Jump to content

GrassValleyGreg

Members
  • Posts

    392
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GrassValleyGreg

  1. Can we ignore posters?  Seriously, calm the **** down.  For the most part there were maybe 4-7 players that could definitely help the Sabres day one of next season, all if not most were gone by #8.  

     

    It's fun when you get a new GM to trust his judgement and reserve your own. Message boards have turned fanbases into the most vocal and impatient lot. Let the guy establish a track record please.

  2. I have nipples, Greg, could you milk me?

     

    Seriously, a kid should be able to do a pull-up.

     

    Done.  Next time you and your love come to town, please let me know.  You'll love this place.  The fancy cocktails suck, but the charcuterie and other meats make up for it.

     

    I couldn't do a pull up in high school. 

     

    I now way 220 pounds with 2% body fat.

  3. People judging an 18 year old on pull ups   :thumbdown:​ 

     

    I know your a bit upset but have you ever seen him play? I have. Twice. Let me help you. Think of Jack. Only make him left handed. There you go. Done. He controls pucks finds open guys. Above average shot and he can fly and hit, even without the pull up. Going to the Gophers he will get stronger and he isn't waiting 3 years to go pro. Not a chance. All good.

     

    Go watch him skate, shoot, stick handle

     

    :thumbsup:   :thumbsup:

     

    Stands out on ice with elite skill more than anyone else in this draft.

  4. lol at people thinking TP is some genius with some plan in place that we can't see. I challenge anyone to find a more unintelligent owner in sports; one so wholly unfit and void of any prudence or ability to evaluate talent. Takes more greed and amorality to make billions destroying the earth than business acumen and foresight (see Beverly Hillbillies or most other inbred oil tycoons). 

  5. Re Franson: It's always different watching a game live, but there was a shift in the first when he got absolutely abused. No goal or penalty resulted, but it was ugly. That may have biased me, and then the two penalties came (and the Jets scored on one (Stafford?)).

     

    But I didn't notice him beyond that (other than being good in the final 5), so that likely means he was good at those times.

     

    Otoh, saying Franson was among our best D yesterday is damning with faint praise. Not a good showing from the Sabres D yesterday in general, it seemed.

     

    Thought Franson had an awful game. A number of glaring mental errors; lackadaisical around the puck. It's a shame Kuli has not been able to get it going. He's a big weapon in the type of transition game we're trying to play.

  6. Since drafting Sam and signing ROR, the hope of many was to see ROR shift to wing and have our back-to-back top 5 picks become an elite one-two punch down the middle. ROR's dominance in the circle makes this difficult to do right now (not to mention Sam being far from an elite #2), but the change may benefit the team under the current roster.

     

    Proposed lineup:

     

    Okposo - Eichel - Foligno

    Kane - Reinhart - ROR

    Gionta - Girgensons - Bailey

    Mouls - Grant - Des/Carrier

     

    Keep the first line going. They've shown some growth in the last few games (particularly on neutral D, Jack's stick is a big time disruptor here).

     

    Put ROR on the wing with Sam where he could still take draws often. 

     

    Girgs been playing well of late, and a change to center is what seemed to have been the spark. He'd be a solid #3, although he wouldn't have much protection in the circle here (maybe shift Kane with Gionta?). 

     

    Injuries have been the one consistent theme of the season, and one of the few strengths of our depleted roster is depth at center. If ROR is willing to make the move to wing and he maintains his play, then I think the experiment may pay off.  

     

     

     

    *Not necessarily advocating this, just more of a thought experiment.

  7. I'd like to propose a healthy forward lineup based on a few factors:

     

    1) Sam's comfort level at center. Sammy has not had a great sophomore season but he does look more comfortable when playing the pivot. 

     

    2) Smart Gio complementing forceful Kane. On more than one occasion Kane forced a bullet pass to Gio in the neutral zone. For any other player, it would have been caught in feet or deflected into a turnover. Gio simply opened up his stick and one-touched it to the off wing. I think these two are perfect complements to one another and Kane has a respect for Gio's game which can go a long way for his commitment and battle.

     

    3) Giving Lars some top line minutes. There is little doubt that Lars is one of our best and most consistent players on the ice. His skill is often as evident as his ability to play a two-way game. Putting him with some high-end talent could see him take another step.

