JujuFish
-
Posts
4,116 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by JujuFish
-
-
6 minutes ago, Demoted said:
One of the best teams in the league "just have to survive" the offseason is so great. Full of gems like this you get to laugh at.
You might want to re-read what was written, because (1) Scotty said survive the season without serious injuries and (2) Scotty agrees with your sentiment about the Bills still being good. Don't let your rage (toward people who are critical of the Bills) blind you.
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, tom webster said:
Corner? Douglas is here from the start and is better then what White was before the injury
Douglas is not better than pre-injury Tre. Post-injury, sure.
Wait, I just realized we're probably talking about two different injuries.
-
If the NFL could decide who Buffalo picks, surely they would want AD Mitchell. That way, we can have this constant storyline of whether the Chiefs or Bills drafted the better Texas WR, especially after the trade.
-
13 hours ago, Gatorman0519 said:
Beane really risking it all here. If Worthy turns into a superstar and we still can't beat them, it may spell his end. He has to hope Worthy is a bust and his extra picks pan out. For me, out of sheer principle I would never trade with your arch rival you can't beat. Already reports of some AFC GM's pissed as hell at him for doing that.
I've seen this take a lot from Bills fans, and there is absolutely zero logic in it. If the Bills weren't going to draft Worthy, then the Chiefs were going to get him regardless. It doesn't matter at all whether Worthy is a star, a bust, or somewhere in between.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, SabresBillsFan said:
NHL playoff hockey
I'm not familiar with this concept
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, carpandean said:
So, basically turned a fourth into a third to give KC control of the board when they need WR, too?
It's the 4th round compensatory pick for Edmunds that should have been a 3rd round pick to begin with.
-
Late to the party, but to answer the title: anyone who has told the Saudis to shove it.
-
1
-
-
8-2 starts and leading the league in run differential? Didn't expect that start for Cleveland. I will enjoy it while it lasts.
-
1 hour ago, SDS said:
Where in northern Vermont?
Sheffield
-
Went with a couple of friends to their friend's house in northern VT. Turns out the guy is a Rochester native, which was fun.
The weather was great. Traffic coming back was horrible. I'm glad I made the trip.
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, DarthEbriate said:
And I want the Bills to stop being the Vikings of the AFC. Over the last 30 seasons, the Vikings have loved drafting perimeter players in the 1st instead of OL and front seven D
The Bills have drafted 3 WRs (Moulds, Evans, Watkins) in the first round in the last 40+ years. Beane alone has drafted 3 front seven players (Edmunds, Oliver, Rousseau) in the first round.
I am not following the comparison.
-
1 hour ago, Mr. Allen said:
Still thinking I was just listening to all that crazy media? lol.
Yeah, I was WAY off. 🙂The problem I had was you and Aud Smell(?) acted like you knew what was going on. Talking like you KNEW Diggs wasn’t an issue inside the organization and anyone who suggested otherwise was wrong and crazy for thinking it. You guys come on here and act like you know so much about the Bills. But you both were so completely wrong and dismissed everything I tried to tell you as me just “listening to the media”. When I’m fact, I never once said anything about the media. I don’t get much of any of my Bills info from the media. I have other ways that you probably only wish you had. But it’s all good. Nice to see you both backtracking on here. lol.
Peace
You could teach a masterclass in how to show off one's insecurity.
-
3 hours ago, mjd1001 said:
Buffalo takes a cap hit he goes on to Houston...gets THEM to restructure
Restructuring with Buffalo wouldn't have changed his cap hit after moving him to Houston. That hit is the amount of money Buffalo had already paid Diggs that hadn't yet been counted against their salary cap (signing bonuses which get spread throughout the length of the contract).
-
1
-
-
With only a 6th round pick involved in this year's draft, I do wonder why they didn't wait until after the draft to pull the trigger. Now it seems like an inevitability that they'll be going WR with their first pick. I wonder how that affects teams' drafting strategies.
-
Well damn.
Diggs, I'm going to miss your passion. I wish you had gone to the NFC so I could cheer you a little better. Good luck out there.
-
1
-
-
I hope Ohtani is clean. He is one of the greatest players baseball has ever seen, and I'm sure a hero to many Japanese kids (and others, of course).
-
Is the idea that it's safer because there is less room to reach full speed? Is that increase in safety enough to counter the decrease in safety caused by an increased number of returns?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, mjd1001 said:
Saw it yesterday. It was decent but it could have been better I thought with a few changes. I thought they crammed too many characters into the movie, so most of them (even though the audience knew them already) had very little character development. It was like, the 'bones' were there for a good story, but they never really developed it that much because every 5 minutes it was 'time' for another star to get some screentime. I was still entertained though.
I picked up a $2 ticket to see it Tuesday (Fandango has a $5 off code (FROZENGHOST)). For that price, I'll give it plenty of leeway.
-
13 hours ago, nfreeman said:
Just saw it with my wife. I enjoyed it but I think I liked the first one more. OTOH, my wife liked the 2nd one better.
I'm with your wife on this one, but I will readily admit that watching in IMAX versus watching at home (like I did for part 1) influences this.
-
Looking forward to this. Living near Boston, I have to drive a few hours to be in position, but there won't be another chance to see totality anywhere near here until 2079.
-
I'll add another complaint (though not relevant to a written medium like this forum).
It really rubs me the wrong way when I hear someone pronounce the plurals of bias and process with an -eez ending. Lots of words do get plurals like this: ellipsis, diagnosis, parenthesis, genesis, catharthis, metamorphosis, psychosis, synopsis, and many more. But these are all -sis words of Greek origin, which isn't the case for bias or process.
This is something I mainly hear from otherwise well-educated people, which makes it baffling to me. It's like some form of pattern recognition gone wrong.
-
2
-
-
I don't particularly enjoy 'whom' being misused. 'Who' is perfectly acceptable these days in all but the most formal of occasions.
-
5 hours ago, Doohickie said:
"You" used to be the same way; it was the second-person version of "we." The singular was "thou", the plural was "you."
Even more specifically, it was only the plural objective case (back when we used to decline more pronouns than I/me and we/us). The subjective form was 'ye' for plural, 'thee' for singular.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Doohickie said:
Both have the same meaning. It means you don't care.
Buffalo Bills 2024 Thread
in The Aud Club
Posted
Well, thank you for outing yourself as someone not worth interacting with.