From what I heard, Botterill had several problems with analytics: 1. For the statistics that are generally regarded as useful, he over-valued some and under-valued others. 2. He had his own extra analyses that he wanted done.  Some may have been useful whereas others were head-scratchers. 3.If he zeroed in on someone, he would over-emphasise the positive analytics for that player and under-emphasis the negative analytics. If any one of these is true (IMHO, #1 is immediately o
    • Thanks (+1)
    • Like (+1)
    3