msw2112
-
Posts
614 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by msw2112
-
-
1 minute ago, GASabresIUFAN said:
Here are the Sabres top 9 for 2024/25 after this trade
Skinner TNT Tuch
JJP Cozens Quinn
Benson Krebs Greenway
Is that a play caliber forward group? I guess it could be if Krebs, JPP, Quinn, and Benson are all better next year and TNT Cozens rebound from their terrible 23/24 seasons.
Do Kulich, Rosen, or Rousek fight their way into this mix? I think that Östlund is too far off. Anyone else in the mix in Roch that I'm not considering?
-
6 minutes ago, Thorny said:
We can simply wait and judge based on the results, that part is easy enough
my question is a different one: does KA, in his heart of hearts, in your estimation, think he’s making the team better next season, through this move, and it’s corresponding?
I know you can’t know the answer but what do you think. Do you think KA is making the deal to facilitate an improved team next season? Or long term?
I think he's looking more long-term. There are lots of young, talented forwards in the pipeline. There isn't room on the roster for all of them and you can't pay them all. Thus, long-term, you add a top-flight defenseman and open up a spot for a talented young forward in the pipeline. I just don't think any forwards in the pipeline are ready to make a major contribution this season or next. I hope I'm wrong.
Also, I believe they are looking at the long-term salary cap implications of signing Mittlestadt to a new contract at his present value and how that might hamstring the team in the future (as I stated above, you can't pay them all).
Note that my comments here are just my assessment of what I believe KA is thinking. I'm not a fan of the trade.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Thorny said:
Bowy will fit right in with Cozy and Krebsy. Want to be here.
Must be nice to be a young professional athlete.....
-
1
-
-
For those who wanted Adams to make a high-profile move, you got your wish.
I'm not a big fan of trade, given that Byram's skillset seems to be similar to what the team already has. Dahlin and Power are both talented "puck moving" defensemen, and Ryan Johnson and Jokiharju also skate well with the puck. The team really needs a physical presence on the blue line. Clifton plays physical, but is small and not highly skilled.
On the offensive side, Mittlestadt has been one of the team's few forwards who was strong along the boards and gave maximum effort all the time, while also displaying a high level of skill. Do any of the many young forwards in the pipeline play that style? I know there's skill, but is there the grit and determination along the boards, which this team sorely needs? I can only think that Mittlestadt's representation were in discussions with Adams about an extension and they were not seeing eye-to-eye. Rather than having a disgruntled player and bad PR, Adams made a move.
If Byram can stay healthy, the value is there. He's a high draft pick with NHL experience, has shown high-end ability, and is still young. I just don't see it as a fit for the Sabres' needs.
-
2 hours ago, JohnC said:
Who has said that he is a generational player? Maybe some fanatic fan who is a delusional partisan has made that ridiculous claim? The vast majority of normal fans have never categorized him as a player at a historical level. Let's just stop with making up stuff. Dahlin is arguably our best player who gets an overload of minutes. He is an all-star caliber of player. But trying to make an argument that he is a failure/disappointment because he hasn't attained the historical pinnacle of his profession is a manufactured and wasteful position to take.
At the time Dahlin was drafted, he was branded in the media as a generational talent. He was called the best defenseman prospect since Dennis Potvin. This isn't something that I or anyone on this board made up. That's what was being said at the time.
https://thehockeynews.com/news/thn-archive-sabres-top-d-man-dahlin-likened-to-swedish-star-forsberg
-
1
-
2
-
-
I admit that I don't watch enough hockey to make an accurate vote. I went with McDavid based on what I have seen over the last few years. He's the most skilled player and the fastest, and seems to play with jam.
An argument can be made for MacKinnon, based in his stats, his fairly recent Cup win, and the tremendous amount of jam he plays with.
Matthews is a one-trick pony. He's a hell of a goal scorer, no doubt, but he doesn't do much else and has not elevated his team in the playoffs.
I hope I don't regret saying this, as I don't want to turn this into a Jack Eichel thread, but remember when Eichel was supposed to be one of those guys? To his credit, he has fit in nicely with his new team and played a major role into winning a Cup himself, but he's not at the level of these other guys. And I still don't miss him in Buffalo.
-
3 hours ago, PASabreFan said:
No. It's a bad place to be. I am terrified that wins at this time of year only paradoxically extend our misery.
I assume you mean that wins now, or improved play, will extend our misery by leading to (a) a lesser value draft pick (picking at a higher number); (b) potential retention of current coaching staff; and (c) fewer roster changes for next season. These are all valid concerns. I'm less concerned about the draft pick, as they're likely to finish in the middle of the pack and have low lottery odds, regardless of what happens, and I'm not dying for huge roster changes. I think there is a lot of talent on the roster now. It would be interesting to see how this roster would perform with a different, more experienced coaching staff.
