Jump to content

GDT: Sabres @ Avalanche, 9:00pm Nov. 13, 2025, 🎙 📺 ESPN+/MSG


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Archie Lee said:

Interesting to me, to see Dave Hakstol (two-time NHL HC, with 3 playoff seasons) as an assistant behind the Colorado bench. Hakstol did not coach last year after being fired by the Kraken. The Avalanche, coming off a one hundred point season, decided to upgrade their coaching staff.   

It’s not any one thing and it certainly isn’t the players in general. It’s the cumulative effect of dozens of poor decisions and choices that put the Sabres where they are. Competence is the only path out. 

You have to start at the top.  Adams has to go and the next guy needs to have full autonomy to run NHL hockey operations

Last night they were just completely outmanned.  Colorado has an elite team featuring several of the best players in the NHL against a bottom feeder that was forced to play minor league players. 

Lyon gave up 2 goals on 3 shots  and so did UPL, but luckily UPL's 3rd goal against was disallowed or that game was over after 1 period. The difference in how the teams play was obvious.  

It was good to see the Sabres claw back and tie it up at 3-3, only see UPL give up a very soft goal put put the Avs ahead to stay.  Colorado really dominated play in the 3rd period, it was just a matter of time.   

The Sabres Power Play not only failed them but it was a momentum killer. 

Why is Appert behind the bench?   Why does Ruff want this job?  Why did he agree to coach with this staff?   

How bad will it get?  The owner needs to do something, a major rebuild is upon us.  

Tuch is looking like the smartest man in the room.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, KC Scouts said:

When does it stop?……  My wife told me to turn it off 52 seconds into the game. She said “This is your signal that the game isn’t going to go well, turn it off or you’ll get upset” Why don’t I listen to her?

 

Because like all wives she’s wrong most of the time.  Start pretending you can’t hear.  Might frustrate her enough to stop offering constructive criticism. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, DarthEbriate said:

1-4-4 in their last 10.

What will be the result of the next 10 games?

Hey! That's not 10.

2-4-4 in their last 10. One win in their last nine.

3 hours ago, Shoot da Puck said:

I was watching Gunsmoke,  Festus was running the town while Matt is out doinking some broad named Mike. Matt has no memory cause he got hit in the head but his memory comes back later.

 

Did Matt's memory return by being struck in the head a second time?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, Pimlach said:

How bad will it get?  The owner needs to do something, a major rebuild is upon us.  

Tuch is looking like the smartest man in the room.  

Jarmo teaching Adams to play hardball with solid, if unspectacular, players would be a start. Rather than Okposo 1x3 and Girgensons 3x2.2 (not terrible) and 1x2.5 (bad -- he wasn't improving), Greenway for 4, etc.. It's an Adams Tax, not a Palm Trees and Taxes Tax.

The real question to me now are the prized RFAs: Benson, Doan. (Kesselring TBD). The former 2 are guys you can include in a long-term core and benefit greatly from. Still need the 1C and 1G, but they're worth paying. But will they want to be here or will they JJP their way free and get traded for 2027 RFAs?

 

Now, watch Tuch re-sign for 8x$7M once his agent is able to kick the signing bonus cash portion of the contract up a little higher to be a bit more buyout proof.

Posted
9 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

Jarmo teaching Adams to play hardball with solid, if unspectacular, players would be a start. Rather than Okposo 1x3 and Girgensons 3x2.2 (not terrible) and 1x2.5 (bad -- he wasn't improving), Greenway for 4, etc.. It's an Adams Tax, not a Palm Trees and Taxes Tax.

The real question to me now are the prized RFAs: Benson, Doan. (Kesselring TBD). The former 2 are guys you can include in a long-term core and benefit greatly from. Still need the 1C and 1G, but they're worth paying. But will they want to be here or will they JJP their way free and get traded for 2027 RFAs?

