Jump to content

Rasmus_

Members
  • Posts

    3,315
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rasmus_

  1. 8 hours ago, LGR4GM said:

    I've been saying and I'll continue to say, I think Adams is moving to an advisory role and Kekalainen is at basically a internship with Pegula for GM. Adams and Terry cooked up this tryout idea. 

    Adams rides out the season and Kekalainen takes over in May 2026.

    Yes please, someone who has taken risks when needed and a career as a GM.  

  2. 2 hours ago, dudacek said:

    I loved the old model, big crowd, families, watching the power brokers all in one room.

    Sure it could have been tweaked into a better broadcast, but the format was unique to hockey and something I looked forward to.

    A lesser carbon copy of the NFL draft sucks.

    This years NHL draft, was the worst thing ever.

  3. 9 minutes ago, dudacek said:

    From the article:

    It’s a weighted combination of their production (goals, assists, expected goals, blocks, penalty differential) and their play-driving (on-ice expected and actual goal stats), adjusted for difficulty (quality of competition and teammates). The cards also show each player’s market value based on total contributions.

    The cards showcase both offensive and defensive ratings. I just showed the defence.

     

    Thank you for that too dudacek!

     

  4. Just now, DarthEbriate said:

    The easy way to read it is that the Sabres are at least 113% better.

     

    However, for that left-hand column I'm wondering if it's solely based on the 2024-25 Sabres or how much an impact being on last year's defensively-inept Sabres team had on those numbers. For example, if Norris had played between JJP and Quinn for 30 games (like Cozens did), would Norris' number be 12%?

    Thanks for the explanation.

     

  5. 55 minutes ago, dudacek said:

    I have no idea how to quantify that the way I tried with the goals for potential.

    In terms of in/out with the skaters this is what the athletic model has to say about their defensive impact:

    • Peterka 2% -> Doan (not ranked)
    • Cozens 8% -> Norris 39%
    • Lafferty 19% -> Danforth 40%
    • Jokiharju 56% -> Kesselring 81%
    • Clifton 13% -> Timmins 59%

    Not even sure how the stat (I believe it is a percentile relative to the league) is calculated, so take that for what it is worth.

    Alright, I'm not even going to pretend I understood this.  How would this percolate to on ice improvement?

  6. 6 minutes ago, Porous Five Hole said:

     Better be the sweetest sweetener in world history.  Kadri will be 35 this season and is signed for three more years (and will have to waive his no trade clause—unlikely). I love the concept of Kadri, but not for three more years at 7MM to pay him until 38. 

    Im at the point that I'm looking at production and the ability for someone to help us make the playoffs.   I'm fine trading Byram for futures and then flipping said futures for on ice improvements.

  7. On 7/6/2025 at 1:00 AM, inkman said:

    Yeah I’d like to see a young D prospect and probably draft picks.  I think the Sabres are doing them a bit of a favor. 

    I see that point of view too.  Additionally, I see that adding a player like Kadri, puts a positive note to the boys in the room.  That they're looking to push this year.  As it follows up on the "changing the culture", moves of Peterka for Doan and Kesserling.  The additions of Danforth, Timmins.  It just doubles down on that.  I would only see this if they are getting Kadri ++ for Byram. 

  8. 20 hours ago, Sabres Fan in NS said:

    Kadri is the type of player the Sabres need.  Tough and can score.  He would look good with Tage.

    If there was a sweetener with Kadri due to age and such Id be all about this.  Kadri put up quality numbers with an underperforming team starting a retool.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...