Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

We are already dismantling our 109-point division winner. How many pieces do you move until your not that team anymore?

You have got to be kidding me.  Exactly zero has happened "already" other than trading Kesselring, who was more or less irrelevant to last year's team, and it's been credibly reported today that the Sabres are far from giving up on Tuch.

 

13 minutes ago, Crusader1969 said:

When he will only accept a trade to 5 teams, this is a huge overpay 

probably could get it done with UPL, a mid level prospect and draft picks.  20th overall to start with 

Seems a bit more reasonable but is anyone trading for Kulich?   

Well, it was 6 teams, and the proposed offer is an inferior goalie, a guy who is expensive and always hurt and thus likely has negative trade value and a good prospect who is several years away from being an NHL player.

You aren't getting a top-3 NHL goalie for nothing.

Separately, Helly was freaking awesome in the Olympics.  And the Sabres lost to the Habs in the playoffs this year because of mediocre goaltending.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thanks (+1) 5
Posted
Just now, PromoTheRobot said:

Tuch? Gone. Byram? Leaving. UPL, McLeod, Norris, Helenius, Östlund, all being dangled. 

You know all of this for certain?  Jarmo tell you this at your last pickleball match?  😉 

Expect there's a very good likelihood Tuch is leaving in 10 or so days.  Not convinced Byram is on the way out.  The others, for the right price could see them go, but for some of them, the right price is pretty steep.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, thewookie1 said:

You want our 1st, sure I’m flexible but not that flexible. Helle’s season last year, and previous playoff appearances do concern me. Thus it would feel off to trade a guy who seems to have that “it” factor for a player who has yet to prove he has it in crunch time minus 1 gold medal. 

Like I said I’m taking the vezina goalie. Playoff narratives disappear quicker than they get written. I live here. I know what’s up. We want Helle. The failings are on the team and their increasingly Adams-like GM 

Edited by Nacho Libre
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

We are already dismantling our 109-point division winner. How many pieces do you move until your not that team anymore?

I mean he's dumped our #9 defenceman already and hasn't signed or acquired ANYONE yet.

Hellfire and damnation looms. Oh the enormity of it all.

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
2 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

You want our 1st, sure I’m flexible but not that flexible. Helle’s season last year, and previous playoff appearances do concern me. Thus it would feel off to trade a guy who seems to have that “it” factor for a player who has yet to prove he has it in crunch time minus 1 gold medal. 

So you're saying the Congressional medal of honour winner is just lacking the "it" factor of our two-time playoff goal scorer? 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
Just now, Trettioåtta said:

Goalies don't usually go for too much.

UPL + Quinn or Kulich + 1st for Helly + 3rd is my guess

Would, but I’d need Jarmo to really step up efforts to add at forward.

Edited by Hoss
Posted

In case anyone is unclear from my previous posts, I am in generally in favour of acquiring the player currently the consensus choice of "best goalie in the NHL". 😜

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Nacho Libre said:

Like I said I’m taking the vezina goalie. Playoff narratives disappear quicker than they get written. I live here. I know what’s up. We want Helle. The failings are on the team and there increasingly Adams-like GM 

I agree.  I want Helly, but I am not giving up Helenius.  I want both "Helly's".  I understand those that refer to Konsta as a lottery ticket, but I disagree.  He is 20 years old and looked amazing on a big stage already.  Late first round picks are lottery tickets.  If Konsta is one, then he is one with 5 of the first 6 numbers right.  

Here is the thing.  Helly shouldn't take Konsta.  He is a 33 year old goalie coming off a down season and wants to get out.  He won't be free, but he should not cost that much.  Of course, all it takes is 2 teams to have a bidding war.

Edited by Long Suffering Fan
Posted
Just now, Nacho Libre said:

Like I said I’m taking the vezina goalie. Playoff narratives disappear quicker than they get written. I live here. I know what’s up. We want Helle. The failings are on the team and their increasingly Adams-like GM 

Winnipeg were the President's Trophy winners last year with 116 points. They had 110 points the season before. Maybe you forgot.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Long Suffering Fan said:

I agree.  I want Helly, but I am not giving up Helenius.  I want both "Helly's".  I understand those that refer to Konsta as a lottery ticket, but I disagree.  He is 20 years old and looked amazing on a big stage already.  Late first round picks are lottery tickets.  If Konsta is one, then he is one with 5 of the first 6 numbers right.  

Here is the thing.  Helly shouldn't take Konsta.  He is a 33 year old goalie coming off a down season and wants to get out.  He won't be free, but he should not cost that much.  Of course, all it takes is 2 teams to have a bidding war.

