Jump to content

gg1

Members
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gg1

  1. 1 hour ago, SDS said:

    So the owners are smart making the football decisions and not smart making the hockey decisions? Because if they’re making the hockey decisions, it only makes sense that they are also making the football decisions.

    You're missing the obvious that the same owners don't want to rob the cash from a successful football operation to fund a money losing unsuccessful hockey operation.  Other than finally stumbling onto McDermott & Beane, Pegulas' business decisions have been questionable at best.

    • Like (+1) 4
    • Thanks (+1) 1
  2. as just noted on a certain social media site, a certain local radio -- and sabres -- flagship station finds itself in a very tough spot with its relationship with the team. how wgr is citing "reports" of a deal being "close," and has done very little of it's own reporting overnight on this is a bad look and sound. to know and not report because of partnership rules certainly dents reputation.

     

    jw

     

    Are you saying that the Sabres do have their media proxies?

  3. The last time they got a top name in this sense may have been Gregg Williams when Donahoe was in town? And Rex actually has a resume.

     

    Not quite. Greggo was a total surprise over the other name targets - Marvin Lewis & John Fox

  4. You don't get it - hopefully your high school offers a course on critical thinking and debate.

    You saying something doesn't prove anything. Someone else saying something doesn't prove anything.

    you've got an opinion? good for you. Learn to express it persuasively.

     

    Cute, weren't you the one bemoaning the part where people start calling each other names?

     

    I'll pull out the high school text book chapter where people start making stuff up when they can't defend their position. We get it, you don't like the Moulson signing. You could have left it at that. But I guess your critical thinking acumen got the best of you and you tried to express it. Quite unpersuasively.

  5. i didn't opine - you did. Just stop. Go back -re- read it all until you understand. Or don't. Either way, I really don't care.

     

    And you refuted the source of my opinion, meaning you must have a better source than the unreliable Internets.

     

    But since we're revisiting, let's recap:

     

    Moulson's salary cap impact - Refuted

    Moulson's soft play - Refuted

    Moulson's small size - Refuted

    Moulson's locker room influence - I guess we'll have to compare sources.

     

    Got any other excuses for this apparently craptastic signing?

  6. Get a real avatar and learn to think for yourself.

     

    Sorry, the porn king of 70s is taken

     

    Again, what makes you more qualified to opine on Moulson's leadership?

     

    Is it the same set of knowledge that makes you think that he plays a soft game? Or that goals & points don't matter to a hockey team?

  7. we need to get to the floor this year, not 5 years from now. Pay him, or anyone, whatever you awant in the next 3 years. we may need that space in 5 years.

     

    You know who provided a lot of points? Miro Satan - and he was run out of town as soon as a real leadership group showed up. Points are irrelevant to what the sabres are doing right now, and he won't be producing many points at 36 when points will matter. How do you know he's a great veteran presence?

     

    Sorry that the Sabres don't share your enthusiasm for the race to the bottom.

  8. yup. Yes he will dart in for a scoring opportunity but he is not a possession player capable of forechecking and playing a power game, which is the kind of team TM is building.

     

    Sorry to be a pest, but if this is the team that GMTM is building, why did GMTM just sign a guy who doesn't do the things that GMTM want done?

×
×
  • Create New...