Jump to content

seer775

Members
  • Posts

    228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by seer775

  1. 2 hours ago, SDS said:

    So this is no longer a team game. Got it.

    Correct.

    2 hours ago, PASabreFan said:

    Would the Leafs want someone with zero playoff games as a replacement?

    If they have the right attitude, yes.

  2. Drop Skinner.

    Sign Chandler Stephenson.

    Sign Tanev.

    Sign Monahan.

    Sign Clutterbuck and Joshua.

    Sign Samsonov.

    Promote Dahlin to Captain.

    Resign: UPL (market rate), 2-way (Krebs, Bryson, Joker, Jost, Robinson).

    Walk: Girgs, Olofsson, Comrie.

    Trade: Mule.

  3. On 5/4/2024 at 11:43 AM, ska-T Chitown said:

    Didn't all the teams make the playoffs for like ... the first 50 years? Not that it makes our sitch any better.

    The Sabres have the league record for longest losing streak, the longest playoff drought, and they are getting close to the longest playoff series win drought (they're at 18, Panthers were 24). The Sabres are only three years behind of the Leafs for longest cup drought.

    The Sabres are, without a doubt, the Worst franchise in NHL history.

    ... and they aren't getting better.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  4. 16 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

    That is a term I've heard out here now and again. Mostly if you mention Toronto or Ontario you get eye rolls or some sort of sarcasm like "oh, it's Ontario, well then it must be good" with full on sarcastic tone and disdain. 

    One thing I've heard multiple times from people who were born out here is they go visit Ontario in the summer and they are just not ready for the humidity. They come back hating the place for the experience they have with that weather. Just not ready for it. After 25 plus years out here I have issues with humidity now too. It's rare here. 

    This is my favourite Toronto video

     

    Our mayor might have been on crack, but in BC they love crack so much they made it legal! 

    • Haha (+1) 1
  5. 7 hours ago, PerreaultForever said:

    You're right about the media but it's not just hockey. There's a general media focus on Toronto for everything in Canada. Doesn't help that the CBC is located there. 

    and the rest of the country subsequently has some degree of dislike (or even hatred of Toronto) because of that.

     

    As a Canadian, there ain't ***** going on anywhere other than Toronto.

    ---

    Leafs will win game 7 and get steamrolled by the Panthers. Canes will beat the Rags and lose to the Cats. Vegas will clutch the Stars and demolish the Oilers. Then the Cats will get their first cup in ever.

    Now we have to deal with Florida 2.

  6. 11 hours ago, triumph_communes said:

    Cozens is a solid 2C everyone had suppressed numbers this year 

     

    They will look to UFA for a 3C. Ruff wants his veteran Gaustad. We have the cap to overpay for whoever this ends up being 

    Chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler chandler

  7. 5 hours ago, dudacek said:

    Wondering how many people on here know 21 Buffalo Sabres teams finished with worse records than this year's team.

    Furthermore, would you rather lose so bad you get a lottery pick, or just suck enough to miss the playoffs by (one fukcing point)?

    ... and then do worse the next year somehow???

  8. 5 hours ago, dudacek said:

    Wondering how many people on here know 21 Buffalo Sabres teams finished with worse records than this year's team.

    This team has the longest playoff drought of all time.

    Out of a 100+ year old league, with over 30 teams, this one is THE WORST EVER.

    ... and it's STILL GETTING WORSE.

  9. 15 hours ago, Doohickie said:

    Not sure I trust them any less than Byram, tbh.

    The answer to 3C is Chandler Stephenson or Sean Monahan.

    Still need a Top 4D to pair with Power. OEL, Walker, Montour, and Tanev are my votes.

    Still have to figure out what to do with Krebs. If he doesnt put up at least 30 points this year, he's out.

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. 23 hours ago, Doohickie said:

    And we've seen just how long it's taken Tage, Mitts and Cozy to develop.  Krebs is still a work in progress at best.  And @seer775 thinks someone's gonna jump out of Rochester and be our 3C?  Fat chance.

    Byram hasn't filled an obvious hole, and now we have a Mitts-shaped hole in the forward ranks.

    As others have said, this trade only makes sense if Adams as a plan to fill that hole.

     

    Top 4D is more important than Bottom 6F.

    You wanna give Joker, RJ, Mule, or Clifton top minutes? Would get us the best draft picks, if that's what you want.

  11. 23 hours ago, Mango said:

    No we do not. 

    We have some kids who might be good top 6 forwards in 3-6 years. 

    At some point the Sabres need to field a capable roster today. Not a roster full of kids who might be more capable tomorrow. 

    Edit: I will add that I think Sabres only had above average top 6 play from Tage, Mitts, and JJP this season. The rest were middling middle 6 at best this past season. 

