Sabres73 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 18 hours ago, SHAAAUGHT!!! said: Thanks for sharing this. It was nice to see some understanding and compassion in this thread instead of pitchforks and holier-than-thou perspectives. If he wasnt on company time, and maybe even if we was, Adam Mair doesn’t and shouldn’t be fired. He should get some help and likely therapy because I’m assuming he’s as upset at Adam Mair as everyone else is. Pointing out he was hammered with three kids in the car isn't exactly "pitchforks and holier-than-thou." It's completely reasonable. 1 Quote
SHAAAUGHT!!! Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 10 hours ago, Sabres73 said: Pointing out he was hammered with three kids in the car isn't exactly "pitchforks and holier-than-thou." It's completely reasonable. Yes it’s reasonable because it happened. What isn’t reasonable is assuming he should lose his job and ability to care for himself and his kids, yeah? also, and not to you Sabres73, if you laughed at my original response you are only exposing yourself for the type of person you are. Real recognizes real. Basic ***** need not apply. Not sorry at all. Edited 9 hours ago by SHAAAUGHT!!! Further reading explanation for the people without any life experience and/or empathy Quote
LGR4GM Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 33 minutes ago, SHAAAUGHT!!! said: Yes it’s reasonable because it happened. What isn’t reasonable is assuming he should lose his job and ability to care for himself and his kids, yeah? also, and not to you Sabres73, if you laughed at my original response you are only exposing yourself for the type of person you are. Real recognizes real. Basic ***** need not apply. Not sorry at all. What consequences, in your opinion, should Mair face for his actions? Quote
Sabres73 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, SHAAAUGHT!!! said: Yes it’s reasonable because it happened. What isn’t reasonable is assuming he should lose his job and ability to care for himself and his kids, yeah? also, and not to you Sabres73, if you laughed at my original response you are only exposing yourself for the type of person you are. Real recognizes real. Basic ***** need not apply. Not sorry at all. No, I disagree. It's not 100% he will lose his job over this, but it would be absolutely reasonable if he did for risking the lives of three children because he was drunk, as many others in the same circumstances would. The type of person I am is someone who is concerned for the safety of the children and others. The only person exposing the "type of person" they are is you. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.