Jump to content

RonHextallsShoulderPads

Members
  • Posts

    250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RonHextallsShoulderPads

  1. Well, we've already addressed that we're sitting on two bad shootout goalies.  :lol:

    It's about tone. There's a stigma in the NHL that players shouldn't be getting cute with college sh*t in games. I could see Bylsma being one of those guys who tells the boys to stop playing around during shootout drills. 

     

    i feel like too many guys watched oshie and thought that yeah the slow, deliberate approach is the secret. no it's not. you're not TJ. slap the puck from five feet away like Vanek. you'll have better luck. 

  2. Breakaways aren't as easy as you think, regardless of talent, against an equally talented goalie who is focused solely on you. Even the best players are only hitting maybe 50%. 

     

    http://www.hockey-reference.com/leagues/NHL_2016_skaters-shootout.html

     

     

    and yet, for our five SO losses: the panthers first two shooters scored, the canes first two shooters scored, the first two red wings shooters scored, the first two sens shooters scored, and the second two flyers scored.

  3. attended the Caps game behind the Sabres shoot-twice. this is a very bad team. They're so lost, it's almost like they're forcing each player to play a position they're not meant for. they are throwing shots at the net from any angle, they have NO URGENCY, and they are not playing with confidence. This could've easily been a 5-1 game. And the worst part is that the Caps didn't even look that great, they just waited for the Sabres to make mistakes. And boy did they deliver.  

    This starts and ends with the coaching. 

  4. again, im just going off of extended highlights, which is a weird alternate world to begin with BUT what i'm seeing (and this could be off) is the Sabres throwing low-percentage shots at net from all angles and basically hoping they go in. Even the goal was scored in a fluky way, as was the Blues goal (that thing was fanned on and just slipped over the goalies shoulder. They need to hold the puck for a second longer, look for an opening and make a pass or force someone out of position. Slapping the puck into the goalies chest counts as a SOG, but that's about it.

     

    again, i could totally be off here, but i've seen it again and again. 

  5. Based on what we've seen so far, I think the Sabres need to re-sign Kulikov. 

     

    He hasn't put up points but he adds value on offense and plays a complete, physical game.  He can handle big minutes.  He's better than Tallinder or Lydman was and he's only 26.  He'll be a solid top-3 defenseman for the next 7 years.

     

    Based on my comprehensive research we need to re-sign Kulikov.

     

  6. I agree that it's early.  But history shows that when bubble teams fail early on to bank points that are very bankable, it generally comes back to bite them.

     

    Here's a positive note:  I went to bed before the 3rd period, but in the 2nd period, Zemgus looked better to me than he has in over a year, and the Zemgus-Moulson-Ennis line created a number of good chances.  In an ideal world, that line will start burying those chances and emerge as a respectable 2nd scoring line until Jackie boy and Evander return.

     

    I will feel much better if they beat Philly, which is always good for the soul.

    yes, but you're saying bank points that are very bankable. VAN is undefeated (regardless if they had a backup in net). how can anyone possibly know how any other team is going to perform this year based on 4-5 games? who even knows what's 'bankable' at this point?

     

    Aside from Calgary, the other three teams we've played are above .500(5-0-0; 3-0-1; 2-1-1), and everyone's decided to dismiss them as 'non playoff teams'.  

  7. And now we get to the reason that many of us disagreed with the tank:  it usually doesn't work.  Teams can't stink for an extended period, then get a couple of high draft picks, swing a couple of trades, and flip the switch into contender status.

     

    The Sabres are 1-3, with losses to 3 likely non-playoff teams (the Habs w/o Price are decidedly non-playoff).  If we soberly assess their odds of making the playoffs right now, we have to admit that they are -- what?  25%?  15%?

     

    The most likely outcome appears to be 10th-13th place in the EC and out of the playoffs again.  And then what?  Hope for a FA addition this summer that is a major difference-maker?  We're running out of cap space.  Hope Risto, Lehner, Eichel and Reino become real NHL stars?  Hope!  Change!  Tank!  High picks!

     

    Many drank the intoxicating tank Kool-Aid.  We're now entering the hangover period.  Let's hope it doesn't last 5 years.  But it really freaking might.

    dear god, am i reading a Bills thread? it's four games with three of them on a west-coast swing. maybe get a bigger sample size. 

  8. Yesterday Mike Schopp asked Tim Murray if he thought about trading Kane in the off-season.

     

    Rather than respond by indicating that he believed in Kane, supports him, and he is just going through a tough time...or something a GM probably should say, he responded by basically saying "No, because right now his trade value is low and if you make a trade you do it to improve the team."

     

    Murray is honest and direct to a fault and would make a horrible poker player.

     

    If he could have dumped Kane's ass for fair value, he would be gone by now.

     

    He won't be a piece in the organization's future if/when we start getting really good.

     

    I think this kind of talk can light a fire under certain players, which is good. If it doesn't, do you even want them on the team in the first place?

×
×
  • Create New...