Jump to content

ndirish1978

Members
  • Posts

    92
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ndirish1978

  1. 2 hours ago, jad1 said:

    As an team, the Sabres have no clue  how to defend the front of the net. And that doesn't mean knocking people down. They don't take away passing lanes, tie up sticks, block shots, lean on guys in front. 

    It's just open season on the goaltender.

    I'm not super well schooled in hockey, just been reading about it the past few months. But, I don't see how we can consistently show such poor advanced stats on D and then apparently do nothing at all to solve the problem. I may be wrong, but I'm not seeing much in the way of system change in regards to our defending at all. Kinda bummed about it tbh.

    • Agree 1
  2. On 6/24/2023 at 2:14 PM, LGR4GM said:

    Also @ndirish1978you're actually being hypocritical in your own response. I'm not saying your religion is wrong, I'm saying you don't get to tell me your religion is right. 

    You're welcome to believe whatever you want, but your argument essentially calls everyone who doesn't align with your thoughts a hypocrite for not believing the "right" truth, then you act like a victim when your hypocrisy is pointed out. The fact that you immediately tried to pin my problem with the way you state your point on religion shows you have a predisposition against certain arguments. I don't care what your religion is, I don't care who you sleep with, I don't care about your social background. I am tired of the virtue signaling hypocrisy of people who say "I believe everything should be heard" but what they really mean is "I believe everything I value should be heard."

    • Awesome! (+1) 2
  3. 23 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

    Your religion doesn't give you the right to force your view or perspective on anyone. That's what's happening here, a small minority of ppl are using their beliefs to shutdown another group. I don't tell religious ppl they can't wear crosses in public or prayer in public or anything else. Why do they get to tell gay ppl how and when they can act gay in public? 

    The other day, I saw 2 Muslim ladies in a public building setting out a rug and praying. I didn't care, I didn't attack them, I didn't attack their religion. Why? Because that is their right. But apparently it's a bridge to far for a hockey team to acknowledge lgbtq+ ppl exist. 🙄 

    If your religion bans being gay then you can not be gay. But leave those who are, alone. No one is grooming kids to be gay. This is all fox news culture war bs. 

     

    I'm sorry but you're really picking and choosing causes here to fit your viewpoint. The pride contingent uses their beliefs to criticize people who don't support their cause just as much as any other group, pretending otherwise is patently untrue. You compare a private act, wearing a cross in public/public prayer, with a public act of telling people how to live their lives. That is just as easily changed to wearing a rainbow jersey being allowed and not telling people that their religion is wrong. I don't really care one bit what your cause is, just don't virtue signal in one direction and then immediately turn around and act like a victim. 

    Russian players grow up in a country where being gay is illegal - they have families at home who will likely face backlash if they were the jerseys. They choose not to wear the pride jersey and people are up in arms calling them bigots. Their culture tells them something is wrong, they probably agree with that sentiment and in the event they don't their family could face backlash for their opinions. Players should be allowed to support or not support whichever causes they want. I'm just tired of all these double standard arguments acting like one side is virtuous and the other is all hypocrites. Get rid of all the causes and just play the sport.

    I don't think any person should have to wear a pregame jersey supporting a cause they don't support. The only reason these causes are actually in sports is because they ultimately make the teams money on jersey sales, if they didn't earn, these special causes wouldn't even be an afterthought.

    • Disagree 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 2
  4. 3 hours ago, Georgia Blizzard said:

    If they are smart, they'd be careful on who they let go and base it on the analytics of their subscription base.  I'd hypothesize that cities with significant numbers of fans that have relocated to other parts of the country would be most willing to subscribe and view articles from their home town.  i.e. are there more readers for Buffalo content on The Athletic than there are for Los Angeles ? 

    I'm now in the south due to my job, I subscribe to Athletic to get local content on Sabres and Bills.  I have other sources for a national perspective.  If they get rid of the local Buffalo journalists, I'd drop my subscription immediately.

     

     

    They have stats views per article, feedback on the quality of the article from the little buttons at the end of every article and can track the number of comments in the comment section and questions posted to "mailbags." I would presume that's why none of the Buffalo guys are gone, they have solid interaction metrics. I see some stories on there with <10 responses but they are always from other markets.

  5. On 6/12/2023 at 5:35 PM, notwoz said:

    Maybe if you subscribed you could have saved a few jobs. And read some decent stories.

    None of the people canned were from the Buffalo beat so this is unlikely. It's also a weird move to try to guilt someone post-event when their post already shows they don't care. Not sure what the purpose of this was.

  6. 2 hours ago, Porous Five Hole said:

    This is true. Individual Sabres (or Knicks) games for the 2023-24 season can be streamed through MSG for $9.99. Or, a monthly cost of $29.99. 

     

    I don't understand why they would make the cost so ridiculously high. That's almost half a YoutubeTV sub on it's own.

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...