    I think we need help at the top of the roster too. 

    No *****.

  12. 10 minutes ago, sabresparaavida said:

    This is true, however he has not returned to that level of play since. He has been decisively worse the last 2 years than during his rookie season. Generally you like to see improvements from young players, not them getting worse.

    Yes. He has had several concussions back-to-back and missed a ton of playing time because of it.

    Every deal has a catch.

  13. 4 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

    Who the F cares about this? "We need to bump those numbers," no we need to make playoffs. No one gives a ratsass if we get a 3rd instead of a 4th for Krebs if we decided to trade him. To hell with playing a guy above his head to get a better trade. Play to win or forfeit the season already. 

    Sorry to burst your bubble my guy, as an avid realist, we are most likely not going to make the playoffs next year. Not without 2 blockbuster moves.

    KA doesn't have the balls.

  14. 2 hours ago, Pimlach said:

    Byram is not >> Mitts. 

    Bryam is not a step in a half above Power.  He is not even equal to power. 
     

    Krebs was given a good look this past year.  I saw nothing indicating he should be given the 3C job.  He simply is not ready. He isn’t even a good 4C.    Is this a year we win or not? 

    We need to bring in a Lindy type defensively responsible of two way center that wins face offs and can provide secondary scoring.  Krebs is not that at this time. 

    At 20 years old, Byram played top minutes on the Stanley Cup Champs. He wasn't along for the ride.

    The point of playing Krebs at 3C is to figure out what kind of return we can get for him.

    Right now it's looking like a 4th. We need to bump those numbers.

    • Vomit 1
    • dislike 1
  15. 9 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    On the Sabres he would be the 1B C.  Cozens at his current level would be 3C behind Tage and Mitts.

    There was no reason to move him at all.  Just pay him.  But Kevyn didn't want to admit that he made a mistake anointing Tage and Cozens to the top two centers.  In fact if Casey commands $7 million or more it proves my point.

     

    9 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    Kevyn didn't want to admit that he made a mistake anointing Tage and Cozens to the top two centers.  In fact if Casey commands $7 million or more it proves my point.

    How? 

    We have a surplus at Top 6 F and a lack of Top 4 D. Top 4 D is more important than Top 6 F. Trade for Dmen makes sense here.

    I'm not one to defend the Sabres organization, but this is one of the times the team did something logical.

    • Eyeroll 1
  16. 1 minute ago, Doohickie said:

    On the Sabres he would be the 1B C.  Cozens at his current level would be 3C behind Tage and Mitts.

    There is no 1B C. There's a 1C, 2C, 3C, and 4C.

    Cozens has proven to be better than Mitts and is 2 years younger. We already have him and TT under term.

    That leaves 3C and 4C. At the price Mitts will bargain for (6-8 Mil AAV), he doesn't get a spot. Plain and simple.

    • Eyeroll 1
  17. 6 minutes ago, dudacek said:

    The bold can be true without saying there was no spot on the roster for Mitts.

    He could find a spot on the roster. I'm not saying he's bad. He's a good player.

    Given the choice between a Top 4 dman and a depth scoring forward, I would choose the Dman. 

  18. 9 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    I think you're underestimating Johnson there.

    Have I seen Byram play top notch defense?  Yes.  Does he do it consistently?  No.  (And that, by the way, is why the Avs moved him.)  Does he make too many bone-headed plays?  Yes.

    That's not why they moved him. Avs needed a 2C. They have solid dmen (Makar, Girard, Toews). Without scoring, they would drop to the Jets in 4.

    7 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    Mitts has improved every season.  So Cozens is better than Mitts was in the past.  I'm talking about Mitts NOW.  He's flat out better than Cozens.  We kept him through his lean years and traded him in his gravy years.

    Mitts now needs a $7M contract. He's not getting that to play 3C. 

    We need Top 4 Dmen. We have scoring forwards that are better than Mitts.

    Top 4 Dmen play the most minutes on almost every team.

  19. 4 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    Oh yeah?  Go on the Avs forum.  They were glad to be rid of him and his inconsistency.

    Not sure about that chief.

    Top 4 Dman, 7th in TOI/G during their 21-22 cup run. He was 20 y/o.

    1 minute ago, Doohickie said:

    And that was the first mistake.  He's at least 2C material; he's played 1C with no dropoff on the top line.  If anything, paying Cozens to be 2C was the mistake; he's still a "potential" 2C.  Mitts is the real deal.

    False. Cozens has a higher ppg than Mitts at 23 y/o. Despite last year's performance, Mitts has been a no-show.

    • Disagree 1
×
×
  • Create New...