Forecheck Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Nothing wrong with the length of term. At 3 mil per, he is easily tradable if ever necessary. 2 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 23 minutes ago, Brawndo said: That’s too long for a fourth line player This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. 3 3 Quote
Carmel Corn Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 2 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. Huh? Like who? Good luck finding another UFA who hits, blocks shots, kills penalties, etc. that would be cheaper. Maybe you want Greenway back? 2 2 Quote
Big Guava Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 (edited) 9 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. I guess it's a good thing they get their really good players to sign long term extremely cap-friendly deals so they can "overpay" 500K-1 million for these players instead of paying them 3-5 million a year more? Edited June 29 by Big Guava Quote
NAF Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 39 minutes ago, Brawndo said: That’s too long for a fourth line player Bro what? Six years? I like him but committing to a fourth line player for six years seems insane. 1 1 1 Quote
RPop Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 16 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. Sabres 4th line was outstanding and Beck was a big part of that. With a healthy Carrick this is great news 👍 3 1 Quote
krakensabr56390 Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 (edited) 39 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. Totally disagree… In a world where michael Kessel ring gets 4.5 million for literally being cannon fodder on the bench and sucking a whole year… $3 million for your best checking player that’s less than 1/33 at the cap is totally fine… Happy to have him for six years Fox also knew to readjust folks to what players are going to cost with the cap rising so much Edited June 29 by krakensabr56390 8 1 2 Quote
GoPuckYourself Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 I love this signing, we have a swiss army knife for another 6 at a reasonable amount. 2 Quote
Dr. Who Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 56 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. I often agree with you, but I dissent here. It's odd, because you have stressed the need for grit and physicality which Beck brought in spades. Unless you think last year was an abberation, this seems like a good signing to me. 1 Quote
MoondoggiesLV Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Love this. Beck is a heart and soul type that will do anything to help the team win. I’d have been really disappointed if we had lost him. 6 years is surprising but the cap will go up. I viewed him as a core player as the checking line really made a nice impact this season and he was the catalyst imo 1 Quote
Big Guava Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 7 minutes ago, Dr. Who said: I often agree with you, but I dissent here. It's odd, because you have stressed the need for grit and physicality which Beck brought in spades. Unless you think last year was an abberation, this seems like a good signing to me. Especially with the cap going up significantly over that time. 1 Quote
... Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Assuming the term is correct, I agree it's a bit long for a fourth line guy. Malenstyn is a locker room guy, though. I was a bit surprised to recognize that during the, I think, post-season interview. But he is a machine in his role and perhaps the coaches think he has more to give. 1 Quote
pi2000 Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 cashing in on his career high 7 goals last season prepare the banner i kid. nice signing, didn't expect him back.. he fills a role and fits in well in Buffalo 3 Quote
gilbert11 Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 2 hours ago, Carmel Corn said: Glad the Beck will return…nobody else on our roster plays like him. I know some money will be needed for Zellweger too. Krebs is not a priority IMHO. Might as well then get rid of Östlund, too, so nothing is left from Eichel trade. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 2 hours ago, Carmel Corn said: Huh? Like who? Good luck finding another UFA who hits, blocks shots, kills penalties, etc. that would be cheaper. Maybe you want Greenway back? I think Florida's entire third line last year made less than that combined. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 2 hours ago, RPop said: Sabres 4th line was outstanding and Beck was a big part of that. With a healthy Carrick this is great news 👍 Carrick's salary is 1 M. Anything over 2 for a 4th liner is an overpay. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 1 hour ago, krakensabr56390 said: Totally disagree… In a world where michael Kessel ring gets 4.5 million for literally being cannon fodder on the bench and sucking a whole year… $3 million for your best checking player that’s less than 1/33 at the cap is totally fine… Happy to have him for six years Fox also knew to readjust folks to what players are going to cost with the cap rising so much You can't balance a cap long term doing this. Kesselring is not a 4th line player he's being paid at the current 3rd pairing right shot D man rate (roughly and considering he had some leverage with this situation). They aren't comparables. Mark Kastelic is a decent comparable. He makes 1.5 with inflation Beck could have 2 and that would be a fair deal. The term is also questionable. 1 hour ago, Dr. Who said: I often agree with you, but I dissent here. It's odd, because you have stressed the need for grit and physicality which Beck brought in spades. Unless you think last year was an abberation, this seems like a good signing to me. Not at that number. See above. 1 Quote
dudacek Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Love the player, hate the contract, even with the rising cap. Going to be some crazy deals Wednesday. 1 Quote
tom webster Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 5 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. He’s going to be making the equivalent of $2M or less by the third year of the deal. It’s the going rate. Quote
Kristian Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 5 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: This one still screams Sabres having to overpay to retain players. I liked Beck's game last year but he's just a 4th line player and I think I would have tried to find a cheaper option with less term. And yet, we had Greenway at $4 mill. Salaries are just nuts these days, we need to keep that in mind when looking at this, making me think it looks pretty good? Quote
Scottysabres Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Beck must really like WNY. That goal against NJ is all I needed to see, this kid wants to win cups. Quote
Taro T Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 (edited) You've got a guy who fits in perfectly as a 4th line W on your team in the system you like to play. Not sure how much sense it makes to lock up 4th liners until they're 34. But, if they expect his play to not tail off too far when he's in his 30's, am ok with the price tag because of how long the deal is and how much the cap is going up. Like @tom webster said, this is essentially going to be the equivalent of $2MM/yr by the 3rd or 4th year which is a smidge pricy for a 4th liner, but again he fits in perfectly as a 4th liner on this team. As long as they aren't giving him a NTC/NMC, they should be able to get out of it if it starts to look bad around year 4 or 5 (and unlike Greenway's deal, they'd at that point likely have to pay someone to take a bad contract because he's starting from a point of being a 4th liner, not a guy that could easily be a 3rd liner). Guessing Carrick can expect about $4MM/year now when his contract's up in a year. Interesting how the team building philosophy of find guys you like and work in your system and then lock them up long term hasn't particularly changed at all with the new management coming in. If anything, it's become even more ingrained. Don't even want to think about what this means for what Krebs' deal will look like. That'll only be buying 2 RFA years. Edited June 29 by Taro T 1 Quote
bg17 Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 4 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Carrick's salary is 1 M. Anything over 2 for a 4th liner is an overpay. Alert the Wild and Michael McCarron. 6 years/3.3 aav. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.