I like Granato. I think he's a smart guy, a good hockey guy, and the players love him. It just doesn't look like it's working. On one hand, their biggest issues last season were goaltending, overall defensive play, and penalty kill. They've improved a lot in those 3 areas. But now, their scoring is way down. Their record is still to be determined, but it certainly looks like the playoffs will be missed again and it's also not looking like they'll match or improve upon last season's record.
-
Last night was a good example of enjoying the team on an individual game basis. Although they were sloppy for a majority of the game, they got very good goaltending from UPL (again), scored some timely goals, including a breakaway shorty, a tip in by a player in front of the net, and a power play goal on a rebound when a forward was going to the net. These are the things we've been longing to see all season. Although sloppy, it was entertaining. The sloppy play was not lethargic play; rather it was more the fact they played fast and loose (like a pickup game) and that resulted in the puck being turned over a lot. That style won't work against more disciplined teams, but was successful against Montreal, who was equally sloppy and is below the Sabres in the standings for a reason. So, I'll take the win and see what happens next time.
It would be interesting to know if their style of play was intentional, given the opponent, or if that's just how things played out their own.
-
1
-
-
59 minutes ago, SwampD said:
It's a rare thing for me to watch them live. I usually start them late because I like have a cocktail when I get home from work and talk about the events of the day with my wife. Once we're sick of each other, I head down and follow along with the GDT like it's live. Sometimes I scroll too far and give up some spoilers. If the game looks like it is going south, I'll either fast forward through it our scroll ahead in the GDT to see if it's even worth it.
Looking forward to tonight's game.
I'm somewhat similar. I'm out of market and in the West, so the game is often already over by the time I start watching it. I need to get home from work, converse with the wife, have dinner with the family, get the kids to bed, do the nightly chores/prep for the next day, and once everything is out of the way, I get some alone time to sit down and watch the game.
As the season as become less meaningful, I often shortcut things by putting the game on while I do the chores, so it's on in the background but I'm not sitting down and focused. Usually, I'm done with the chores about 2/3 of the way through the 2nd period and I can sit down and watch the rest. Given that the game is already over, I can fast-forward through commercials and intermissions (sorry Duff and Marty), and cut the watching time down well below 2 hours. And if they are down 2 goals or more, I fast-forward until they are within 1. For better or worse, this has cut the watch time down in a lot of games to 15 or 20 minutes (they fall behind by multiple goals early in the game quite often....), but at least I'm getting to bed much earlier and I'm not wasting my time watching them get blown out.
-
1
-
-
I love the Sabres and have been a fan my whole life (which is about as long as the Sabres have existed). Like the rest of us, I'm beyond frustrated with the state of the franchise over the last 12-13 years and its present state. I live outside of the Buffalo market, but purchased ESPN+ this season so I could watch all the games. After last year's strong finish, I was on board to enjoy a great season of hockey.
I'm at the point where I've given up any hope of making the playoffs. The team is too far down the standings with too many teams in between. The ship has sailed.
That said, I do enjoy watching NHL hockey and I enjoy seeing the Sabres play well and win games. They win 40-50% of their games, so there's a decent chance they win on any given night. Many nights of late, they've played well and lost, but at least participated in an entertaining game. Outside of the last game, where he was awful, it's been fun to watch UPL's development. I have enjoyed seeing Greenway score some goals. Clifton has improved a lot since the beginning of the season. Ryan Johnson (also awful in the last game) has been a revelation. Mittlestadt has had a very good season. Even the lowly power play has shown some glimmers of hope in the last week or two. The PK has been leaps and bounds better than last season.
So I pose the question to the board: can you enjoy the Sabres on an individual game basis? We know the playoffs are out of the picture and looking at the standings is not a worthwhile endeavor. But, on any given night, they have a decent chance of playing an entertaining hockey game and/or pulling out a victory. Is that enough for now? Can you enjoy it or, given the totality of the season, are you just done?
I find myself conflicted, as I really enjoy hockey and it makes me very happy when the Sabres win, but I also realize that there's really not an end to the means this season.
How do others feel?
-
1
-
-
I'm not all that concerned about the decision to not salute the fans. It's just not that big of a deal. That said, I do agree that the team leaders (players and coaches) should have shut it down.
-
On 2/17/2024 at 5:08 AM, nucci said:
it was more of a joke. saying "back of the net" after a goal is annoying and overused. But I'm a grumpy old man so don't listen to me
My sarcasm meter was off when I read your post. I get it now! I do agree that a lot of these terms are overused and can be annoying. I found a couple of articles about these overused hockey phrases:
https://www.bardown.com/top-10-hockey-talk-cliches-1.1551046
https://bardown.com/top-10-hockey-talk-cliches-1.1551046
Good for a few laughs on a Monday morning.
