jad1

Yeah, they just took another winger. Hard to imagine what the center position looks like in Rochester over the next few years. The Red Wings look like their building from the net out. Not the most exciting strategy, but it makes sense.

There would have to be more than one center prospect coming back in a trade. The pipeline is pretty dry after Cozens.

Building a team from the wings in is a common strategy, I think?

So Adams doesn't believe that any centers taken in the first three rounds of the last two drafts will make it to the NHL? That doesn't seem right. The lack of center prospects in the pipeline will hurt this team in the near future.

I agree. This team has no intention of competing for a playoff spot this season. We'll see if Adams has the sense to protect the younger guys (keeping Cozens in Rochester), but Dahlin and Mittlestadt are the next guys to go.

If Hall wouldn't have signed here without the NMC, then Kev should have moved on. There's no reason why Sabres GMs have to be pants'd on every deal they make.

It would have if our rube GM didn't add a NMC to Hall's one-year $8M contract.

When Eric Staal was entering his 6th year, yes he was worth a 1st round pick. If they they decide to trade Olofsson, should Kev the Rube ask for nothing higher than a 7th round pick?

Because that's how the NHL works?

Straight up, this trade is the way worse than the O'Reilly trade, and that trade was the worse trade in the history of the franchise. Adams might as well show up to the draft wearing a straw hat holding a giant lollipop, because the guy is a total rube. Opposing GMs will now flood him with trash offers, knowing that no offer is too crappy for Adams to accept. Players, want out of Buffalo? Just insinuate that you don't want to be here, and Kevy will accept any deal no matter how awful to grant your your wish. Kevyn Adams, what a rube.

I think we're saying the same thing. Trading Eichel based on the belief that he has aged-out of a younger core is asinine. That's why I brought up Keith and Kane.

Right, because a 24 year old Eichel is the same as a washed up 38 year old Staal, or a 40 year old Gionta. And a I would take Dunlop as a player coach if he wasn't, you know, dead.

Trading the 13th pick with Eichel would be a disaster. The goal of trading Eichel is to fill the pipeline. Quantity over quality. That doesn't happen if they're packaging up picks with the best player involved in the trade. Adams did a nice job adding a 1st for Risto. If he trades Eichel and Reinhart, the Sabres better end up with 4 first round picks in this draft.

Duncan Keith is 6 years older than Patrick Kane, which is about the same age difference between Eichel and this year's draft class. Chicago was able to build a championship team with a significant age difference between their star players. Why shouldn't Buffalo try to do the same.

Negativity? Funny, I thought terrible coaching killed success. I thought terrible trades killed success. I thought horrible free agent signings killed success. I thought that crappy player development killed success. I thought bad goaltending killed success. I never considered that the point-a- game, border-line MVP center was the reason for killing success! I guess I was judging him by his performance on the ice instead by his performance in interviews. 🤔 So the only two productive players that were able rise above the total sh##show this franchise has been the last three seasons WERE the problem! I admit I totally missed that. Maybe you're right. Maybe what this franchise needs is a couple of 20 year old prospects with a can-do attitude and a bunch of Cody Eakins! I just remember a couple of seasons ago when the team dressed 7 defensemen on a nightly basis, playing in front of blind goalie, with a 3rd line winger playing 2nd line center, under a coach who spent the previous 6 seasons in the EPL, while Jack was setting team records. Who knew that he was REALLY the reason the team was losing. I mean, c'mon Jack, why do you keep starting that blind goalie! Seriously though, we've heard this before. Kane was a negative influence. O'Reilly was a negative influence. Whatever the reason for trading those guys, it did nothing to fix the locker room. Addition by subtraction in those cases did fix the culture and it didn't fix the result on the ice. And neither of those things will be fixed when Eichel and Reinhart are traded. Eichel and Reinhart are not the problem with this team, no matter how much we arm-chair psychologists criticize them for pouting and moping while scoring a combined 140 points in a season. The problem is that this team has been completely mismanaged. Instead of bringing competent, experienced veteren managers and coaches, Pegula has brought in a slew of inexperienced sociopaths and hucksters who couldn't figure out a way to build a winning organization around productive players like Eichel and Reinhart. I apologize for the screed. I don't like arguing with fellow Sabre fans. And I hope I'm wrong and you're right, because more than anything I want our team to be relevant again. It just feels like we've been down this road before ('these current guys are no good, bring in new guys') and it hasn't worked. How can the organization fix the problem if they don't understand what the problem even is? We've seen this all before, and it makes me cynical and I hate being cynical about my favorite team.

