Trettioåtta

There must be lots of conditions on this picks(s). That is what slowed the Blues trade down was the conditional 3rd or 1st for nothing or 2nd/3rd

Yeah but we got players. That's all that matters

We took on $2.5 million salary for a worse player. This must be for more than a 2nd

Good trade. Nuevirth has another year on his deal and him and Enroth can split duties for next year. Big fan of this

Yes, trading early was a good call by DR/TM

Buyers market for the trade deadline Weakest draft in over a decade Great year to tank...

Good thing we got a player back in this deal...

Mccormick > Mitchell Moulson is worth more than 1st I wonder what this is

We came so close to getting Ovi for Miller :(

That was 4 days ago!! :P

If He also got Halak and Stewart to flip them. I was hoping for more of a statement move. Let's hope he had all the trades lined up :/

GMTM. You are currently in the red failure zone.

Darcy never failed at the trade deadline :P

http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/jonathan_parker/ A scrub

What's the Etem/Moulson connection? LA/NYI trade?

I wanted us to trade for Turris. The guy clearly hated the Yotes and although he would never become a star, I thought he could become serviceable. I don't think GMTM is a bad GM (or assistant GM) but I want him to make the right moves, which to me, are the safe moves at the deadline

I wanted Fucale over Compher :P Clearly I have a thing against these guys... Oh well, it seems like the guy has potential. Just seems like a lot to pay for him. Let's hope it was the low seconds and he isn't a huge bust/having a one-hit wonder season

Shall we just close this forum now then? Obviously it is clear the GM wanted him, he paid a ######-ton for the guy. That doesn't mean it makes sense. Raycroft for Rask was once a trade. Just because GMs want a player or don't want another doesn't mean we (I) should just sit there and nod and say thank you. I do like us filling our HUGE prospect gap in wing by trading a defenceman

Bishop for Conacher was also a hockey trade made by GMTM.

I don't mind 'losing' a trade, but trading a lot for a guy who isn't a 'star' prospect and no-one valued 10 months ago just seems dubious. I also want Moulson, Ehrhoff, Stewart and Halak traded so this seems like an unusual step. There is a lot that HAS to be done, but we did this

It was 10 months ago!!! I get it that picks can be good in later rounds, but in the modern NHL how many truely good players have been hit on past the third round? Also how much can he improve in 10 months. We are talking about going from a lower 2nd liner on his team to the team star in 10 months

Goalies and European players before 2003 (rise of the true internet and youtube) don't count. The only late round pick who has truely hit is Jamie Benn No I don't - hence the asking people to explain it. I am saying on paper this just seems like a lot for a guy who was available for free last year and was deemed career minor leaguer just 10 months ago could now be traded for a stanely cup winnng first and a second

It just seems like a waste. We are meant to have the best scouting department but didn't spot him. GMTM is meant to be a good talent evaluator but didn't spot him. How much can really change in 10 months? He is a forward - the easiest position to draft. Not comparable to goalies

Haha. My bad. You're the one whining :P

If we have given up our second this will just be awful. He was a fourth rounder LAST year. In one year LA could have turned a 4th into the 31st and a second