-
1
-
-
I've never been to Prague, but have heard it's a great city to visit and I'd love to go. Chances are slim that I could make it happen. I have been to Munich (for what that's worth). I don't know that a Sabres game is enough to draw me back.
-
3 hours ago, nucci said:
that's the problem. You score from in front of the net
Did you see in the very next sentence where it says:
"They still need more traffic in front of the net"?
I assume you did and are in agreement.
-
9 minutes ago, Pimlach said:
Finishing checks - not every team does this. Just the good ones and the ones that play as a team to get beyond their individual talent/skill level.
EJ does it. Clifton does it. Zemgus sometimes does it. Dahlin sometimes does it. KO sometimes does it. Tuch sometimes does it. Cozens and Krebs do it on occasion.
That is not nearly enough.
You are correct. Along with EJ, Clifton also does it consistently. Note that these are both players who came up with other (successful) organizations and have not been with the Sabres very long. You are also correct that these other guys sometimes do it. The bottom line is that a team that desperately needs to get things going - the Sabres - should come out in the first period hitting everything that moves and trying to stir up some emotion. Particularly since falling behind early has been their achilles heel this season. And particularly at home, where getting the crowd into the game can really inspire a team. As stated above by a different poster, finishing checks gets the fans into the game, and a rowdy home crowd pumps up the players. It's a positive cycle.
-
1
-
-
I saw the game and am frustrated by the outcome. A few comments:
- While Comrie isn't a good NHL goalie, he was good enough to keep the Sabres in the game. The first goal was not his fault, the second one was bad, the third one was empty net and the last one was beyond garbage time - the game was over. The bottom line is that he had only given up 2 goals until very late in the game, which was good enough for the Sabres to be in the game.
- The Sabres skated hard and played pretty well for most of the game, but they just couldn't find the back of the next. They still need more traffic in front of the net. They make every goalie that doesn't play for the LA Kings look like a Vezina trophy winner. For most of the game, it wasn't a lack of effort, but it was misguided effort. They had one power play where they fired the puck at the next and had someone in front of the net (mostly Okposo) and although they didn't score, they had a bunch of chances. They need more of this every power play and also 5 on 5 when they have possession in the opponents' zone.
- I noticed that the Panthers finished EVERY check. I realize that it's not 1975 anymore, the game has changed, and not every opponent does this, but I also see that the Panthers are on a great run right now and are up near the top of the league, after winning the Eastern Conference last season. Maybe there's something to this? The Sabres, on the other hand RARELY finish a check. The only player that does this consistently is Erik Johnson, who is a long-time NHL veteran that did not come up through the Sabres system and has only been with the team a short time. Whenever I see him finish a check, I wonder why the younger guys don't see this and say - "this guy has been in the league a long time and has a Stanley Cup ring - maybe I should try that." And why the coaches don't tell the players to "watch that guy and do what he does." It doesn't score goals, but it establishes a competitive mentality that should rub off on other aspects of the game. It also might force an occasional turnover in the offensive zone that could lead to a goal.
-
7
-
In one of the games just before the All-Star break (LA or San Jose), Peterka scored a great goal when he drove the net. He may have even ended up in the net with the puck and maybe the goaltender too. I finally thought he (and maybe the Sabres) had figured it out. Having watched the team since then, not so much.
Unfortunately the video of that goal is no longer available (got a 404 error when trying to access the link). That may have been the only example that Granato had available to show in team video sessions and he can't get to it either.
-
9 minutes ago, Night Train said:
Feel bad for the injury but save me the excuses for his poor, gutless effort most nights. Luckily, he starts getting paid like a star next year. Nice reckless early signing , KA.
In fairness to KA, the guy was the consensus #1 pick overall and he played very well in his first full season. Burning the first year of his ELC has really come back to bite the Sabres in the butt here, as having another year to assess his worthiness of a large extension would have been useful. That said, burning that 1st year is what happens with players drafted at that level. It's not like the Sabres had much of a choice. I'm also in the camp that Power will be fine. He's having a bad sophomore slump season, but he has the tools and played well in his first season. Outside of Peterka and UPL, nobody on the Sabres is having a very good season.
Also, feline AIDS is the leading cause of death among domestic cats.
-
1
-
-
I played in some co-ed leagues and also some men's leagues where a few women who were former NCAA Division 1 hockey players participated. These women were among the best players on the rink. I couldn't check them, because I couldn't catch them....I think it's fine for them to participate if they have the skill and toughness to do it. They shouldn't be treated any differently than any other player. That said, despite chirping in hockey being a part of the game, there are certain things were you "don't go there" like race, religion, family, and offensive gender-related comments.
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, mjd1001 said:
Yeah I have. Its hockey, even a bad game I like to have it on the TV while I do other things around the house. If its a good game they are winning, I'm glued to the TV. So yeah.
