here, not many good coaches want to coach here. 

    That takes some time to fix. I think it's closer than it looks. I would say next season we should be competing for playoffs if we aren't there's a problem. 

    Goaltending and some upgrades on defense would go a long way. We have two defensive prospects that should be upgrades coming next year. Finding a good goalie is huge. But we should have ammo to do it. 

     

  2. 3 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

    Understanding reality is even better. You don’t even understand how waivers works, so  how can you begin to criticize the GM? 
     

    I am not anti-Adams btw, but I will call out his shortcomings.  His handling of Ullmark and our goaltending has been terrible and it is holding back the other good work he has done.    
     

    Watch the games.  Look at the mistakes all over the ice.  They weren’t there the first month.  
     

    Adams is in danger of his players quitting, which puts the coach in a very bad position.  

    I completely understand how waivers work but I also understand that these players are people and can say no. Where did I criticize the GM?  

    So Adams has said since he got here that he wants players that want to be here. What sense would it make to bring in someone that he knew didn't want to be here even if it is on waivers and the player has "no choice"? Now he looks like a liar to the team, adds a cancer to the room to influence the kids and we're back to where we were with Murray 

  3. Just now, nucci said:

     I'm paying attention . You want to accept this and enjoy, go ahead. I'll enjoy being pissed at this franchise and the owners for making this mess

    Yes the owners. Not KA which is my entire point. He's cleaning up the mess of owners and former GMs. This is his 2nd year cleaning up a team that has finished last in the league what three times in last 6 years and it's top players all wanted out at the same time. It takes time to fix a mess like that. Expecting him to do it in a year and a half is unrealistic

  4. 9 minutes ago, nucci said:

    then this franchise is a bigger mess than we thought if all they want to do is lose

    It's been pretty obvious that this was the plan once ullmark signed in Boston and nobody else wanted to come here except the 750 club. Are you not paying attention?

     

    This is a year to develop the prospects. For the most part they're playing pretty well.

  5. 8 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

    Really?  A waiver claim has no choice either does a trade without trade protection.   If a player doesn’t show, that can end a career.

    Yes really. I don't think you understand the words you're using. Saying no choice then giving a choice isn't exactly no choice. It happens all the time. The sports world isn't black and white like everyone thinks it is.

    You would think with KA saying we want players that want to be here all the time that maybe he actually thinks that way

×
×
  • Create New...