Rip Titwide
-
Posts
176 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Rip Titwide
-
-
Okay how many shorties we give up tonight ? I say 0 but there will be breakdowns and chances going against, lalime will just stand tall tonight to keep them out.
Buffalo will look like they are trying and keep it close and lose in OT when they take penalty and give Montreal a 4 on 3. Score doesn't matter just another close loss.
Keep the futility going maybe then DR can be shown the door. Go Habs.
As much as it pains me to say it, Im dangerously close to this line. This could very well be my outlook until something changes. I already threw my hands in the air after the summer of inactivity, back-tracking, and excuses.
-
The inability to hold the puck at the point has been a killer of this PP for as long as I can remember.
Oh and a lack of finish never helps either
-
Gaustad isnt even the player he used to be. Just a one trick pony now
-
We've got a GM overly loyal to players, yet the perceived notion is that the Front office craps on its players. And he sits on his hands and does nothing in the off season while the team that eliminated them makes all the moves he acknowledged he needed to make. The coach has lost his players and his head is on the chopping block, yet he's part of an ugly 3 headed monster that seemingly cant be broken up because the 3rd head is in charge as the owner is perpetually MIA... It makes me want to do
-
Gotta laugh now. Kaleta, if you're going to address a problem with Lucic...I dont know maybe you just go in firing instead of getting his attention first. Just a thought.
-
2, 5 and 10. and Cody botched up what woulda been a PP. I'm glad he did it but I bet Lindy scolds him for it and tells him, "no more".
In other words he saved a Goal Against
-
Gaustad and Kaleta had a great opportunity to spark this ###### show. Was there a worry going 2 men down with the score 4-0??
-
"Only reserved"? Really?
Misusing "only." One of my big pet peeves. And people who write "should of" instead of "should have." And "for all intensive purposes."
SUPPOSEABLY.........There isnt even a way to properly spell this butchering of the English language.
GAME DISCUSSION THREAD
in 2010/2011 Season
Posted
No doubt it would be nice. But it would leave me with a very strange what now?? feeling.