Same here.
-
As to the discussion about the discussion of "injury prone," here's my take: a injury-prone player is a player who is a) genetically predisposed to injury more than the average player (the shape of their body parts or natural distribution of weight in their bodies puts more strain on certain areas as knees, ankles, achilles, shoulder, spine, etc.) or b) trains in such a way that makes them more predisposed to injury than the average player (maybe they don't stretch enough, they don't use proper form when lifting weights, or they bulk up too much on their upper body and not enough on their lower body, leaving the muscles around knees, ankles, or back weaker and thus providing less protection from contact).
I would not call Quinn injury-prone based on his most recent injury. He was taken down and slid into the boards in an awkward position, causing a bad impact that would have likely injured most players. It's a coincidence that this event occurred a few weeks after he returned from his achilles injury.
I don't know whether his achilles injury would be related to being injury-prone, as I don't know how it happened. Is his achilles tendon genetically weaker than that of other NHL players? (Then, yes, he may be injury prone.) Does the way he walks, runs, or skates put more pressure on his achilles tendon that is typical of other players? (Then yes). Or did he lose his footing while doing squats because he tripped over a 25 lb. plate that was in the way, he didn't see, and caused his leg to twist in such a way that his tendon tore and that would have torn most players' tendon? (Then no).
For those that are injury prone, a great strength and conditioning program, including a sports nutrition program can make a big difference. If the S&C coach and trainers can identify those areas where a player's body sustains more pressure or is weaker than other players', certain exercises can be done to strengthen the weak areas, or equipment like a brace can help protect a weaker area. I'm not a doctor or physical therapist, and I realize that ligaments and tendons cannot be strengthened, but the muscles around them can, and taping and/or braces can help protect an area of weakness. None of this can completely prevent an injury based on a really hard collision that would break bones or severely tear a tendon or ligament.
-
7 minutes ago, mjd1001 said:
I know the AHL has their own streaming package, but I really wish there was a way we could get the Amerks games on MSG or some other local station.
It may not be 'appointment' TV for me, but there are many nights where I just want something on the TV what I can 'kinda watch' while doing other stuff around the house, on the computer, etc. Amerks games would fit the bill for that.
I agree with you. Sadly, watching the Sabres has fit that bill for me this season too.
-
I really like Don Granato and want him to succeed. That said, I'm at the point where I think a new voice is needed behind the bench. Granato has not been able to fix the power play and he has not been able to get a consistent effort out of the team. Had the team played hard for even 50% of the game last night, they would have won easily. Instead, they played hard for about 3 minutes, in which they scored twice. It's not realistic to play balls-to-the-wall for 60 minutes every night, but the ridiculous lack of effort for 55 to 57 out of 60 minutes last night was pathetic. This seems to be the case all-to-often with this team.
Before blowing up the whole roster, I think you have to try a coaching change first. The team has plenty of talent, but that talent is not combined with the appropriate effort (and/or scheme). A proven veteran coach may be able to have success with this roster.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I'm sure this comment will not satisfy everyone, and it's not necessarily my own opinion, but here's what I think Adams' strategy is:
He wants to build a sustainable long-term contender and not just a team that can squeak into the playoffs once or twice. For some reason, a hockey example is not coming to me, but when I think of a baseball franchise, I think of the Houston Astros vs. the KC Royals.
The Royals have been terrible for decades, but had a brief renaissance in 2015 when the won the World Series (their first in 30 years). Since then, they've pretty much been terrible and haven't had a sniff of contention.
In contrast, the Houston Astros were also terrible for an extended period of time. They tanked and did a very slow rebuild. They were the worst team in the league for several seasons, before ascending. The result is that they've been a top contender ever since, reaching the World Series in 2017, 2019, 2021, and 2022, winning it in 2017 and 2022 and they were in the ALCS yet again last season (and I think I read they have been in it for an astounding 7 straight seasons).
I'm not saying that Adams' plan will work, I'm just saying that this is why I think he's staying the course with the excruciatingly slow rebuild.
We'll have to wait and see if 1) it works; and 2) if there will be any fans in the seats by the time they get there.
-
1
-
Casey Mittelstadt traded for Bowen Byram
in The Aud Club
Posted · Edited by msw2112
I do now. And obviously I didn't earlier, or I wouldn't have spelled it the way I did in my post - TWICE! Thanks to the Edit button, it has been fixed, but my error will live in infamy in your quoted post. I must have been subliminally thinking about former Buffalo Bills running back Carl Byrum: - https://www.nfl.com/players/carl-byrum/
I also spelled Jokiharju wrong and that has been fixed too.
I guess I need to be more focused on the details rather than trying to follow and comment on all the crazy Bills and Sabres news all day while trying to work!