 

Now, watch Tuch re-sign for 8x$7M once his agent is able to kick the signing bonus cash portion of the contract up a little higher to be a bit more buyout proof.

god no. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Pimlach said:

You have to start at the top.  Adams has to go and the next guy needs to have full autonomy to run NHL hockey operations

Last night they were just completely outmanned.  Colorado has an elite team featuring several of the best players in the NHL against a bottom feeder that was forced to play minor league players. 

 

Outmanned.  Anyone 30 years old or under should still be in their prime.  That takes you back to the 2013 draft (13 drafts).  From that draft on, that should be the prime of your roster to make sure you aren't 'outmanned'.

Since then, the Sabres have had:

-2 #1 overall picks.

-4 total top #2 overall picks (including the 2 above)

-11 top 10 overall picks

-18 overall first round picks.

On top of that, 18 additional 2nd round picks, many of them at the top of the round.

How can you be outmanned against ANYONE with that opportunity, with that many 'kicks at the can'. 

 

How about the 13 years before that, when they made the playoffs often and that was with a team with unstable ownership that hardly ever spent any money?  The 13 years before that when they were much, much more successful they had:

-0 #1 overall picks.

-0 total top #2 overall picks

-1 top 10 overall picks (Vanek at #5)

-15 overall first round picks (many of them in the bottom half of the first round)

-Only 12 2nd round picks, very few at the top of the 2nd round.

 

Edited by mjd1001
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
8 hours ago, pi2000 said:

they need Benson, Norris and Zucker back

they're not deep enough to sniff .500 hockey missing arguably 2/3 of their their first line and half of their top 6

...and their captain 

Norris? Who's that 😁

2 hours ago, Flashsabre said:

Pegula treats the Sabres as a tax write off.

Shades of that LA Clippers owner during their $hit years of the 1990s 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, DarthEbriate said:

Hey! That's not 10.

2-4-4 in their last 10. One win in their last nine.

Did Matt's memory return by being struck in the head a second time?

No, he remembered he was sheriff and was sorry for the doinking and left

Posted
8 hours ago, pi2000 said:

they need Benson, Norris and Zucker back

they're not deep enough to sniff .500 hockey missing arguably 2/3 of their their first line and half of their top 6

...and their captain 

Norris is a bust.

Posted
1 hour ago, mjd1001 said:

Outmanned.  Anyone 30 years old or under should still be in their prime.  That takes you back to the 2013 draft (13 drafts).  From that draft on, that should be the prime of your roster to make sure you aren't 'outmanned'.

Since then, the Sabres have had:

-2 #1 overall picks.

-4 total top #2 overall picks (including the 2 above)

-11 top 10 overall picks

-18 overall first round picks.

On top of that, 18 additional 2nd round picks, many of them at the top of the round.

How can you be outmanned against ANYONE with that opportunity, with that many 'kicks at the can'. 

 

How about the 13 years before that, when they made the playoffs often and that was with a team with unstable ownership that hardly ever spent any money?  The 13 years before that when they were much, much more successful they had:

-0 #1 overall picks.

-0 total top #2 overall picks

-1 top 10 overall picks (Vanek at #5)

-15 overall first round picks (many of them in the bottom half of the first round)

-Only 12 2nd round picks, very few at the top of the 2nd round.

 

Fire Adams, Pegula. You slug.

You disrespect your players and fans.

Posted

Stats last night tell the story.

Not winning Face offs, so not controlling the puck and missing opportunities to rush the O-zone or the net.

Not shooting the puck. Too many passes. Looking for pretty play. Can’t get rebounds if we don’t shoot.

Perimeter shooting instead of driving to the net. 

This is coaching failure. Game plan, PP, and in-game adjustments.

Ruff?? Appert??

 

Posted
9 hours ago, pi2000 said:

they need Benson, Norris and Zucker back

they're not deep enough to sniff .500 hockey missing arguably 2/3 of their their first line and half of their top 6

...and their captain 

But if they are a .500 team at full strength is that good enough? 
 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...