Jump to content

Doohickie

Members
  • Posts

    38,952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Doohickie

  1. 2 hours ago, dudacek said:

    Really curious if they take a look at cutting ties with Skinner because he’s the sole exception I could see to the above.

    Jeff Skinner at his worst is Victor Olofsson at his best.  Jeff had a "terrible" year this year and was third on the team in goals.  He had a -2 in the +/- which isn't great but neither is it a disgrace. 

    I think one of the challenges the new coach will have will be finding a role for Skinner.  Maybe it will be on the power play and playing wing on a protected third line like he was at the end of the year with Krebs and Greenway.  Maybe it will be on a second line as a scorer.  Skinner has a unique skillset and some flaws but he's shown he can still light the lamp, even on an off year.

    I know he's one of the whipping boys this year and has been for some posters for a long time, but I think he will have a bounce back year next year and score about 35.

  2. 30 minutes ago, Mr Peabody said:

    Intentionally or not the exit interviews seem to toss Donnie under the bus and with Muel’s comments maybe Kyle and the A’s as well?  

    With the youth on the team, and the ascension through Donny's coaching tenure until dropping off this year, I think the younger players on the team basically took for granted that they should just follow the leader.... "Trust the process."  With the dip this year and Donny's firing, I think it was a wakeup call to all the younger players on the team.  I think this will make all these guys take more ownership in the process going forward.

    And I think that's what I found interesting in Muel's statement.  To me it articulated that sentiment.  "it's on us."

    Because face it, the core of this team is not a bunch of young kids anymore.  They are, collectively hitting their career primes at the same time.  It's been painful to get to this point and they are by no means over the hump, but when Kevyn said he had a plan I think having a large group of players all peaking at the same time was part of that plan.  Then you feed in a Benson this year, maybe a Savoie or Kulich next..., and keep the train a rollin', even when you have to move some of the more developed players because it would mess up the cap structure.

    I know that sounds like rose colored glasses but really, for me as a fan, I have to have a future that looks bright.  I have to believe in the team and the direction it's going.  Realistically it likely won't work as swimmingly as what I mapped out, but I need a light at the end of the tunnel.

  3. And I'm not saying he's the next captain or anything.  I just thought what he said was interesting.

    I mean everyone's busting on the team because other players said they need to be pushed harder.  Now Muel says, no, we need to do it for ourselves and when I post it I get panned for it.

     

     

    Some days you just can't win.

    • Thanks (+1) 1
  4. 19 minutes ago, Slack_in_MA said:

    And we’re listening to Muel opine about leadership because…?

    Does anyone consider him to be any kind of authority on the subject?

    Work on your durability, young man.

    He speaks with an authority beyond his years.  Teammates have said as much.  It might be because he grew up in an NHL family.

  5. "I would say we wouldn't really need to bring in, like, veteran leadership.  I think guys have been in the league long enough now where it's on us.  We don't need someone else to tell us how to do it."

    I've been thinking this to an extent.  They jettisoned Okie and several people have mentioned in the exit interviews and discussions about them how the new coach will likely want to bring in veteran leaders.  I think the leaders are here.  I'm not saying we shouldn't bring in any veterans to fill needs on the team, but I really don't think leadership is something we have to bring in.  Dahlin will be in his 7th NHL season next year.  Clifton's 28.  Tuch is 27.  A lot of players are 25.

    I think a lot of the players had a real reality check this year rather than losing their love for the game, they seem, as a team, to be more determined to improve next year.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thanks (+1) 1
  6. 17 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

    If any of this is true it would mean that Adams was spewing total lies in his press conference and thus I'd suggest everything else he said might have been lies as well. Just saying. 

    Anyway, I'd be more than happy if he did sell. He'd make a tidy profit and we'd have to look for someone else to blame. Everybody happy. 

    What "lies" would those be?

  7. 4 hours ago, dudacek said:
    5 hours ago, Mr Peabody said:

    Based purely upon exit interviews I’d pick Thompson.

    Glad to see I'm not the only one.

    I wouldn't have a problem with Thompson.  I think Tuch would be my personal first choice but I think there's an intense but quiet fire burning inside Tommer.

  8. Oh, I'm still about 20 pounds into the Obese range of BMI, and I can't claim "but I'm a muscular build" because I'm basically a skinny kid that got old and fat.  I can't get younger but I wouldn't mind being skinny again.

  9. I was wondering who actually fired Ruff and would Lindy harbor any ill will toward the Sabres which is how I tripped over the article.  From the article,

    Quote

    When the Sabres fired Ruff, Terry Pegula released a statement saying that Ruff “can consider me a friend always.”

    In general, the article did make me feel a bit better about the prospect of hiring Ruff.

     

    2 minutes ago, MISabresFan said:

    Internet talk is he might become available before the new contract kicks in...

    What kind of team would do such a thing???

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 2
  10. 10 hours ago, GoPuckYourself said:

    Whoever the ownership was involved in this should never be allowed to own another sports team again.

    On the contrary, the NHL said that Meruelo will have the right to buy an expansion franchise for the Phoenix area for the next 5 years.  I don't think he will get his act together and get an arena built in the next 5 years so no more NHL in Arizona for probably upwards of a decade.

  11. 7 minutes ago, nfreeman said:

    I'm not sure whom I want.  I freaking love Lindy, and I'm pretty sure that he would've gotten them into the playoffs this year, and this team kinda feels like they could bust out like Lindy's 2005-06 Sabres, but bringing him back kinda feels like a desperation move by a loser franchise.

    My view is more practical than that:  There's too much baggage here between Lindy (who still lives in Clarence I believe), the city, the franchise and Kevyn himself.  Lindy was the guy who hired Kevyn into the Sabres org as an assistant coach.  I think there is literally too much of a conflict of interest here.

    Two scenarios:  Lindy gets them to the playoffs this coming season and it's a storybook ending.  Or the team struggles out of the gate and Lindy needs to be let go.  Everyone projects the first scenario, but if the second occurs it will crumble any thoughts that Kevyn can exercise sound judgment.  If Lindy stumbles it would likely mean both Lindy and Kevyn would be done.  It's one thing to pick the wrong coach.  It's something else to pick the wrong coach because he's an old buddy of yours.

×
×
  • Create New...