Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    40,045
  • Joined

Posts posted by Thorny

  1. He's going NCAA which means the Sabres can lose his rights very easily.

     

    He can't do a ###### pull-up which means he might never play in the NHL.

     

    I'm guessing, I don't speak for Saratoga, but I'm guessing these are the ways he got to that place.

    I don't think it says anything about his hockey ability necessarily. But I'll give you that it's pretty ridonkulous that a 17 year old kid athlete can't do a pull-up.

     

    But again, don't think it affects his hockey future one way or another

  2. You haven't said why at all.  You have said move Sam to 2nd center, which means ROR moves to wing (I assume).  I am asking why you would move the better center to wing.

    Short term pain for long term gain. The idea that Sam Reinhart, a guy drafted #2 overall and led the WJC in points, on a team with the likes of McDavid, has the ability to develop into a better offensive centre than ROR.

  3. Per Washington Post

    Caps re-sign T.J. Oshie for eight years. AAV of $5.75 million.

    Holy hell.

     

    On the plus side for the Caps, "Skin Irritation" is written into the 5th year of his deal.

  4. would you hold onto Kane to try make play-offs this year? trade at deadline if they are out of contention. If they are in the race, come the deadline, let him potentially walk for nothing? 

     

    I think I would, unless someone knocks my socks off with a deal.

    Agreed.

     

    If his value right now is a 2nd and B-prospect, that's probably his value at the trade deadline, right? Though a player's value is usually highest right now, I'm not sure that holds for Kane. We could try to make a run and still get value if we fall short, or even if we're on the bubble (for instance, maybe Nylander is ready in spring) without sacrificing the run. Though I'm fairly certain trading Kane if we're on the bubble would cause a board crash :lol:

    This is where I am at as well. I'm not outright opposed to dealing Kane, I just probably put more value in a season-long rental than most, particularly if his current return is ballz.

  5. A. Can't make someone sign, he has to WANT to forgo his best shot to get a big payday.

    B. You need to trust him over a 7 year term.  Do you?

    If this were a Cup run year I'd agree with you.  It's not.  Kane has to be moved. Preferably today.

    Don't agree here. Can foresee a deep playoff run in the next 2 seasons (see, Ottawa) if they continue to fix the D.

  6. Mhm, and I think the overwhelming majority of cases show young 21 year old high draft pick high hockey sense players taking steps forward in their career at this point, not falling back, and if I were to think otherwise then that would cause a slippery slope and make me quite paranoid about Jack, who's already close to his physical ceiling and doesn't quite have the hockey sense of Sam. OEL - Hammer is a sick Swedish top pair. Goligoski is still there. Chychrun can take a step forward. They're all left handed, but Hammer plays the right side better.

      

     

    Curious, if Sam does break out, do you lean towards trading him or keeping him?

     

    I just hope I don't have to go through an offseason of overreaction to moves or lack thereof.

      

    Boy, have I got some bad news for you :p

  7. Can't we live in the now a little bit?  Do we always have to be planning three years ahead?  I want to see this team make the playoffs and win a series.

      

    Or just keep him?  Why are people so eager to see him traded?

      

    Not to speak for Eleven, but I am pretty sure his point is, irrespective of ability to sign Kane, why trade now and potentially sacrifice actually winning games for a change.

    I tend to agree with it. If we all think he's not garnering a team need or a blue chip pick, the value we waste isnt all that high really, is it? So lets just start winning and let the chips fall where they may.

     

     

    I'm on this team with you fellows.

     

    Blue, your side is well-reasoned as well, don't get me wrong.

×
×
  • Create New...