JujuFish

Excuse me? Cherry picking? Your image literally proves what I said. Hollins and Cooper, and their 106 yards, are gone.

Speaking of Allen, you don't see many QBs do this: Threw a pick, made the tackle, forced the fumble through the endzone to get it back for a 1st down, further down the field than he started. Never give up on a play. I also like how he immediately signaled the touchback.

You think the receivers performing better wouldn't have helped them win? You think having a criticism of one aspect means the entire loss is to blame on that one aspect? Shakir was high in separation because his aDOT was under 3 yards. He caught a ton of screen passes which boosts his catch percentage as well as his separation numbers. Coleman was dead. last. in the league in separation. He has quite literally nowhere to go but up. Someone doesn't agree with you, obviously that just means they know very, very little. Good argument.

It is actually true. It's one of the reasons Dan Orlovsky voted for Allen over Jackson for MVP. He explicitly stated that Buffalo had a bottom 5 team at separation. I don't have access to PFF grades anymore, but their data also agrees.

Woops, I counted the TEs. It's even worse than that. Shakir: 46 yards Coleman: 12 yards Samuel: 4 yards 62 yards.

Just saying what? 82. That's how many yards WRs had against KC in the AFC CG that are still on the team. 82. But no, the WR room is fine. Good. Perfect, even.

BIlls receivers were among the worst in the league in separation and it took a literal MVP effort from Allen to produce with them. And then they lost one of their key receivers in Mack Hollins. To say that the WR room isn't a concern is foolish.

I don't follow enough college football to have any sense of the draft. I'm just curious to see who we pick after the fact and also hoping like hell the Patriots don't get Travis Hunter.

If you look at the data, you'll see that Buffalo's average large cheese or pepperoni pizza is more expensive than any other city in the top 7. That means more expensive than (in order) Rochester, Philly, Boston, Detroit, New Haven, and Pittsburgh. It's not until NYC at 8th that a more expensive pizza comes into play.

Congrats to Lindy for his 600th win as a Sabres HC.

I haven't checked out this season yet, but I think I like the TV show more than most fans of the books. Looking forward to bingeing the season when it's all released.

The Bills' receiving corps was one of the worst in the league at getting separation. Imagine how much more deadly it would be if they could get open.

I haven't even remotely indicated that I don't know what reparations are. The fact that you say something over and over doesn't make it true. But that is the Trumpian way. Lie, lie, lie, and people will eventually believe it. I asked you to connect the logic. Since you can't, you resort to "you lack an understanding". So, this tells me you can't follow the logical steps that resulted in your conclusion *or* that your conclusion was a lie and that you knew there was no way to logically connect the two. Either way, you failed spectacularly.

Eichel was never dominant here. He has clearly continued to mature his game in Vegas. That said, McDavid is the best player of the generation, and it's foolish to think we didn't have to settle for Eichel. Downright lunacy. Ah yes, I keep whining. I made one *single* post about it, which offended you. Now, go search through my post history and tell me when was the last time I whined about it.

So your point is that you have nothing relevant to say. Got it.

How is that an argument against the fact that we had to settle for Eichel? Lots of players aren't bad to have on your team if your goal is to win a cup. So, again I say, your point?

There are AHL players with more cups than McDavid. Your point?

Every time I see Connor McDavid, I am reminded about how we had to settle for Eichel.

I really wanted the crowd to not boo because, unlike the Canadians regarding the USA, we have no reason to be upset with Canada.

You seem to think you're making a point here, but you're not. You're proposing we strong-arm an ally rather than an enemy. There is no logical reason for it, unless you're a simp for the enemy. My "apparent definition" has nothing to do with the US and China. Please connect those dots for me, because I'm here on earth, not in space cadet territory. Who, exactly, did China invade that we provided military aid to? What "trade agreement" am I trying to defend that I should be against? And apparently you don't understand how to address points on a message board. You quote the part that is relevant, rather than the entire mess of a post.

Oh, so we didn't get our allies to pay us for the money we spent on World War II? We got them from the aggressor nation instead? And you want to get reparations from Ukraine, not Russia? And you say you're not simping for Russia? Huh, odd. Could have fooled me.

Remind me again, who paid reparations after World War II? Was it our allies? And we now have Trump blaming Ukraine for the war. As if it couldn't be any more obvious that he is completely corrupt and under Putin's thumb. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-ukraine-should-never-have-started-it-remarks-war-russia-rcna192710

It's so amusing seeing conservatives simp for Putin.

After seeing it was 4-0 with under 10 to go, my hopes of Sweden squeaking into the finals ended, but dang Finland almost forced OT.

If the Biden/Harris administration was so bad, why did less than half the voters pick Trump?