Give him the C, it'll make it easier to trade him two years from now.

If this is the case then they might as well trade Mittlestadt, Jokiharju, and Dahlin now, because the Sabres won't be winning any time soon trading all-star caliber players for prospects, no matter how good those players might be. To be fair to the new prospects, you'll need to give them a couple of seasons to mature into legit top 6 players. That's at least two more losing seasons for the new core. I wonder how frustrated those guys will be, losing season after season.

And everything he has done has been an abject failure. Hanging onto Krueger, gutting the scouting department, signing Hall to a ridiculous deal, not addressing the goaltending situation, terrible FA signings. He even payed Taylor Hall to play for the Bruins in the playoffs. He's got one year of experience as a GM, and that experience is of managing the Sabres to the bottom of the league. Sure the Pegulas trust him, but they trusted Botterill and Murray, and they fired both those guys after only 3 years in. Adams has two years to right this ship, and he's about to trade the only consistently productive fowards this team has had the last five years for prospects who haven't even managed to be point-a-game players in the AHL. You think Pegula is going to be patient watching the Sabres bottom-out the next two seasons waiting for Adams' kids make it to the big leagues? Eichel and Reinhart didn't save Murray. Dahlin, Mittelstadt, and Cozens didn't save Botteril. Adams better figure out a way to win soon, because I doubt Terry has found religion when it comes to patience with his GM.

Because he's an inexperienced GM who doesn't understand that "culture" is something that is developed, not created, and is under the delusion that NHL GMs are given the time and space to build a team from the ground up? In other words, he's no different than the last two failed GMs who held the job before him?

That's too much finesse and risk for the Sabres who are shopping their top 2 centers. The safer bet is to role with Eichel, Reinhart, and Mittelstadt down the middle. Add a goalie, prune the defense, find a useful winger or two, let the young guys develop, and see where the team is at 30 or so games in. That plan has better odds of working than any of the trade scenarios.

Gotcha time-loop.😄 The Islanders already have a talented team. Adding Tavaras to that group would help them get by the Lightning, who win by stockpiling talent. I know that's a bit foreign and shocking to us Sabres fans, who've grown accustomed to watching the clowns in charge the last decade try to use the addition by subtraction method to build a winner. We'll win by getting rid of Miller. We'll win by getting rid of Vanek. We'll win by getting rid of Kane. We'll win by getting rid of O'Reilly. Never worked. Win totals didn't improve, and neither did the locker room. Now it's we'll win if we get rid of Eichel. We'll win if we get rid of Reinhart. We'll win if we get rid of Ristolainen. In a couple of seasons, Dahlin, Cozens, and Mittlestadt will be the culprits. It's always the same, looking for the perfect player in a imperfect world. Maybe someday the Sabres will hire a GM who is just as interested in building a team as he is in tearing it apart. The Buffalo Sabres motto has been the future is 3 years away every season for the last 10 years.

A trade involving the worst team in recent NHL history isn't going to distract from the Stanley Cup. If anything it will drive more attention to the NHL's web site, TV channel, and and radio network. Unless, of course, if the trade involves one of the two SC finalists, that would be distracting 🤔.

The Islanders make the Finals (last and/or this season) with Tavares on their roster.

If the Sabres are delaying a move that they believe will improve their team because they don't want to take attention from teams playing for the Cup, well then there is truly no hope for them. They have become a doormat franchise. Could you imagine, "we had an agreement that we believed was a good one in place, but while we were waiting for the Finals to finish, our trading partner got cold feet and nixed the deal. But good thing we didn't distract from the finals. Go Lightning!" That would be even worse than paying Taylor Hall to play in the playoffs for one of your most hated rivals.

Blockbuster day? Sure if you consider the apocalyptic end of the franchise to be a blockbuster. 😄