Hank

What are you trying to do? Are you looking for a "gotcha" moment? In the post you quoted i clearly stated I supported a military presence to quell the riots in LA. I also clearly questioned the legality of it.

That's not close to what I said, but you know that.

Friendly SCOTUS. Yes, I agree. I hastily said SC when I meant the DC Circuit. I know you're aware it's the DCC. That's my bad. What's interesting about the DCC is that seven of the 11 members are democratic appointees. How in the hell did two of the four republican appointees get selected to a three member panel? Seems improbable. Anywho, the ruled how they did, we'll see if it's appealed. I assumed you were referring to LA because I agree with you there's a question of legality there. I did not think you were referring to DC because POTUS is the commander of the DCNG and can deploy them as they see fit, there's no question of legality there. I'm not sure what their role was, if they worked independently or in tandem with local police. I suspect the latter but I'm not sure. DOGE - I don't need a left slanted POLITICO article to realize I'm disappointed with how it turned out, I got there all on my own. I was captivated by it and was let down. Truth be told though I think it did more good than bad.

Defying federal judges - if you're referring to Broberg, his ruling was vacated by the SC. Deploying military in the streets - if you're talking about LA, ICE agents were under attack, Bass wouldn't allow police to assist in a timely manner, Newsome refused to send in the guard. That wasn't a peaceful protest, that was rioting and looting. Trump did the right thing sending in the troops to quell the riots when Newsome refused to do it. Was it legal? I have idea, but I support his decision. BLS director - i agree with you, it looks shady. They say in the article that quarterly reports will be used until they implement a system that will give accurate data in a more timely manner than go back to the monthly reports, we'll see.

Texas senate passed the redistricting maps. The house will pass it as soon as they get enough bodies for a quarum. I thought it HAD to go through the house first? Guess not. It'll be interesting to see if Newsome/Hochul follow through with their threats to retaliate in kind. For those that live in New York, are there seats to be gained? I thought New York was already deep blue. https://www.texastribune.org/2025/08/11/texas-redistricting-map-vote-senate/

K-9, thank you.

One. What would you like my opinion on?

Anyone understand what this means? Is it something positive or a nothingburger? https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

Who's giddy? Eric Daugherty? Ken Paxton? Jasmine Crockett?

Things are escalating in TX, Democrats having their funds frozen until they return.

What it excludes are "Indians not taxed and three fifths of all other persons." What it includes is "free Persons, including those bound to service for a term of years." Those terms seem outdated. Tens of millions of illegal immigrants was not a concern back then. I don't believe a favorable Supreme Court ruling is the slam dunk you think it is.

Boasberg ruling vacated https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/08/08/politics/boasberg-criminal-contempt-trump-immigration?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=17546688721971&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2025%2F08%2F08%2Fpolitics%2Fboasberg-criminal-contempt-trump-immigration

Not to my knowledge, no. I would imagine congress republicans can push it through and we know that Trump will sign it. Trump didn't have a bill in 2020. If it gets through the republican congress, and i think we all believe it will, Trump will sign it into law. Carter made the mid decade census lawfull. This happening is a real possibility.

You maybe missed the House of Representatives vote on May 8, 2024, before Trump won the election, passing by a vote of 206-202? House of Representatives passes Edwards’ bill to only include U.S. citizens in congressional representation I believe it was stated that the census is not for the purpose of redrawing Congressional districts, you're correct in that not being allowed. I believe the purpose is to eliminate large numbers of illegals, especially in sanctuary cities and states, from the census in an effort to reduce number of seats in blue districts. I'm not saying it's right, or i agree with it, just sharing something i find interesting.

Trump’s mid decade census is authorized by law and will help strip blue states of funding flowing to illegal aliens. This authority is based on HR 11337, which authorized a mid decade redistricting. It was passed in 1976 under a Democrat House and Senate and then signed into law by Jimmy Carter. It requires that eligibility for federal benefits and fund allocations be based on the most recent decennial or mid-decade census data. However, it prohibits the use of mid-decade census data for apportioning seats in the House of Representatives or redrawing congressional districts.

This is not correct at all. Every ten years has been the standard, but it CAN be done more frequently, it just hasn't been done before Trump. And no, illegal immigrants should not be counted in the census. On this we agree.

Trump tells the Dept of Commerce to redo the Census and remove illegal aliens from it

Trumps timing on this is horrible, he should have fired her in January.

Fair of you to ask. No thoughts, just sharing articles from left wing pundits that otherwise would never see the light of day in our tiny corner of the internet. Whether the trade deal with the EU turns out to be positive or negative remains to be seen.

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-sp500-nasdaq-07-25-2025/card/nearly-half-of-voters-rate-economy-as-good-or-excellent-under-trump-iBjaYcnTiOOF4k16nxby?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAhFYn0mnBrguPHtkMcKVWhBq-0oBbO0X--tw3tzCuZMu7gE_QgR8rwrj4Rliwg%3D&gaa_ts=6886e78c&gaa_sig=oY4UeSff46bPgx9-eaBGhIK2e15BOqTUb9acROEDoB_JTBMb_zOAr8NmC701BhF2JITAnVSeOLLX924khm2rOg%3D%3D

https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/07/27/stock-market-today-live-updates.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=17536643446259&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2025%2F07%2F27%2Fstock-market-today-live-updates.html

https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/07/27/business/trump-us-eu-trade-deal?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=17536639816560&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2025%2F07%2F27%2Fbusiness%2Ftrump-us-eu-trade-deal

The bolded is a stupid thing to say. The only other forum I'm a member of is twobillsdrive and I've never been banned. It's what libtards do, baseless accusations when triggered. Trump is an idiot, you're not breaking news there. Unlike you and K-9, I don't openly root for my country to fail to spite him.

OVER 77 MILLION AMERICANS SUPPORT PEDOPHILES BECAUSE THEY VOTED FOR TRUMP!!!! ARRRRGH! Say that out loud and listen to how ridiculous that sounds. You do it often. Frequently quoting posts that make no reference to Trump.

The fact they were picked up at the Canadian border as opposed to the Mexican border is not relevant to me. What IS relevant to me is that five Iranians attempted to enter the country a few weeks after we bombed them. I guess it's easy to miss that when your TDS is triggered. You clowns do entertain me though. CHEETO MAN! MAGA! TARRIFS! ARRRRGH!!!!!! It's pathetic, but i love it 🤣🤣