Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Eleven said:

Omigosh I would have guessed this if asked.  All of you Yes people are similar.

I wasn’t a huge Yes fan but I did see them at Rich Stadium early 70’s. I later saw Emerson, Lake and Palmer and Carl Palmer was amazing. Just some useless facts about myself that your post reminded me of. Carry on.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Eleven said:

Omigosh I would have guessed this if asked.  All of you Yes people are similar.

lol - i've evolved (changed?), i swear.

i almost never intentionally listen to the band's music anymore. i still love it, though. but i love it like a memory.

further proof that i've grown: when PROG GOD peter gabriel came to town several years ago, i skipped the show.

Posted
3 hours ago, Taro T said:

The reasonable position to take would be that the Iggles keep the ball and continue that 2nd possession of the OT.  However, technically, it is the 4th possession of OT and because the Bolts had the lead, the game should be over.

Would be quite surprised if the league thought that far through their new OT rules, and considering they've already ignored a clear rule in a playoff game and allowed the backup refs to overturn the actual refs in said playoff game; expect that the league would ask itself "what would Taylor Swift want done here" and then act accordingly.

Per the bold, that’s another damn good point as it is indeed another possession by the Eagles and the 4th possession in OT. I’d be surprised if the league has thought this thru as well. What would Taylor Swift decide? 

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
20 hours ago, shrader said:

It sounds like the colts were disappointed when they realized Johnny Unitas wasn’t available for a workout. 

Johnny at his peak thru a bomb 45 yards.   Like a dumpling.

Posted
4 hours ago, shrader said:

What happened here?

Bills Texasses.  Texass KR catches ball in the end zone and then drops it without 1st having taken a knee.  Bills recover in the end zone.  Refs called it a TD.  After conferring (at the backup refs request) they decide improperly to overrule the call; but they didn't even change it to a safety deciding the ball was dead in the endzone (same as if it had rolled out fo the endzone after he'd've controlled it and then lost it) they called it a fair catch, Texass ball on the 20.  And the rationale was, well he meant to declare himself down/ take a knee.  Problem is, they don't adjudicate plays on what a guy meant to do, they adjudicate plays on what a guy ACTUALLY did.  And that guy fumbled the ball and the Bills should've added either 6 or 2 points to their score then.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Scottysabres said:

Edmonton 4

Sabres 5

why?

I haven’t a clue, I guess even though my frustration with this team is showing stronger than normal these past couple of weeks I still have hope. 

I think the Oilers arent playing hard on purpose.They are fried from last year Why not just turn it on at the last 2 weeks?

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...