Jump to content

...

Members
  • Posts

    15,353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ...

  1. This is it, mostly, and my only reservation is whether or not our situation is unique enough to be classified as unique. There are as many types of business owners as there are types of hockey player. Some have great instincts for the business they are in, some know instinctually to get out of the way of the people they hire. Some think they know what they are doing, really don't, but somehow manage to survive despite the chaos they create as owners. The variations go on and on. In Pegula's case I think we're dealing with these factors: Pegula is a fan who owns the team Pegula, because of his success in the O&G industry, thinks he can be a success in other industries Pegula has given control of the team to his wife, who was a Media and Entertainment dilettante (and is now a M&E incompetent) The Pegulas can not recognize that they need to get our of their own way with the Sabres
  2. This line of thinking needs to stop, it doesn't make sense. It's like believing your order from Amazon will be at your front door mere moments after you place it (cue the idiots with the "well, with drones and disty centers in every major metro, it could happen...! Err, dheerrr"). Let's be realistic: trades and deals take time and don't just happen, usually. This is fine and absolutely not an excuse for Botterill, just a reality fans need to accept. You don't just roll up to the NHL Trade Drive-Thru and get yourself a trade. Well, you can, but you wind up with Frolik. I don't think Botterill wrote this season off, I think Botterill made three mistakes this season: He thought this team would compete for a playoff spot. The moves he has made and not made since the summer strongly indicate this, which are tied to point number two. He is seriously challenged at talent evaluation. He thought his D acquisitions would turn into instant trade capital. Now he is stuck and the rest of the GMs in the league know it. The lack of activity presently is not a reflection of some long-term vision, it's the result of being incompetent at his job.
  3. I can't believe this hasn't been posted here yet: Someone posited that he may have known the camera was on him and this was an act.
  4. I think all of this is correct.
  5. Hutton over commits to those sides too much.
  6. Thanks. Restarted my Fubo app, we'll see if that helps.
  7. Yeah not the helpful.
  8. Anyone's feed having some glitches?
  9. Well, think of it this way, they're only down 2.
  10. Looks like we're not going to be buyers.
  11. They pushed the envelope on their Hutton-luck.
  12. Did they take a bus to Ottawa?
  13. Well, if that's true, the broadcast mentioned the shorty stats early on, then TO.
  14. Oh dear.
  15. Oops.
  16. I don't know, I'm alright with the penalty there. Just don't let in a shorty.
  17. Clearly time to trade Montour.
  18. He has a career as a DJ already set to go!
  19. What hostility. Very unwelcoming. I'm reporting this post.
  20. Sounds like he may be doing just that.
  21. Having worked in the news business myself, I would say that working in TV news generally (as in broadly speaking) makes one less qualified to identify discrepancies, and even less inclined to act on those discrepancies if identified, depending on the nature of the discrepancies and the players involved in the narrative.
  22. Animated GIFs, however, convey ideas quite effectively and efficiently.
  23. Bravo on getting in your political commentary, as anti-intellectual as you think it is not. As the for the "spirit" of your post... Hey man, you tried. Some people like the comfy, cozy feel of a government that is in total control. Imagine that.
×
×
  • Create New...