deluca67 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 I'm not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwrak Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 That's a tough question, the only thing that it boiled down to for me is reliability, Shanahan doesn't get hurt nearly as much as Forsberg, other than that my vote would have been for Forsberg, but Shanahan has my vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmwolf21 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Forsberg still has the ability to take over and dominate a game, though not as much as in his prime. Overall Shanahan has been more durable and more of goal scorer, but all things being equal, I'd take Forsberg nine times out of ten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 i voted for forsberg... they both have the hardware, however shanahan was more healthy in his prime... Although, for one playoffs i'd take forsberg in his prime... You know, as i type this, it doesn't really matter... they were both awesome in their prime. it's a tossup... (if i had to choose from a guy from that era, i'd take sakic) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.