Jump to content

seer775

Members
  • Posts

    228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by seer775

  1. 4 minutes ago, dudacek said:

    I don't see anyone else on the roster capable of filling in the minutes of either of those guys should they go down. And that's assuming Tage and Dylan can bounce back.

    I also don't see anyone on the roster capable of contributing anything close to what Mitts could from the 3C slot.

    This is kinda like the argument against acquiring Byrum. It's actually a good thing to have guys who are better than their roster slot.

    It's kinda what makes the good teams good.

    We were never going to pay Mitts top dollar to play 3C. Especially considering how awful our Defensemen are. Mitts could wing, but with Skinner, Tuch, JJP, and Quinn, why bother?

    Byram > Power >>> RJ, Clifton, Joker, Mule, Bryson.

    Having competent defensemen is more important than having skilled forwards. Dmen play more minutes in all situations.

    You build the roster from the net out.

  2. 39 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

    The trade was made and now the Sabres have a Mitts sized hole in the forward ranks and maybe....? an improvement on defense.  Makes no sense.

    TT: 0.68 ppg, 26 y/o

    Cozens: 0.59 ppg, 23 y/o

    Mitts: 0.55 ppg, 25 y/o

    Where is there room for Mitts?

    • Haha (+1) 1
  3. 1 hour ago, mjd1001 said:

    One more year for Krebs sure, but not if you are relying on him to be the 3C without a legit back up plan.  You can sign him, have him show up to camp and EARN a spot on the team, but he can't be penciled in to the lineup in any way.

    Bryam...not enough of a sample size on this team for me to say for sure how good I think he is. But I don't think he was better than Power since the trade happened.  Power I thought was vastly over-rated on this board last year, and he struggled the first half of this season. However, I think Power played very VERY well the last month or two. I'm not so sure I'd say Byram is better, or even matched Power's play toward the end of the year.

    It's partly to boost his trade value. He won't be serving anyone by sitting in Rochester. He would need to be traded to contribute if he proves he isn't NHL caliber this year.

    Byram was a crucial piece in the Avs cup run. That alone makes him a high caliber player. 

    • Eyeroll 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Thorny said:

    So are you looking to give Krebs first crack at 3C this year? He’s your guy for game 1?

    Byram wasn’t even CLOSE to as good as Power was, I don’t think we’ll be able to see eye to eye on evaluation here

    “Move the extras for a top 4 D”

    yes, our scraps that we don’t want will fetch a player as good or better than our 1C did…doesn’t seem very realistic tbh 

    Krebs at present belongs in Rochester. This season determines if he ends up there or not. He needs some time at 3C so we can make that call.

    We need a vet 3C who can step into 2C if Cozens regresses. Stephenson or Monahan are our guys.

    In any case, we have a logjam at Defense. We could use a Top 4 RHD and 2/3C. We have a ton of picks/prospects to leverage as well.

  5. 1 minute ago, Thorny said:

    Maybe a 40-50 game trial for Krebs next year on the menu? He should get a development year in the role

    (On a side, more straightforward note: if we dealt our leading centre for a D-man and still need a top 4 D man the trade was a failure)

    One more year before we ship Krebs.

    Byram trade wasn't a failure because we got a Top 4 Dman. Byram is much better than Joker, RJ, Clifton, and Samuelsson. I think he's a solid step and a half over Power also.

    Now we have to move the extras for another Top 4 Dman.

    Mitts isn’t the top 6 centre we thought we needed. He can and will (Adams..) be replaced.

  6. 1 hour ago, CallawaySabres said:

    First off, I don't think there is a prayer they are making the playoffs next year

    Full stop.

    We're trying to set records here.

  7. Just now, inkman said:

    I saw a couple hits by Clifton that seemed a little extra IYKWIM, but I never got the license plate of who he hit. 

    Is he done beating his wife?

    Charges dropped.

    Back in business.

  8. 19 hours ago, JoeSchmoe said:

    Jacob Bryson is playing really good hockey. In my books he's in our top 6. Last I heard, our record with him in the lineup is well into the plus side. Advanced stats have him up there. Here's are my D pairings for next year, emphasizing competition to stay in the lineup.

    Byram-Dahlin

    Samuelson-Power

    Bryson-Joki

    Johnson-Clifton

    The 5 to 8 D should be a competition all year. If you're good, you play, if not you don't. But right now, Bryson plays.

    Edit: inserted 5 on 5 relative ExGf%

    Screenshot_20240309-220052.thumb.png.76aa028225f7659a5e40c8ca4efd3f9a.png

    Why do we have 8 D?

    One of Joker/Bryson/Clifton has to go.

    Imo It should be:

    RJ - Clifton

    Bryson

    Joker sold.

    We should've traded him before the deadline. Now I don't know what KA is going to do.

  9. So we're looking like:

    Skin - TT - Tuch

    Quinn - Cozens - JJP

    Greenway - Krebs - Rosen

    Robinson - Girgs - Rousek

    Byram - Dahlin

    Power- Mule

    RJ - Clifton

    UPL - Comrie

    ---

    Basically if TT, Tuch, Cozens, and Skinner don't play like they did last year whilst keeping the goals against down, we're finishing 25th again.

    Cmon KA... do better.

     

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...