     

    Note: We are one forward short of serious playoff contender. (Vesey :( )

     

     

    Larsson - O'Reilly - Moulson

    Foligno - Eichel - Okposo

    Kane - Reinhart - Gionta

    Girgensons - Grant - Carrier

     

     

    Thoughts? What are the negatives?

     

    Sorry if this isn't where wishful lineups should go.

  8. Sam's shift on the third goal is the best I've seen from him this year, but his game continues to weigh down our top six. I might move Lars up and let Sammy develop a bit at center. He appeared to start taking well to it before. 

     

    Kanes best game of the year showcasing speed and even some stickhandling, although I still don't notice his stellar forecheck as much as I used too. Maybe someone got in his ear about staying healthy? We should still dump and chase with him a bit more, especially if he's playing on the third. 

     

    I think its obvious the shootouts have been in Lehnny's head for a while now. Any history of a cold backup going in at the end of OT? Would it mess too much with psyche? (he is playing very well). Is it a role Anders would embrace? 

     

    To the guy taking an unprompted shot at "Hillary fans", not really any place for that. 

     

    Heading home and going to the game Thursday. Pumped! My optimism will take a dent if we don't put it away in regulation. 

  9. If a guy is acquired to score 30 goals a year as a winger for Jack or Ryan, that is the definition of a sniper. The speed, forechecking etc.. are added bonuses, but they are not the reason he was acquired.

     

    Sniper has a pretty specific definition and is in no way as broad as 30-goal scorer.

  10. Just watched the game replay here on the west coast. Some observations:

     

    -On Ennis: so nice to have him back after having tempered expectations followed by a slow start. Almost forgot how heady of a player he can be. Him and Reino are starting to understand each other's game and the resulting possession is impressive. What a bonus Enzo will be when we are at full go. Ennis-Reino-Eich could be a force in the o zone.

     

    -On Mouls: Obvious by now but another pleasant surprise is Mouls returning to form. After completely writing him off, he has shown what made him an NHL player in the past: hand/eye, positioning, and a decent shot with ability to finish around the net.

     

    These two players returning to form is really the early season story in my opinion, followed by Risto’s continued development and Oks smart and physical play and it's fit in our offense. Lehnney’s play could soon be included in this early season story line. 

     

    -On Bailey and Baptiste: Very evident infusion of youth and speed. Bailey especially seems motivated by pro minutes. Didn’t watch his defensive work closely, but he could be a tough decision when Fasch and Des are back.

     

    -On where we stand: Obviously not good to lose our top playmaker and Kane, but the absence of these two (our most dynamic but also most anti-system players) might have been a boon to DD and the development of his system. The anti-DD crowd is clear in their critique, but I agree with what one poster said: his system is glaring in its deficiencies when not executed but effective when bought into by all. The system is especially effective on the road. If we can bag more points at home, we are in good shape.

     

    Huge eastern conference stretch ahead. Nice to be heading into it with some confidence. 

  11. In addition to being wrong, you realize this post is the functional definition of reactionary, right? Arguing against reactionism by being reactionary is, as the kids would say, a bold strategy.

     

    I'm happy the irony was not lost, although my reaction to a two game win streak was solely to highlight the short-sightedness of the reactions by the reactionaries that came before. In reality, the constant negativity including tank talk, firing of head coach, etc. after the first four games (after losing best player with 10 minutes left in final preseason practice, missing our top FA acquisition to start the season, losing our best forechecker (maybe in league) and second fastest skater) was a drag on GDT. Hope a little streak turns that around and we can can return to some actual substantive analysis and critique. 

     

    And wrong how? Because we don't have the wild card tie breaker after 8 games. Come on.

  12. It's funny. Rob Ray mentioned that the coaching staff said that the Sabres needed to adjust and get more puck support in the neutral zone so that the only plays aren't stretch pass tip-ins or getting snuffed on the rush. Sounds to me like the reactionary posters that wanted that to change were correct, after all, they're 2-0 since that has changed. 

    I've liked Foligno to start the season. This is so much better than invisible-Foligno.

     

    Haha kudos to the reactionary posters for raising this strategic insight that has turned the early season around. Nothing to be said about players who've never played with one another getting some time together. Or the fact that we outplayed teams in three of our losses.

     

    And there's different levels of reactionaries. You, Flagg, actually do offer some insight with your early season negativity. 

     

    --

     

    Every game that goes by, the better that Risto deal looks. He's looked wholly sound in his own end and is jumping the zone  and possessing much more this season, a la his under 18 performances. 

×
×
  • Create New...