My argument isn’t that it will cost Helenius. My argument is that I definitely trade the guy who MOST likely ends up a second liner for the best goalie in the world when we know we can contend right now - if that’s what it costs. I’d find the alternative laughable 

ymmv 

Edited by Nacho Libre
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, dudacek said:

I mean he's dumped our #9 defenceman already and hasn't signed or acquired ANYONE yet.

Hellfire and damnation looms. Oh the enormity of it all.

We'll see what this team looks like next year and if they make the playoffs.

Posted
13 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

You want our 1st, sure I’m flexible but not that flexible. Helle’s season last year, and previous playoff appearances do concern me. Thus it would feel off to trade a guy who seems to have that “it” factor for a player who has yet to prove he has it in crunch time minus 1 gold medal. 

Really?  

1.  What is a 20th overall pick really worth?  It's probably a 50/50 shot that the guy plays 100 NHL games.

2.  It's still the most important position in the game, and Helly still is the best at it right now.  Imagine a tandem of Helly and Ellis, trading off Lyon and UPL, and Levi having a make it or be traded year.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Nacho Libre said:

My argument isn’t that it will cost Helenius. My argument is that I definitely trade the guy who MOST likely ends up a second liner for the best goalie in the world when we know we can contend right now - if that’s what it costs. I’d find the alternative laughable 

ymmv 

Why do you act like you already know what Helenius' ceiling is?

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Winnipeg were the President's Trophy winners last year with 116 points. They had 110 points the season before. Maybe you forgot.

No, the jets finished 26th last year. The won the presidents trophy 2 years ago.

which team are they now?

is buffalo what we were 2 years ago? Guess what: 26th. 

No, a better reflection is what we were last year 

1 minute ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Why do you act like you already know what Helenius' ceiling is?

You are a parody account. The irony of typing this when you are LITERALLY CLAIMING JARMO has torpedoed the team when he hasn’t done anything yet

”why do you act like jarmo has already traded everyone away?” Like take a nap 

If you aren’t a parody account your content is atrocious I’m sorry 

Edited by Nacho Libre
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Nacho Libre said:

No, the jets finished 26th last year. The won the presidents trophy 2 years ago.

which team are they now?

is buffalo what we were 2 years ago? Guess what: 26th. 

No, a better reflection is what we were last year 

Kevin Cheveldayoff is still the GM. Their best players forced their way out.  We know what that's like, don't we.

And last year was 2025. This past season ended a week ago.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Posted
Just now, nfreeman said:

BTW, if it's true that the Sabres are one of SIX teams that Helly is OK with -- that is pretty nice.

Agreed. Thanks for making sure that is not being overlooked here.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

We'll see what this team looks like next year and if they make the playoffs.

Why yes, we will. 

I don't have a real sense of what that will look like with all the obvious question marks tied to cap and contracts — largely created by Kevyn Adams by the way — but I'm kind of jealous that you seem to.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Crusader1969 said:

That seems like an awful lot 

Östlund or Helenius would an awful lot,   Kulich or Quinn I would be ok with, rather send Kulich out even, though he might be underrated coming back from injury by most of us.

Posted
Just now, Huckleberry said:

Östlund or Helenius would an awful lot,   Kulich or Quinn I would be ok with, rather send Kulich out even, though he might be underrated coming back from injury by most of us.

I think the pertinent part for me is we have so many young forwards with upside that I am comfortable we can survive the loss of any given one.

I've got my favourites too, but I can't objectively say any of them will be better than what Jack Quinn is now. Not when none of them were better than Quinn was when they were Quinn's age.

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, dudacek said:

I think the pertinent part for me is we have so many young forwards with upside that I am comfortable we can survive the loss of any given one.

I've got my favourites too, but I can't objectively say any of them will be better than what Jack Quinn is now. Not when none of them were better than Quinn was when they were Quinn's age.

We had an entirely theoretical rebuild in perception around the quinterka exentions. How quickly we forget 

  • Agree 1
Posted

From another Board:

 

 

Ferraro mentioned on the Dregs podcast that Sabres were eyeing a C at 20:00. Said he doesn't like to mention names but the player is younger than Josh Norris (27). He reiterated think young. Made it seem like the player would be an upgrade & take some assets to acquire, but the Sabres have what it takes.

 

I listened to the clip.....and Ferraro sure seems to imply that the name is one that hasn't really been talked about at all. And he sure seems to imply that the Sabres could do BOTH get a young center AND get an upgrade in goal without depleting the farm.
 

  • Thanks (+1) 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...